대한치과교정학회지 (The korean journal of orthodontics)

  • 제46권4호
  • /
  • Pages.220-227
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2234-7518(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-372X(eISSN)
대한치과교정학회 (The Korean Association Of Orthodontists)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Translation and validation of the Turkish version of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire

  • Aglarci, Cahide (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sifa University) ;
  • Baysal, Asli (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Katip Celebi University) ;
  • Demirci, Kadir (Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University) ;
  • Dikmen, Ferhan (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sifa University) ;
  • Aglarci, Ali Vasfi (Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University)
  • 투고 : 2015.10.30
  • 심사 : 2015.12.14
  • 발행 : 2016.07.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The aim of this study was to translate the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) into Turkish, validate the questionnaire, and provide a cross-cultural adaptation. Methods: The translation process included the following steps, which were performed by a translation committee: (1) translation into Turkish, (2) back translation into English, (3) pretesting, and (4) cross-cultural adaptation. The Turkish version of the PIDAQ was produced subsequent to the translation process. Validity and reliability were measured using the Perception of Occlusion Scale and the aesthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. The questionnaire was administered to 260 individuals (age range, 18-30 years; mean age, $20.50{\pm}1.9$ years). Structural validity was assessed via factor analysis, and internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Results: Factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure, with factor loadings for included items ranging from 0.380 to 0.868. Few questions were shuffled among domains various factor loadings. Cronbach's alphas for the Turkish version of the PIDAQ ranged from 0.534 to 0.904. Mean scores for the PIDAQ subscale and total scores differed significantly according to Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and Perception of Occlusion Scale scores. Conclusions: This study provided a Turkish version of the PIDAQ, which could be a useful tool in the evaluation of the psychosocial impact of malocclusion in young Turkish adults.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Goes PS, Watt R, Hardy RG, Sheiham A. The prevalence and severity of dental pain in 14-15 year old Brazilian schoolchildren. Community Dent Health 2007;24:217-24.
  2. Sheiham A. Oral health, general health and quality of life. Bull World Health Organ 2005;83:644.
  3. Bernabe E, Kresevic VD, Cabrejos SC, Flores-Mir F, Flores-Mir C. Dental esthetic self-perception in young adults with and without previous orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2006;76:412-6.
  4. Bucci R, Rongo R, Zito E, Galeotti A, Valletta R, D'Anto V. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ). Qual Life Res 2015;24:747-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0807-4
  5. Klages U, Claus N, Wehrbein H, Zentner A. Development of a questionnaire for assessment of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in young adults. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:103-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji083
  6. Singh VP, Singh R. Translation and validation of a Nepalese version of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetic Questionnaire (PIDAQ). J Orthod 2014;41:6-12. https://doi.org/10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000079
  7. Lin H, Quan C, Guo C, Zhou C, Wang Y, Bao B. Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:354-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr136
  8. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. A socio-dental approach to assessing children's orthodontic needs. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:393-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji114
  9. Birkeland K, Boe OE, Wisth PJ. Relationship between occlusion and satisfaction with dental appearance in orthodontically treated and untreated groups. A longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:509-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/22.5.509
  10. Phillips C, Beal KN. Self-concept and the perception of facial appearance in children and adolescents seeking orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2009;79:12-6. https://doi.org/10.2319/071307-328.1
  11. Bellot-Arcis C, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM. Psychosocial impact of malocclusion in Spanish adolescents. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:193-200. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.4.193
  12. Montiel-Company JM, Bellot-Arcis C, Almerich-Silla JM. Validation of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire (Pidaq) in Spanish adolescents. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18:e168-73.
  13. Sardenberg F, Oliveira AC, Paiva SM, Auad SM, Vale MP. Validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:270-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq066
  14. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:309-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035999
  15. Peters M1, Passchier J. Translating instruments for cross-cultural studies in headache research. Headache 2006;46:82-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00298.x
  16. Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bucquet D, Bullinger M, et al. International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project. Qual Life Res 1992;1:349-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434949
  17. Klages U, Kianifard S, Ulusoy O, Wehrbein H. Anxiety sensitivity as predictor of pain in patients undergoing restorative dental procedures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2006;34:139-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00265.x
  18. Streiner DL. Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. Can J Psychiatry 1994;39:135-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674379403900303
  19. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research: principles and methods. 5th ed. Philadephia: Lippincott; 1995.
  20. Sayin MO, Turkkahraman H. Malocclusion and crowding in an orthodontically referred Turkish population. Angle Orthod 2004;74:635-9.
  21. Ucuncu N, Ertugay E. The use of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment need (IOTN) in a school population and referred population. J Orthod 2001;28:45-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/28.1.45
  22. Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC Oral Health 2011;11:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-11-6
  23. Altun C, Guven G, Basak F, Akbulut E. Evaluation of children in the age group of 6 to 11 with respect to oral-dental health. Gulhane Med J 2005;47:114-8.

피인용 문헌

  1. Development and validation of a new condition-specific instrument for evaluation of smile esthetics-related quality of life vol.30, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12362
  2. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire vol.17, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1188-8
  3. Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) for adolescents vol.79, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1823014