DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Novel Approach to Submandibular Gland Ptosis: Creation of a Platysma Muscle and Hyoid Bone Cradle

  • Received : 2015.11.12
  • Accepted : 2016.04.04
  • Published : 2016.07.20

Abstract

Submandibular gland ptosis is a common impediment to obtaining superior surgical aesthetic results in neck lift surgery. Techniques for suspending the submandibular gland have been proposed, but these procedures have the drawbacks of disturbing the floor of the mouth mucosa and periosteum. We present an approach of submandibular gland suspension for the treatment of gland ptosis by employing a platysma and hyoid bone fascia cradle. Our technique was performed on cadaveric models. The platysma muscle and hyoid bone cradle for submandibular gland ptosis was created on the left side of the neck in two cadavers. A submental incision with sharp dissection was performed to raise a supraplatysmal flap. A subplatysmal plane was developed until the submandibular gland was identified. Sutures were used to pexy the platysma to the hyoid bone periosteum and deep cervical fascia, tightening the overlying muscle and in turn elevating the submandibular gland. Submandibular gland ptosis must be corrected in order to achieve exemplary aesthetic results. Our approach of creating a cradle with the platysma and hyoid bone avoids the potential complications of previously described sling procedures, while still maintaining the integrity of the gland and surrounding tissues.

Keywords

References

  1. Ellenbogen R, Karlin JV. Visual criteria for success in restoring the youthful neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;66:826-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198012000-00003
  2. Sullivan PK, Freeman MB, Schmidt S. Contouring the aging neck with submandibular gland suspension. Aesthet Surg J 2006;26:465-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2006.06.007
  3. Guyuron B, Jackowe D, Iamphongsai S. Basket submandibular gland suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122:938-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181811e12
  4. Singer DP, Sullivan PK. Submandibular gland I: an anatomic evaluation and surgical approach to submandibular gland resection for facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112:1150-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000076507.50053.08
  5. Skandalakis JE, Gray SW, Rowe JS Jr. Surgical anatomy of the submandibular triangle. Am Surg 1979;45:590-6.
  6. Lee MK, Sepahdari A, Cohen M. Radiologic measurement of submandibular gland ptosis. Facial Plast Surg 2013;29: 316-20. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1349356
  7. de Pina DP, Quinta WC. Aesthetic resection of the submandibular salivary gland. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;88:779-87. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199111000-00005
  8. Labbe D, Giot JP. Open neck contouring. Clin Plast Surg 2014;41:57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2013.09.014
  9. Batra AP, Mahajan A, Gupta K. Marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve: an anatomical study. Indian J Plast Surg 2010;43:60-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.63968
  10. Giampapa V, Bitzos I, Ramirez O, et al. Suture suspension platysmaplasty for neck rejuvenation revisited: technical fine points for improving outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;29:341-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0027-y