Archives of Plastic Surgery

  • 제43권4호
  • /
  • Pages.328-338
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2234-6163(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6171(eISSN)
대한성형외과학회 (Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures

  • Headon, Hannah Louise (Department of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, London Breast Institute, Princess Grace Hospital) ;
  • Kasem, Abdul (Department of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Medway NHS Trust) ;
  • Mokbel, Kefah (Department of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, London Breast Institute, Princess Grace Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2015.05.26
  • 심사 : 2016.05.24
  • 발행 : 2016.07.20
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly popular as a procedure for the treatment of breast cancer and as a prophylactic procedure for those at high risk of developing the disease. However, it remains a controversial option due to questions regarding its oncological safety and concerns regarding locoregional recurrence. This systematic review with a pooled analysis examines the current literature regarding NSM, including locoregional recurrence and complication rates. Systematic electronic searches were conducted using the PubMed database and the Ovid database for studies reporting the indications for NSM and the subsequent outcomes. Studies between January 1970 and January 2015 (inclusive) were analysed if they met the inclusion criteria. Pooled descriptive statistics were performed. Seventy-three studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis, yielding 12,358 procedures. After a mean follow up of 38 months (range, 7.4-156 months), the overall pooled locoregional recurrence rate was 2.38%, the overall complication rate was 22.3%, and the overall incidence of nipple necrosis, either partial or total, was 5.9%. Significant heterogeneity was found among the published studies and patient selection was affected by tumour characteristics. We concluded that NSM appears to be an oncologically safe option for appropriately selected patients, with low rates of locoregional recurrence. For NSM to be performed, tumours should be peripherally located, smaller than 5 cm in diameter, located more than 2 cm away from the nipple margin, and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative. A separate histopathological examination of the subareolar tissue and exclusion of malignancy at this site is essential for safe oncological practice. Long-term follow-up studies and prospective cohort studies are required in order to determine the best reconstructive methods.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, et al. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:165-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557369
  2. Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, et al. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:609-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-999-0609-z
  3. Simmons RM, Adamovich TL. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:885-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00035-5
  4. Mallon P, Feron JG, Couturaud B, et al. The role of nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:969-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865a3c
  5. Verheyden CN. Nipple-sparing total mastectomy of large breasts: the role of tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101:1494-500. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199805000-00010
  6. Mustonen P, Lepisto J, Papp A, et al. The surgical and oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30:817-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-7983(04)00143-X
  7. Dao TN, Verheyden CN. TRAM flaps: a reconstructive option after bilateral nipple-sparing total mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116:986-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000178394.77346.53
  8. Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areola complex. Am J Surg 2005;190:907-12.
  9. Palmieri B, Baitchev G, Grappolini S, et al. Delayed nipple-sparing modified subcutaneous mastectomy: rationale and technique. Breast J 2005;11:173-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.21520.x
  10. Caruso F, Ferrara M, Castiglione G, et al. Nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy: sixty-six months follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006;32:937-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2006.05.013
  11. Komorowski AL, Zanini V, Regolo L, et al. Necrotic complications after nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy. World J Surg 2006;30:1410-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0650-4
  12. Mosahebi A, Ramakrishnan V, Gittos M, et al. Aesthetic outcome of different techniques of reconstruction following nipple-areola-preserving envelope mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:796-803. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000251999.52374.09
  13. Denewer A, Farouk O. Can nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with modified extended latissimus dorsi muscular flap improve the cosmetic and functional outcome among patients with breast carcinoma? World J Surg 2007;31:1169-77.
