The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of different adhesive systems and post surface treatments on the push-out bond strengths of fiber-reinforced post

다양한 접착 시스템 및 포스트의 표면 처리가 섬유 강화 포스트의 접착 강도에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Min-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Ahn, Jin-Hee (Department of Prosthodontics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Lee-Kyoung (Department of Prosthodontics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Shim, Hye-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital)
  • 김민우 (한림대학교 성심병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 안진희 (한림대학교 성심병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 김이경 (한림대학교 성심병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 심혜원 (한림대학교 성심병원 치과보철과)
  • Received : 2016.02.22
  • Accepted : 2016.05.17
  • Published : 2016.07.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the push-out bond strength of glass-fiber post cemented with different adhesive systems and surface treatments. Materials and methods: 160 tooth samples made from 48 human maxillary single-rooted teeth with similar root length were divided into 4 groups according to the adhesive system (no adhesive, Adper Single Bond 2, Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil S3). Each group had 4 subgroups according to the post surface treatment methods (no treatment, sandblast, silane, sandblast and silane). Posts (Parapost Fiber White) were cemented with Rely X Unicem. The teeth were sectioned perpendicular to their long axis into 1-mm thick sections. The push-out tests was performed at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results were evaluated by 2-way ANOVA, 1-way ANOVA and multiple comparison procedures (Tukey test) (${\alpha}=0.05$). Results: Tukey test showed that the adhesive system significantly influenced the push-out strength. The Clearfil SE Bond group showed the highest value. Post surface treatments showed no significant effect. Conclusion: Bond strength of glass-fiber post cemented with self-adhesive resin cement using Clearfil SE Bond showed significantly higher values compared to other adhesive systems.

목적: 본 연구에서는 자가-접착 레진 시멘트의 접착 강도에 포스트의 표면 처리와 접착 시스템이 미치는 영향을 조사하고자 하였다. 재료 및 방법: 비슷한 치근 길이를 가진 48개의 사람 상악 단근치를 사용하여 160개의 시편을 제작하고 접착 시스템에 따라 4개의 군으로 분류하였다(no adhesive, Adper Single Bond 2, Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil S3). 각 군은 포스트 표면 처리 방식에 따라 다시 4개의 군으로 세분하였다(no treatment, sandblast, silane, sandblast and silane). 포스트를(Parapost Fiber White) Rely X Unicem을 사용하여 접착하였다. 치아를 장축에 수직으로 1 mm 두께로 절단 하였다. Push-out test를 0.5 mm/분의 crosshead speed로 시행하였다. 2-way ANOVA, 1-way ANOVA 검정을 시행하였고 Tukey test를 통한 사후 검정을 시행하였다(${\alpha}=0.05$). 결과: Tukey test를 통한 사후 검정에서 접착 시스템에 따른 차이가 나타났다. Clearfil SE Bond가 가장 높은 접착 강도를 나타내었다. 결론: 상아질에 Clearfil SE bond를 사용하고 포스트를 실란 처리시 가장 높은 접착 강도를 나타내었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lamichhane A, Xu C, Zhang FQ. Dental fiber-post resin base material: a review. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:60-5. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.60
  2. Pereira JR, Lins do Valle A, Ghizoni JS, Lorenzoni FC, Ramos MB, Dos Reis So MV. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:134-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60353-4
  3. Seefeld F, Wenz HJ, Ludwig K, Kern M. Resistance to fracture and structural characteristics of different fiber reinforced post systems. Dent Mater 2007;23:265-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.018
  4. Choudhary S, Begum Z, Choudhary P, Tripathi S. Comparative evaluation of retention of prefabricated and conventional cast post: An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2014;4:87-91. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.137635
  5. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. New concept of coronoradicular reconstruction: the Composipost (1). Chir Dent Fr 1990;60:131-41.
