DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biodiesel Production: Utilization of Loofah Sponge to Immobilize Rhizopus chinensis CGMCC #3.0232 Cells as a Whole-Cell Biocatalyst

  • He, Qiyang (Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University) ;
  • Xia, Qianjun (Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University) ;
  • Wang, Yuejiao (Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University) ;
  • Li, Xun (Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University) ;
  • Zhang, Yu (Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University) ;
  • Hu, Bo (Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota) ;
  • Wang, Fei (Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University)
  • Received : 2016.01.27
  • Accepted : 2016.04.16
  • Published : 2016.07.28

Abstract

Rhizopus chinensis cells immobilized on loofah (Luffa cylindrica) sponges were used to produce biodiesel via the transesterification of soybean oil. In whole-cell immobilization, loofah sponge is considered to be a superior alternative to conventional biomass carriers because of its biodegradable and renewable properties. During cell cultivation, Rhizopus chinensis mycelia can spontaneously and firmly adhere to the surface of loofah sponge particles. The optimal conditions for processing 9.65 g soybean oil at 40℃ and 180 rpm using a 3:1 methanol-to-oil molar ratio were found to be 8% cell addition and 3-10% water content (depending on the oil's weight). Under optimal conditions, an over 90% methyl ester yield was achieved after the first reaction batch. The operational stability of immobilized Rhizopus chinensis cells was assayed utilizing a 1:1 methanol-to-oil molar ratio, thus resulting in a 16.5-fold increase in half-life when compared with immobilized cells of the widely studied Rhizopus oryzae. These results suggest that transesterification of vegetable oil using Rhizopus chinensis whole cells immobilized onto loofah sponge is an effective approach for biodiesel production.

Keywords

Introduction

Reliance on diminishing petroleum reserves has stimulated the development of alternate energy sources, such as hydrogen and alcohols [30,31]. One such important potential substitute for conventional fossil fuels is biodiesel, which has the advantage of being nontoxic, renewable, and biodegradable [21]. Biodiesel is commonly referred to as a mono-alkyl ester, which is synthesized mainly via the transesterification of animal fats or vegetable oils that contain short-chain alcohols, such as methanol or ethanol [4,14,25].

Current industrial-scale biodiesel production employs chemical catalysts (alkali in particular), but this process has several drawbacks, such as a large intake of energy and methanol and a negative impact on the environment [8,10,36]. The use of lipase catalysts offers a number of advantages for overcoming the shortcomings of chemically catalyzed processes [10,11,39].

Extra- and intracellular lipases are the two major classes of enzymatic biocatalysts [2,37]. Extracellular lipase is an enzyme isolated from microorganism broth after fermentation, and then purified [2]. Unfortunately, the extraction process of this lipase is expensive, which is an unavoidable hurdle for its development in biodiesel production [8,23]. Intracellular lipase is an enzyme commonly employed in whole-cell processes [10]. Compared with extracellular lipase, whole-cell lipase has drawn increasing attention for its low cost, since it avoids the multifaceted processes required for extracellular lipase isolation and purification [15,16]. Furthermore, use of whole cells as biocatalysts can provide a more stable catalytic environment for lipase [29,35].

Immobilization of whole cells onto matrices further reduces the cost of biodiesel production by offering reusability of the biocatalysts [6]. It has been demonstrated that porous materials like polyurethane foam [22], polyethylene plastic [6], and polyacrylamide gel [13] can immobilize lipase-producing filamentous fungi for repeated use. However, these cell supporters are polymer materials that are not biodegradable after batch reactions, thus producing potential environmental wastes and increased overall costs. Therefore, a commonly available and inexpensive material with renewability and biodegradability is required as a cell supporter for biodiesel production.

Loofah (Luffa cylindrica) is a bountiful and cheap vegetable because it is grown in most tropical and subtropical countries. The vegetable is often peeled and desiccated to produce a porous sponge. The sponge consists of an open fibrous support network that offers the immobilized cells immediate and sufficient contact to the surrounding aqueous medium [34]. Since the main component is lignocellulose, the sponge can be completely biodegraded via natural processes aided by microorganisms [32]. In our previous study, loofah sponge was shown to be an advantageous carrier material in whole-cell immobilization for biodiesel production [18].

