International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of damage control training scenarios of naval ships based on simplified vulnerability analysis results

  • Park, Dong-Ki (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Korea University) ;
  • Shin, Yun-Ho (System Eng. Research Div., Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials) ;
  • Chung, Jung-Hoon (System Eng. Research Div., Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials) ;
  • Jung, Eui S. (School of Industrial Management Engineering, Korea University)
  • Received : 2016.02.15
  • Accepted : 2016.04.06
  • Published : 2016.07.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Given the growing interest in damage control training for the naval ships and their organizations, expectations for a new concept of training program have also increased. The existing training programs and its concept focus on training crew to be more proficient and skilled so that they can respond better to damage situations, i.e., fires and flooding. This paper suggests a development procedure of damage control training scenarios using the survivability analysis results as a new concept of damage control training programs employing advanced systems such as damage control console, automation system, and kill cards. This approach could help the decision maker not only enhance his or her capability but also improve the reacting capability of crew members for complex situations induced by a weapon hit.

Keywords

References

  1. Bradbeer, N., Andrews, D., 2009. Survivability Implications of Adopting Commercial Ship Design Style inWarships. UCL mechanical engineering forum.
  2. Chung, J.H., Lee, S.G., 2001. Current status on shock response analysis techniques of naval vessel via underwater explosion. J. Comput. Struct. Eng. Inst. Korea 14 (2), 11-17, 6.
  3. Cosby, L., Lamontagne, Y., L-3 Communications MAPPS Inc, 2006. Critical Assessment of Damage Control System Technology. Defence R&D Canada-Atlantic Contract Report.
  4. Donnelly, W., Seidle, N., Kuzma, H., Castanedo, S., O'Mara, J., 2003. Advanced damage control system for LPD 17 Class ship. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Ship Control Systems Symposium.
  5. Gates, P.J., 1987. Surface Warships. Brassey's Denfence Publishers.
  6. Kaminski, M., Buckley, J., Kuzma, H., 2009. Advanced damage control casualty Management: DC automation. In: Proceedings of Intelligent Ships Symposium VIII.
  7. Kim, K.S., 2011. A Study on the Procedure to Assess the Vulnerability of Warship. Master degree thesis. Inha university.
  8. Kong, Y.K., Lee, H.Y., Chung, J.H., Choi, W.S., 2011. Study on the vulnerability analysis method of naval vessel at concept design stage. In: Proceedings of Annual Autumn Meeting Society of Naval Architects of Korea, pp. 777-782.
  9. Kwon, J.I., Chung, J.H., Kim, B.H., 2009. Study on the simplified vulnerability analysis and its application at concept design stage. In: Joint Conference of the Korean Association of Ocean Science and Technology Societies.
  10. Love, D.S., Williams, M.R., 1991. Military Requirements for Petty Officer First Class. Naval Education and Training Professional Development and Technology Center.
  11. Miller, H., Mclntire, J., Southerland, J., 2001. Damage Controlman. Naval Education and Training Professional Development and Technology Center.
  12. Parent, J.M., 2012. Integrating Vulnerability Reduction in Ship Design. In: TNO Course: Survivability Design against above Water Threats.
  13. ROKN, 2007. Naval Ship Damage Control Guidance. Combat Development Group.
  14. Sajdak, J.A.W., 2007. MOTISS Beta 2.0 User Theory Manual. Alion Science & Technology.
  15. Shin, Y.H., Kwon, J.I., Chung, J.H., 2013. Development of a simplified vulnerability analysis program for naval vessel. J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Korea 50 (6).
  16. USN, 2013. Standard Repair Party Manual for Naval Surface Force. Department of Navy, Naval Surface Forces.