  14. Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg 2008;143:1106-10. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.11.1106
  15. Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008;34:143-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2007.06.010
  16. Sookhan N, Boughey JC, Walsh MF, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at a tertiary center. Am J Surg 2008;196:575-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.022
  17. Regolo L, Ballardini B, Gallarotti E, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: an innovative skin incision for an alternative approach. Breast 2008;17:8-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.040
  18. Voltura AM, Tsangaris TN, Rosson GD, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: critical assessment of 51 procedures and implications for selection criteria. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15: 3396-401. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0102-0
  19. Wijayanayagam A, Kumar AS, Foster RD, et al. Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy. Arch Surg 2008;143:38-45. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.1.38
  20. Stolier A, Stone JC, Moroz K, et al. A comparison of clinical and pathologic assessments for the prediction of occult nipple involvement in nipple-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:128-32. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2511-3
  21. Paepke S, Schmid R, Fleckner S, et al. Subcutaneous mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola skin: broadening the indications. Ann Surg 2009;250:288-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c7d8
  22. Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody Iii HS 3rd, Disa JJ, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J 2009;15:440-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00758.x
  23. Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, et al. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg 2009;249:461-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a044f
  24. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;117:333-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0304-y
  25. Chen CM, Disa JJ, Sacchini V, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:1772-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bd05fd
  26. Yueh JH, Houlihan MJ, Slavin SA, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: evaluation of patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and sensation. Ann Plast Surg 2009;62:586-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819fb1ac
  27. Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg 2009;249:26-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e41a7
  28. Sakamoto N, Fukuma E, Higa K, et al. Early results of an endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:3406-13. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0661-8
  29. Colwell AS, Gadd M, Smith BL, et al. An inferolateral approach to nipple-sparing mastectomy: optimizing mastectomy and reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2010;65:140-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181c1fe77
  30. Radovanovic Z, Radovanovic D, Golubovic A, et al. Early complications after nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis: results of 214 procedures. Scand J Surg 2010;99:115-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/145749691009900302
  31. Kim HJ, Park EH, Lim WS, et al. Nipple areola skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure: a single center study. Ann Surg 2010;251: 493-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c5dc4e
  32. Luo D, Ha J, Latham B, et al. The accuracy of intraoperative subareolar frozen section in nipple-sparing mastectomies. Ochsner J 2010;10:188-92.
  33. Salgarello M, Visconti G, Farallo E. Autologous fat graft in radiated tissue prior to alloplastic reconstruction of the breast: report of two cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010;34:5-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9367-3
  34. Mladenov M, Chervenyakov P, Daskalova I. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (subcutaneal mastectomy with preserving of the areolomammilar complex) like alternative of the modify radical mastectomy in selected cases. Khirurgiia (Sofiia) 2010;(6):23-7.
  35. Rawlani V, Fiuk J, Johnson SA, et al. The effect of incision choice on outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstruction. Can J Plast Surg 2011;19:129-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031101900410
  36. Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:1005-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6456
  37. Harness JK, Vetter TS, Salibian AH. Areola and nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment and risk reduction: report of an initial experience in a community hospital setting. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:917-22. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1365-9
  38. de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:3117-22. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1974-y
  39. Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:1665-70. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1475-4
  40. Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 2011;212:686-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.039
  41. Yang SJ, Eom JS, Lee TJ, et al. Recipient vessel selection in immediate breast reconstruction with free abdominal tissue transfer after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39:216-21. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.3.216
  42. Schneider LF, Chen CM, Stolier AJ, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate free-flap reconstruction in the large ptotic breast. Ann Plast Surg 2012;69:425-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824a45be
  43. Spear SL, Rottman SJ, Seiboth LA, et al. Breast reconstruction using a staged nipple-sparing mastectomy following mastopexy or reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:572-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318241285c
  44. Jensen JA, Lin JH, Kapoor N, et al. Surgical delay of the nipple-areolar complex: a powerful technique to maximize nipple viability following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:3171-6. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2528-7
  45. Kneubil MC, Lohsiriwat V, Curigliano G, et al. Risk of locoregional recurrence in patients with false-negative frozen section or close margins of retroareolar specimen in nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:4117-23. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2514-0
  46. Peled AW, Foster RD, Garwood ER, et al. The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: results of a prospective practice improvement study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:901e-908e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ec447
  47. Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Daniel JR, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technical aspects and aesthetic outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 2012;68:446-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182394bba
  48. Warren Peled A, Foster RD, Stover AC, et al. Outcomes after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction in 657 breasts. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:3402-9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2362-y
  49. Algaithy ZK, Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: can we predict the factors predisposing to necrosis? Eur J Surg Oncol 2012;38:125-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2011.10.007
  50. Wagner JL, Fearmonti R, Hunt KK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:1137-44. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2099-z
  51. Blechman KM, Karp NS, Levovitz C, et al. The lateral inframammary fold incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy: outcomes from over 50 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions. Breast J 2013;19:31-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12043
  52. Tanna N, Broer PN, Weichman KE, et al. Microsurgical breast reconstruction for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:139e-147e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182789b51
  53. Lohsiriwat V, Rotmensz N, Botteri E, et al. Do clinicopathological features of the cancer patient relate with nipple areolar complex necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy? Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:990-6. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2677-8
  54. Sahin I, Isik S, Alhan D, et al. One-staged silicone implant breast reconstruction following bilateral nipple-sparing prophylactic mastectomy in patients at high-risk for breast cancer. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37:303-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-0044-6
  55. Sakurai T, Zhang N, Suzuma T, et al. Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution. Med Oncol 2013;30: 481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-013-0481-3
  56. Fortunato L, Loreti A, Andrich R, et al. When mastectomy is needed: is the nipple-sparing procedure a new standard with very few contraindications? J Surg Oncol 2013;108: 207-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23390
  57. Burdge EC, Yuen J, Hardee M, et al. Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:3294-302. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3174-4
  58. Rulli A, Caracappa D, Barberini F, et al. Oncologic reliability of nipple-sparing mastectomy for selected patients with breast cancer. In Vivo 2013;27:387-94.