Many filamentous fungi species like Rhizopus oryzae (R. oryzae) [17], Aspergillus niger [3], and Mucor circinelloides [1] have been studied as immobilized whole-cell biocatalysts for biodiesel production. Another lipase-producing fungus with an exceptional ability for catalyzing ester synthesis, Rhizopus chinensis (R. chinensis), has not been extensively investigated as a biocatalyst in whole-cell form for producing biodiesel. A previous study reported that in a solvent-free system, freely suspended R. chinensis whole cells can catalyze refined vegetable oil methanolysis rather efficiently, with the peak methyl ester yield reaching 86.0% [19]. However, with no immobilization, the remaining catalytic ability of this unrecyclable biocatalyst is unknown beyond the first reaction batch.

This study utilized loofah sponge particles (LSPs) in the form of whole-cell biocatalysts as biomass support particles (BSPs) in order to immobilize R. chinensis CGMCC #3.0232 for biodiesel production. The biocatalyst’s catalytic performance and the immobilized performance of LSPs were thoroughly evaluated. Additionally, the influence of LSPs on biomass immobilization, the effects of the biocatalyst and the water content during methanolysis, and the ability to reuse the immobilized cells were examined.

 

Materials and Methods

Culture Medium, Microorganisms, and BSPs

R. chinensis CGMCC #3.0232 was obtained from the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC; China). The basal medium consisted of the following components (reported in w/v): 3% refined soybean oil, 7% yeast extract, 0.05% MgSO4·7H2O, 0.1% NaNO3, and 0.1% KH2PO4. Soybean oil was obtained from a local market in Nanjing (China) and determined to have an average molecular weight of 883 g/mol. Yeast extract was obtained from Oxoid (UK). Heptadecanoic acid methyl ester was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (MO, USA). Loofah sponge (Luokang Co., China) was cut into cubic pieces (5-7 mm) beforehand for use as BSPs and mixed with the medium in a flask after prior sterilization of all components. All of the additional reagents were certified analytical grade, and they were attained commercially.

Cell Immobilization

Flasks (250 ml), each containing 50 ml of the basal medium with differing LSP quantities (from 1.00-2.00 g), were inoculated by aseptically transferring about 1 million R. chinensis sp ores from the agar plate, and then incubated in a reciprocal shaker at 30℃ and 180 rpm for roughly 72 h. Filtration was use to isolate the immobilized cells. After being washed with tap water for 0.5 min, the immobilized cells were frozen in a -80℃ refrigerator, and dried in a freeze dryer (FDU-1200 model; Eyela, Japan) for about 24 h. A scanning electron microscope (JSM-7600F model; JEOL, Japan) was used to examine the biocatalyst’s exterior morphology.

The net weight of the LSP-immobilized biomass was calculated as the LSP’s change in weight before and after they were immobilized. The data were reproduced for three independent samples for a minimum of three trials.

Methanolysis Reaction

Methanolysis reactions were performed at 40℃ in 50 ml bottles in a reciprocal shaker that was set at 180 rpm. The reaction mixture was composed of 9.65 g of soybean oil, various amounts of phosphate buffer (PB; pH 7.5, 0.1 M), and differing quantities of the dried immobilized cells (ranging 2-10%, depending on the oil’s weight). A minimum of three molar equivalents of methanol are needed to successfully react the oil to the corresponding methyl esters, and the molar equivalent of methanol against 9.65 g of soybean oil was 0.35 g [7]. Subsequently, 0.35 g of methanol was respectively added at periods of 0, 24, and 48 h. At the end of each reaction, the biocatalysts were rinsed with n-hexane and tap water, and then dried for 24 h at 25℃ for each duplicated batch.

The biocatalyst’s catalytic half-life was calculated using the Arrhenius equation (Eq. (1)) and the half-time equation (Eq. (2)) by fitting to a deactivation model of first order:

in which A is the yield of methyl ester at time t, A0 is the yield of methyl ester after the first batch reaction, t is the reaction time, Kd is the coefficient of deactivation, and t1/2 is the catalytic half-life [18].

