Archives of Plastic Surgery

  • 제43권4호
  • /
  • Pages.365-370
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2234-6163(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6171(eISSN)
대한성형외과학회 (Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Validation of the Expectations of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Scale

  • Naraghi, Mohsen (Division of Rhinology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Atari, Mohammad (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran)
  • Received : 2016.01.07
  • Accepted : 2016.06.21
  • Published : 2016.07.20
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

Abstract

Background There is a growing concern in the field of aesthetic surgery about the need to measure patients' expectations preoperatively. The present study was designed to develop and validate the Expectations of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Scale (EARS), and to compare expectations between rhinoplasty patients with and without body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). Methods In total, 162 college students and 20 rhinoplasty candidates were recruited. The measures included the newly developed EARS, a measure of psychopathology, and demographics. The DSM-IV structured clinical interview for BDD was used to confirm the diagnosis in rhinoplasty patients. Results The EARS was constructed of six items based on their significant content validity. In the scale development phase, Cronbach's alpha was 0.87. The test-retest reliability coefficient of the scale was satisfactory (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.98) over a four-week period. Scores on the EARS were significantly positively correlated with psychopathological symptoms (r=0.16; P<0.05). Moreover, comparison of EARS scores between BDD (M=25.90, standard deviation [SD]=6.91) and non-BDD rhinoplastic patients (M=15.70, SD=5.27) suggested that BDD patients held significantly higher expectations (P<0.01). Conclusions The expectations of aesthetic rhinoplasty patients toward surgery may play a crucial role in their postoperative satisfaction. While the value of patients' expectations is clinically recognized, no empirical study has measured these expectations in a psychometrically sound manner. The current study developed and validated the EARS. It may be easily used as a valid and reliable instrument in clinical and research settings.

Keywords

References

  1. Sarwer DB, Crerand CE. Body image and cosmetic medical treatments. Body Image 2004;1:99-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00003-2
  2. Faria FS, Guthrie E, Bradbury E, et al. Psychosocial outcome and patient satisfaction following breast reduction surgery. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:448-52. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1999.3167
  3. Sarwer DB, Wadden TA, Pertschuk MJ, et al. The psychology of cosmetic surgery: a review and reconceptualization. Clin Psychol Rev 1998;18:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00047-0
  4. Mohammadshahi M, Pourreza A, Orojlo PH, et al. Rhinoplasty as a medicalized phenomenon: a 25-center survey on quality of life before and after cosmetic rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014;38:615-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0323-5
  5. Clarke A, Lester KJ, Withey SJ, et al. A funding model for a psychological service to plastic and reconstructive surgery in UK practice. Br J Plast Surg 2005;58:708-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.02.005
  6. Rumsey N, Harcourt D. Body image and disfigurement: issues and interventions. Body Image 2004;1:83-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00005-6
  7. Naraghi M, Atari M. Comparison of patterns of psychopathology in aesthetic rhinoplasty patients versus functional rhinoplasty patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;152: 244-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814560139
  8. Naraghi M, Atari M. Self-esteem and rhinoplasty: a case-control study. Plastic and Aesthetic Research 2016;3:111-4. https://doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2015.103
  9. Dey JK, Ishii M, Phillis M, et al. Body dysmorphic disorder in a facial plastic and reconstructive surgery clinic: measurIteing prevalence, assessing comorbidities, and validating a feasible screening instrument. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015;17:137-43. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2014.1492
  10. American Psychiatric Association; American Psychiatric Association; Task Force on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
  11. Carroll DH, Scahill L, Phillips KA. Current concepts in body dysmorphic disorder. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2002;16:72-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/apnu.2002.32109
  12. Crerand CE, Phillips KA, Menard W, et al. Nonpsychiatric medical treatment of body dysmorphic disorder. Psychosomatics 2005;46:549-55. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.46.6.549
  13. Veale D, Boocock A, Gournay K, et al. Body dysmorphic disorder: a survey of fifty cases. Br J Psychiatry 1996;169:196-201. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.169.2.196
  14. Veale D, Anson M, Miles S, et al. Efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy versus anxiety management for body dysmorphic disorder: a randomised controlled trial. Psychother Psychosom 2014;83:341-53. https://doi.org/10.1159/000360740
  15. Goin JM, Goin MK. Changing the body: psychological effects of plastic surgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1981.
  16. Cotterill JA. Body dysmorphic disorder. Dermatol Clin 1996; 14:457-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8635(05)70373-9
  17. Harris D. The benefits and hazards of cosmetic surgery. Br J Hosp Med 1989;41:540-5.
  18. Castle DJ, Honigman RJ, Phillips KA. Does cosmetic surgery improve psychosocial wellbeing? Med J Aust 2002;176:601-4.
  19. Rosen JC. Body dysmorphic disorder; assessment and treatment. In: Thompson JK, editor. Body image, eating disorders, and obesity: an integrative guide for assessment and treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1996. p.149-70.
  20. Crerand CE, Franklin ME, Sarwer DB. Body dysmorphic disorder and cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118:167e-80e. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000242500.28431.24
  21. Naraghi M, Atari M, Asadollahi H. When aesthetics, surgery, and psychology meet: aesthetic nasal proportions in patients having rhinoplasty and normal adults. Surg J 2016;2:e44-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1579658
  22. Najarian B, Davoodi I. Making validation Scl25, short form Scl90. J Psychol 2001;2:136-49.
  23. Gorney M, Martello J. Patient selection criteria. Clin Plast Surg 1999;26:37-40.
  24. Naraghi M, Atari M. Preliminary findings on gender differences in aesthetic rhinoplasty patients: body appreciation and appearance comparisons. Otolaryngol Open J 2015;1:7-12. https://doi.org/10.17140/OTLOJ-1-103
  25. Naraghi M, Atari M. Gender differences in aesthetic rhinoplasty patients: a study on psychopathological symptoms. Open J Med Psychol 2016;5:1-6. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmp.2016.51001

Cited by

  1. A Review of Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Aesthetic Surgery Patients and the Legal Implications vol.41, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0819-x
  2. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty vol.274, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4359-9
  3. A qualitative study of life events and psychological needs underlying the decision to have cosmetic surgery vol.52, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0091217417703287
  4. The 10-Item Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) for Functional and Cosmetic Rhinoplasty vol.20, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1083
  5. Satisfaction in rhinoplasty: the possible impact of anxiety and functional outcome vol.275, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4860-9
  6. Assessment and the Psychological Aspects for Septorhinoplasty vol.9, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10001-1335
  7. Assessing normal values for the FACE‐Q rhinoplasty module: An observational study vol.43, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13086
  8. Quality of life before and after rhinoplasty surgery measured with SF-36, RSES, and WHOQOL-BREF vol.41, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-018-1392-5
  9. French validation of the FACE‐Q Rhinoplasty module vol.44, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13267
  10. The role of body image in appearance-related cosmetic procedures vol.8, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12968/joan.2019.8.7.318
  11. Body dysmorphic disorder and facial aesthetic treatments in dental practice vol.227, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0901-7
  12. The 10-Point Plan 2021: Updated Concepts for Improved Procedural Safety During Facial Filler Treatments vol.14, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.s315711
  13. Assessing Unrealistic Expectations in Clients Undertaking Minor Cosmetic Procedures: The Development of the Aesthetic Procedure Expectations Scale vol.23, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2020.0247
  14. Examining Preoperative Expectations and Postoperative Satisfaction in Rhinoplasty Patients: A Single-Center Study vol.23, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2020.0406