  59. Romics L Jr, Stallard S, Weiler-Mithoff E. Oncologic safety of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction: rate and localization of recurrences, and impact of reconstruction techniques. Orv Hetil 2013;154:163-71. https://doi.org/10.1556/OH.2013.29529
  60. Munhoz AM, Aldrighi CM, Montag E, et al. Clinical outcomes following nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: a 12-year experience with an analysis of patient and breast-related factors for complications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;140: 545-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2634-7
  61. Coopey SB, Tang R, Lei L, et al. Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:3218-22. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3152-x
  62. Tancredi A, Ciuffreda L, Petito L, et al. Nipple-areola-complex sparing mastectomy: five years of experience in a single centre. Updates Surg 2013;65:289-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-013-0226-z
  63. Chen J, Lu Q, Wang X, et al. Breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cance]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2013; 27:872-5.
  64. Colwell AS, Tessler O, Lin AM, et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133:496-506. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000438056.67375.75
  65. Stanec Z, Zic R, Budi S, et al. Skin and nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: 15-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 2014;73:485-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31827a30e6
  66. Chattopadhyay D, Gupta S, Jash PK, et al. Skin sparing mastectomy with preservation of nipple areola complex and immediate breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer: a single centre prospective study. Plast Surg Int 2014;2014: 589068.
  67. Leclere FM, Panet-Spallina J, Kolb F, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction in ductal carcinoma in situ: a critical assessment with 41 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014;38:338-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0236-8
  68. Eisenberg RE, Chan JS, Swistel AJ, et al. Pathological evaluation of nipple-sparing mastectomies with emphasis on occult nipple involvement: the Weill-Cornell experience with 325 cases. Breast J 2014;20:15-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12199
  69. Wang F, Peled AW, Garwood E, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an evolution of technique and assessment of outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:3223-30. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3915-z
  70. Kim SW, Lee HK, Kang SM, et al. Short-term outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction using an implant or tissue expander after mastectomy in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer 2016;23:279-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-014-0570-y
  71. Adam H, Bygdeson M, de Boniface J. The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy - a Swedish matched cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014;40:1209-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2014.07.037
  72. Huston TL, Small K, Swistel AJ, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy via an inframammary fold incision for patients with scarring from prior lumpectomy. Ann Plast Surg 2015;74: 652-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000004
  73. Sood S, Elder E, French J. Nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: the Westmead experience. ANZ J Surg 2015;85:363-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12641
  74. Peled AW, Irwin CS, Hwang ES, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:37-41. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3230-0
  75. Poruk KE, Ying J, Chidester JR, et al. Breast cancer recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy: one institution’s experience. Am J Surg 2015;209:212-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.04.001
  76. Yao K, Liederbach E, Tang R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: an interim analysis and review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:370-6.
  77. Endara M, Chen D, Verma K, et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132:1043-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a48b8a
  78. Barton FE Jr, English JM, Kingsley WB, et al. Glandular excision in total glandular mastectomy and modified radical mastectomy: a comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;88: 389-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199109000-00001
  79. Torresan RZ, dos Santos CC, Okamura H, et al. Evaluation of residual glandular tissue after skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:1037-44. https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.11.027
  80. Ho CM, Mak CK, Lau Y, et al. Skin involvement in invasive breast carcinoma: safety of skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:102-7. https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2003.05.001
  81. Agarwal S, Agarwal S, Neumayer L, et al. Therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomy: trends based on a national cancer database. Am J Surg 2014;208:93-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.030
  82. Moon JY, Chang YW, Lee EH, et al. Malignant invasion of the nipple-areolar complex of the breast: usefulness of breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:448-55. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9186
  83. Byon W, Kim E, Kwon J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and clinicopathological factors for the detection of occult nipple involvement in breast cancer patients. J Breast Cancer 2014;17:386-92. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2014.17.4.386
  84. Banerjee A, Gupta S, Bhattacharya N. Preservation of nipple-areola complex in breast cancer: a clinicopathological assessment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:1195-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.08.005
  85. Atiyeh B, Dibo S, Zgheib E, et al. Skin sparing/skin reducing mastectomy (SSM/SRM) and the concept of oncoplastic breast surgery. Int J Surg 2014;12:1115-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.401
  86. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Risk factors associated with recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy for invasive and intraepithelial neoplasia. Ann Oncol 2012;23: 2053-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr566
  87. Panoff JE, Hurley J, Takita C, et al. Risk of locoregional recurrence by receptor status in breast cancer patients receiving modern systemic therapy and post-mastectomy radiation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;128:899-906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1495-1
  88. Chirappapha P, Petit JY, Rietjens M, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: does breast morphological factor related to necrotic complications? Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014; 2:e99. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000038
  89. Buchholz TA, Kronowitz SJ, Kuerer HM. Immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of advanced breast cancer: radiation oncology considerations. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:820-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02574506
  90. Singletary SE, Robb GL. Oncologic safety of skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:95-7. https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2003.01.910
  91. Evans GR, Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, et al. Reconstruction and the radiated breast: is there a role for implants? Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:1111-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199510000-00016
  92. Alperovich M, Choi M, Frey JD, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with prior breast irradiation: are patients at higher risk for reconstructive complications? Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:202e-206e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000321
  93. Gunnarsson GL, Borsen-Koch M, Wamberg P, et al. How to perform a NAC sparing mastectomy using an ADM and an implant. Gland Surg 2014;3:252-7.