Gas Chromatography (GC) Analysis

Samples (100 μl) were extracted from the reaction mixture at the specified time intervals and examined by 7890A capillary GC (Agilent, USA). The GC machine contained a HP-5 capillary column supplied by Agilent with the dimensions 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm. The samples were centrifuged for 3 min at 11,500 ×g, and then the top layer of the sample was isolated for GC analysis. With heptadecanoic acid methyl ester serving as the internal standard for analysis, exactly 30 μl of the sample was thoroughly dissolved in 270 μl of n-hexane, and then mixed with 300 μl of 1 g/l heptadecanoic acid methyl ester (n-hexane as the solvent). The column temperature was held at 170℃ for 0.5 min, then heated at 3℃/min to 200℃, held at 200℃ for 10 min, and then heated at 20℃/min to 260℃. The injector temperature was set at 250℃, and the detector temperature was set at 260℃.

 

Results and Discussion

Cell Immobilization

The main ingredients of loofah sponge are cellulose (55-90%), hemicellulose (8-30%), and lignin (10-23%) [33]. The combination of these ingredients forms a stable lignocellulosic material with an open structure (Figs. 1A and 1C), which offers the immobilized cells immediate and sufficient contact to the surrounding aqueous medium and thus favors nutrient diffusion and oxygen transfer for cell growth [27,34]. Since numerous hydroxyl groups are present in lignocellulose and the main constituents of cell walls are hydrophilic polysaccharides, excessive hydrogen bonds between two surfaces result in another advantage of loofah sponge for cell adherence [26]. Comparing Figs. 1C and 1D, we can clearly see that after cultivation, a large number of R. chinensis mycelia were attached to the LSPs, thus signifying preferable immobilization conditions and indicating that the mycelia would not easily detach from the LSPs despite vigorous agitation. No evident cell detachment from the LSPs was detected in subsequent biodiesel production.

Fig. 1.Photographs and surface scanning electron microscopy images of LSPs (A and C: LSPs; B and D: LSPs with dried immobilized cells).

Effects of LSPs on Biomass Immobilization

Owing to elevated porosity and low density, the use of small amounts of LPSs can provide a large surface area for cell immobilization [33]. In order to study how cultivation cell immobilization is affected by LSP addition, varying quantities of LSPs were added to 50 ml of base medium. As displayed in Fig. 2, LSP addition caused an increase of the weight of immobilized cells. No macroscopic mycelia were observed as freely suspended biomass in the medium at the end of cultivation. This indicates that loofah sponge has a positive effect on fungi growth, and R. chinensis mycelia prefer to adhere to the surface of LPSs, rather than be suspended in the aqueous medium. In contrast, the concentration of immobilized cells decreased gradually with increasing LSP addition (Fig. 2). This is most likely attributable to the dispersion of fungi biomass caused by increasing LPS addition.

Fig. 2.Effect of LSP addition on immobilized biomass. Culture conditions: 30℃, 180 rpm for 72 h.

Continued addition of LSPs increased immobilized cells, but low cell concentration on LSPs resulted in the waste of carriers. Although the biocatalysts with a full mycelia attachment can be harvested with a small number of LSP additions, low cell weight reflects the underutilization of nutrients in the medium, which increases costs. Based on these two considerations, 1.25-1.50 g of LSPs was utilized in successive trials.

Effects of Biocatalyst Addition on Methyl Ester Yield

The biocatalyst addition is an important parameter for methyl ester yield. In order to examine the optimum amount of biocatalyst, different amounts of dried immobilized cells were brought in to catalyze the reaction. Based on the fact that a high concentration of methanol can result in permanent lipase denaturation [8,12,39], 0.35 g of methanol was added stepwise three times to the reaction mixture with 10% water content (PB; pH 7.5, 0.1 M; depending on the oil’s weight). As illustrated in Fig. 3, the final methyl ester yield increased after a 72-h reaction when the cell addition was increased from 2% to 8%. However, it did not keep increasing when the cell addition was increased beyond 8%, but instead decreased slightly. Higher cell additions lead to higher lipase amount and faster transformation [5], but very high cell additions can block the mass transfer [20]. Moreover, excessive enzymes could delay lipase activity [9].