  6. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Sadek FT, Radovic I, Toledano M, Ferrari M. Surface treatments for improving bond strength to prefabricated fiber posts: a literature review. Oper Dent 2008;33:346-55. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-86
  7. Matinlinna JP, Ozcan M, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of a 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane and vinyltriisopropoxysilane blend and tris(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)isocyanurate on the shear bond strength of composite resin to titanium metal. Dent Mater 2004;20:804-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.009
  8. Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Pereira-Cenci T. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and metaanalysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent 2014;39:E31-44. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-070-LIT
  9. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:153-62.
  10. Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:218-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.01.006
  11. Demiryurek EO, Kulunk S, Sarac D, Yuksel G, Bulucu B. Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.047
  12. Kahnamouei MA, Mohammadi N, Navimipour EJ, Shakerifar M. Push-out bond strength of quartz fibre posts to root canal dentin using total-etch and self-adhesive resin cements. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:e337-44.
  13. Das AK, Muddugangadhar BC, Amarnath GS, Garg A, Kumar U, Rao TR. Comparative evaluation of push out bond strength of a fiber post system using four different resin cements: An invitro study. J Int Oral Health 2015;7:62-7.
  14. Helvacloglu Klvanc B, Deniz Arlsu H, Ucta ll MB, Okay TC. The effect of different adhesive system applications on push-out bond strengths of glass fiber posts. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:305-11. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.305
  15. Erdemir U, Mumcu E, Topcu FT, Yildiz E, Yamanel K, Akyol M. Micro push-out bond strengths of 2 fiber post types luted using different adhesive strategies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:534-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.05.049
  16. Erdemir U, Sar-Sancakli H, Yildiz E, Ozel S, Batur B. An in vitro comparison of different adhesive strategies on the micro push-out bond strength of a glass fiber post. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e626-34.
  17. Skupien JA, Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Pereira-Cenci T. A systematic review of factors associated with the retention of glass fiber posts. Braz Oral Res 2015;29. pii: S1806-83242015000100401.
  18. Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, Monticelli F, Raffaelli O, Cardoso PC, Tay F, Ferrari M. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:353-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00146.x
  19. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:963-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.002
  20. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:627-35.
  21. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH. The overwet phenomenon: a transmission electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acidconditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996;9:161-6.
  22. Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H. Bonding of photo and dual-cure adhesives to root canal dentin. Oper Dent 2003;28:543-51.
  23. Giannini M, Carvalho RM, Martins LR, Dias CT, Pashley DH. The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentin on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:315-24.
  24. Inoue S, Koshiro K, Yoshida Y, De Munck J, Nagakane K, Suzuki K, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2005;84:1160-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508401213
  25. Miguez PA, Pereira MP, Swift EJ Jr. One-year tensile bond strengths of two self-etching primers to bovine enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:243-8; discussion 249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00044.x
  26. Tsuchiya S, Nikaido T, Sonoda H, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Ultrastructure of the dentin-adhesive interface after acid-base challenge. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:183-90.
  27. Matsui N, Takagaki T, Sadr A, Ikeda M, Ichinose S, Nikaido T, Tagami J. The role of MDP in a bonding resin of a two-step selfetching adhesive system. Dent Mater J 2015;34:227-33. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-205
  28. Aksornmuang J, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts. J Dent 2004;32:443-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.03.001
  29. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006;22:752-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.002
  30. Roh H, Noh K, Woo YH, Pae A. Retentive bond strength of fiberreinforced composite posts cemented with different surface treatments. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2014;52:113-20. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2014.52.2.113
  31. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Toledano M, Goracci C, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Improving the quality of the quartz fiber postcore bond using sodium ethoxide etching and combined silane/adhesive coupling. J Endod 2006;32:447-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.061
  32. Li R, Zhou H, Wei W, Wang C, Sun YC, Gao P. Effects of Mechanical and Chemical Pretreatments of Zirconia or Fiber Posts on Resin Cement Bonding. PLoS One 2015;10:e0129690. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129690