  94. Reitsamer R, Peintinger F. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68:162-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.10.012

피인용 문헌

  1. Expanding Eligibility Criteria for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy vol.110, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14423/smj.0000000000000707
  2. Determinants of short and long term outcomes in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy vol.116, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24741
  3. Factors predictive of occult nipple‐areolar complex involvement in patients with carcinoma in situ of the breast vol.116, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24768
  4. Should age impact breast cancer management in young women? Fine tuning of treatment guidelines vol.10, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835918776923
  5. Robotic Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study vol.25, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6555-x
  6. Oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in young patients with breast cancer compared with conventional mastectomy vol.15, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7913
  7. Immediate breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy in an Asian population: Aesthetic outcomes and mitigating nipple-areolar complex necrosis vol.45, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01067
  8. Quality of life and sexual well‐being after nipple sparing mastectomy: A matched comparison of patients using the breast Q vol.118, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25107
  9. Innovations and advancements with prosthetic breast reconstruction vol.24, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12998
  10. Hereditary lobular breast cancer with an emphasis on E-cadherin genetic defect vol.55, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105337
  11. Preoperative MRI evaluation of lesion–nipple distance in breast cancer patients: thresholds for predicting occult nipple–areola complex involvement vol.73, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2018.03.008
  12. Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: Surgical Technique vol.142, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004703
  13. Oncological Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Single-Center Experience of 1989 Patients vol.25, pp.13, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6759-0
  14. An Analysis of Nipple Enhancement at Breast MRI with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation vol.39, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180039
  15. Surgical and oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in an Asian population vol.26, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-018-0908-y
  16. Systematic review of therapeutic nipple‐sparing versus skin‐sparing mastectomy vol.3, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50119
  17. Prospective Evaluation of Residual Breast Tissue After Skin- or Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Results of the SKINI-Trial vol.26, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07259-1
  18. Plastisch-operative und rekonstruktive Eingriffe an der Brust : Indikation und Durchführung vol.52, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-019-4444-4
  19. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Timing and Postoperative Complications vol.26, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07418-4
  20. Increasing Role of Oncoplastic Surgery for Breast Cancer vol.21, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-019-0860-9
  21. Surgical Outcomes in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction vol.8, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000002744
  22. Predicting Ischemic Complications in the Inframammary Approach to Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: The Midclavicular-to-Inframammary Fold Measurement vol.145, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006439
  23. Types of Mastectomies and Immediate Reconstructions for Ipsilateral Breast Local Recurrences vol.10, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.567298
  24. Oncologic Safety and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy vol.230, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.028
  25. Young Women With Breast Cancer: Treatment, Care, and Nursing Implications vol.24, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1188/20.cjon.139-147
  26. The modern approach to the nipple‐sparing mastectomy vol.122, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25909
  27. Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Robotic Latissimus Dorsi Flap Harvest: Technique and Results vol.27, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350620917916
  28. Nipple‐sparing mastectomy: A review of outcomes at a single institution vol.26, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.14088
  29. Comparing Nipple-sparing Mastectomy to Secondary Nipple Reconstruction : A Multi-institutional Study vol.274, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003577
  30. The Landmark Series: Mastectomy Trials (Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing and Reconstruction Landmark Trials) vol.28, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09052-x
  31. Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Patients with Breast Cancer vol.13, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-020-00399-4
  32. Prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: results of a French prospective trial vol.108, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaa082
  33. Oncological safety of therapeutic ‘nipple-sparing mastectomy’ followed by reconstruction: a systematic review vol.121, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2021.1922829
  34. Locoregional recurrence in skin‐sparing and nipple‐sparing mastectomies vol.125, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26725