Fig. 3.Effect of biocatalyst addition on methanolysis for production of biodiesel. Reaction parameters: 9.65 g of soybean oil, 180 rpm, 40℃, 10% water content (PB; pH 7.5, 0.1 M; depending on the oil’s weight), addition of 0.35 g of methanol stepwise at periods of 0, 24, and 48 h, respectively, and varying amounts of dried immobilized cells.

Effect of Water Content on Methyl Ester Yield

The level of water is known to be a crucial parameter in a solvent-free system. In this study, the effect of water content was examined at 0%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% (depending on the oil’s weight) in PB (pH 7.5, 0.1 M). Lipase is an enzyme that catalyzes the reaction at the water/oil interface, so a suitable content of water results in an efficient lipase-catalyzed methanolysis reaction by supplying a sufficient number of water/oil interfaces for the reaction to take place [5,24]. In addition, with a low water content, an insufficient amount of water would lead to the permanent inactivation of lipase, caused by denaturation of the enzyme by high concentrations of methanol [8]. Because R. chinensis lipase displays 1(3)-regiospecifity [28], acyl migration can spontaneously occur in any system that contains water, thus improving the final methyl ester yield in the methanolysis reaction. This might explain why the lowest methyl ester yield, 60.2%, was obtained in the absence of water after a 72-h reaction (Fig. 4). As shown in Fig. 4, the methyl ester yield peaked at around 91%, when the water content was 3-10%. A further increase in the water content from 10% to 20% decreased the yield of methyl ester. As water is one of the products in the esterification of methanol and free fatty acids, an excessive water content would inhibit the reaction’s progress [24]. Additionally, the reaction efficiency would decrease owing to the obstruction of mass transfer caused by excess water content [5]. Since a higher water content prevents irreversible lipase denaturation by diluting methanol into a lower concentration throughout the reaction, 10% water content was utilized in successive biodiesel production experiments.

Fig. 4.Effect of water content on methanolysis for production of biodiesel. Reaction parameters: 9.65 g of soybean oil, 180 rpm, 40℃, 8% dried immobilized cells (depending on the oil’s weight), addition of 0.35 g of methanol stepwise at periods of 0, 24, and 48 h, respectively, and varying contents of water (PB; pH 7.5, 0.1 M; depending on the oil’s weight).

Reusability of LSP-Immobilized Cells

The overall cost of the process can be drastically reduced by reuse of the immobilized cells [38]. Thus, 8% of dried immobilized cells (depending on the oil’s weight) was added to a mixture with 10% water content (PB; pH 7.5, 0.1 M; depending on the oil’s weight), composed of 9.65 g of soybean oil and 0.35 g of methanol, for replicated reactions in each batch cycle. In our previous study, the reusability of LSP-immobilized R. oryzae cells was investigated by carrying out the reaction under similar conditions [18]. The results of R. oryzae were used as a reference for measuring the catalytic performance of immobilized R. chinensis cells. For immobilized R. oryzae cells, we determined that the methyl ester yield decreased gradually as the batch proceeded and resulted in an methyl ester yield of only 7.7% after 12 cycles of reuse (Fig. 5A). Comparatively, the catalytic performance of immobilized R. chinensis cells was quite stable and gave an methyl ester content in the reaction mixture of 29.6% after 12 cycles of reuse when an identical amount of immobilized R. chinensis cells was utilized as a biocatalyst (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5.Repeated methanolysis with R. chinensis and R. oryzae [18] immobilized cells. Reaction conditions: 9.65 g of soybean oil, 180 rpm, 40℃ (R. chinensis) or 35℃ (R. oryzae), 8% immobilized dried cells (depending on the oil’s weight), 10% water content (PB, 0.1 M, pH 7.5 (R. chinensis) or 6.8 (R. oryzae); depending on the oil’s weight). (A) Methanolysis was performed with 0.35 g of methanol for every batch cycle. (B) Methanolysis was performed with addition of 0.35 g of methanol stepwise at periods of 0, 24, and 48 h, respectively, in every batch cycle.

The biocatalyst’s catalytic stability was calculated by normalizing Kd and t1/2 in the Arrhenius equation and fitting to the deactivation model of first order. For the immobilized R. oryzae cells, a Kd of 12.89 × 10-2 d-1 and a t1/2 of 5 days were calculated, whereas immobilized R. chinensis cells had a t1/2 of 89 days and a Kd of 0.78 × 10-2 d-1 (Fig. 6). Compared with immobilized R. oryzae cells, which have been widely studied for biodiesel production, the t1/2 of immobilized R. chinensis was greater by a factor of 16.5, suggesting that R. chinensis is more suitable than R. oryzae for these applications. It has been documented that intracellular lipase leakage from the R. oryzae cells happens consistently under continuous operation [7]. The catalytic activity of R. chinensis appeared to be retained, presumably due to reduced intracellular lipase leakage.

Fig. 6.Deactivation model of R. chinensis and R. oryzae [18] immobilized cells during repeated methanolysis. Reaction parameters are as defined for Fig. 5A.

To further compare the catalytic performance of immobilized R. chinensis and R. oryzae cells, time courses of methanolysis catalyzed by immobilized R. chinensis cells with three stepwise additions of methanol were performed in each batch reaction for repeated reactions. As displayed in Fig. 5B, in the case of immobilized R. oryzae cells, a methyl ester yield of 4.1% was detected at the completion of the sixth batch cycle, which implies that the catalytic activity had substantially decreased. Comparatively, immobilized R. chinensis cells showed a relatively stable catalytic activity throughout the six batch cycles, with methyl ester yield reaching 65.6-90.7% in each cycle during the 72-h reaction.

He et al. [19] used freely suspended R. chinensis whole cells to catalyze the methanolysis of refined vegetable oil for biodiesel production. The reaction was carried out with three stepwise additions of methanol in a solvent-free system. Under optimal conditions, the highest methyl ester yield was found to be 86.0% after a 72-h reaction, which is lower than ours (90.7%) at the end of the first batch reaction. This is mostly attributed to abundant water/oil interfaces generated by the high hydrophilicity of loofah sponge [26], which provided sufficient reaction sites.

These findings indicate that immobilized R. chinensis cells have a more stable catalytic performance for catalyzing methanolysis than the widely used immobilized R. oryzae cells, and could be used as a whole-cell biocatalyst for practical biodiesel production. Furthermore, similarly to R. oryzae, loofah sponges can also be utilized in biodiesel production as a biomass supporter for immobilization of R. chinensis cells. Loofah sponge is renewable and biodegradable, thus making the whole process less costly and more environmentally friendly.

References

  1. Andrade GS, Carvalho AF, Romero C, Oliveira P, de Castro H. 2014. Mucor circinelloides whole-cells as a biocatalyst for the production of ethyl esters based on babassu oil. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 37: 2539-2548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1231-4
  2. Andrade GSS, Freitas L, Oliveira PC, de Castro HF. 2012. Screening, immobilization and utilization of whole cell biocatalysts to mediate the ethanolysis of babassu oil. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 84: 183-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2012.02.011
  3. Arai S, Nakashima K, Tanino T, Ogino C, Kondo A, Fukuda H. 2010. Production of biodiesel fuel from soybean oil catalyzed by fungus whole-cell biocatalysts in ionic liquids. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 46: 51-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2009.08.008
  4. Aransiola EF, Ojumu TV, Oyekola OO, Madzimbamuto TF, Ikhu-Omoregbe DIO. 2014. A review of current technology for biodiesel production: state of the art. Biomass Bioenerg. 61: 276-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.11.014
  5. Arumugam A, Ponnusami V. 2014. Biodiesel production from Calophyllum inophyllum oil using lipase p roducing Rhizopus oryzae cells immobilized within reticulated foams. Renew. Energ. 64: 276-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.016
  6. Athalye S, Sharma-Shivappa R, Peretti S, Kolar P, Davis JP. 2013. Producing biodiesel from cottonseed oil using Rhizopus oryzae ATCC #34612 whole cell biocatalysts: culture media and cultivation period optimization. Energy Sustain. Dev. 17: 331-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2013.03.009
  7. Ban K, Hama S, Nishizuka K, Kaieda M, Matsumoto T, Kondo A, et al. 2002. Repeated use of whole-cell biocatalysts immobilized within biomass support particles for biodiesel fuel production. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 17: 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-1177(02)00023-1
  8. Ban K, Kaieda M, Matsumoto T, Kondo A, Fukuda H. 2001. Whole cell biocatalyst for biodiesel fuel production utilizing Rhizopus oryzae cells immobilized within biomass support particles. Biochem. Eng. J. 8: 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-703X(00)00133-9
  9. Calero J, Verdugo C, Luna D, Sancho ED, Luna C, Posadillo A, et al. 2014. Selective ethanolysis of sunflower oil with Lipozyme RM IM, an immobilized Rhizomucor miehei lipase, to obtain a biodiesel-like biofuel, which avoids glycerol production through the monoglyceride formation. New Biotechnol. 31: 596-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2014.02.008
  10. Carvalho AKF, Faria ELP, Rivaldi JD, Andrade GSS, de Oliveira PC, de Castro HF. 2015. Performance of whole-cells lipase derived from Mucor circinelloides as a catalyst in the ethanolysis of non-edible vegetable oils under batch and continuous run conditions. Ind. Crops. Prod. 67: 287-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.01.035
  11. Du W, Xu YY, Liu DH, Li ZB. 2005. Study on acyl migration in immobilized lipozyme TL-catalyzed transesterification of soybean oil for biodiesel production. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 37: 68-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2005.09.008
  12. Du W, Xu Y, Liu D, Zeng J. 2004. Comparative study on lipase-catalyzed transformation of soybean oil for biodiesel production with different acyl acceptors. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 30: 125-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2004.04.004
  13. Ellaiah P, Prabhakar T, Ramakrishna B, Taleb AT, Adinarayana K. 2004. Production of lipase by immobilized cells of Aspergillus niger. Process Biochem. 39: 525-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00340-5
  14. Fukuda H, Kondo A, Noda H. 2001. Biodiesel fuel production by transesterification of oils. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 92: 405-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(01)80288-7
  15. Fukuda H, Kondo A, Tamalampudi S. 2009. Bioenergy: sustainable fuels from biomass by yeast and fungal whole-cell biocatalysts. Biochem. Eng. J. 44: 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2008.11.016
  16. Hama S, Kondo A. 2013. Enzymatic biodiesel production: an overview of potential feedstocks and process development. Bioresour. Technol. 135: 386-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.014
  17. Hama S, Yamaji H, Fukumizu T, Numata T, Tamalampudi S, Kondo A, et al. 2007. Biodiesel-fuel production in a packed-bed reactor using lipase-producing Rhizopus oryzae cells immobilized within biomass support particles. Biochem. Eng. J. 34: 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2006.12.013
  18. He Q, Shi H, Gu H, Naka G, Ding H, Li X, et al. 2016. Immobilization of Rhizopus oryzae LY6 onto loofah sponge as a whole-cell biocatalyst for biodiesel production. BioResources 11: 850-860.
  19. He Q, Xu Y, Teng Y, Wang D. 2008. Biodiesel production catalyzed by whole-cell lipase from Rhizopus chinensis. Chin. J. Catal. 29: 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(08)60015-7
  20. Huang D, Han S, Han Z, Lin Y. 2012. Biodiesel production catalyzed by Rhizomucor miehei lipase-displaying Pichia pastoris whole cells in an isooctane system. Biochem. Eng. J. 63: 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2010.08.009
  21. Juan JC, Kartika DA, Wu TY, Hin TYY. 2011. Biodiesel production from jatropha oil by catalytic and non-catalytic approaches: an overview. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 452-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.093
  22. Li W, Du W, Liu D. 2007. Rhizopus oryzae IFO 4697 whole cell catalyzed methanolysis of crude and acidified rapeseed oils for biodiesel production in tert-butanol system. Process Biochem. 42: 1481-1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2007.05.015
  23. Li W, Du W, Liu D, Yao Y. 2008. Study on factors influencing stability of whole cell during biodiesel production in solvent-free and tert-butanol system. Biochem. Eng. J. 41: 111-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2008.04.003
  24. Lin YH, Luo JJ, Hwang JSC, Liau PR, Lu WJ, Lee HT. 2011. The influence of free fatty acid intermediate on biodiesel production from soybean oil by whole cell biocatalyst. Biomass Bioenerg. 35: 2217-2223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.039
  25. Ma F, Hanna MA. 1999. Biodiesel production: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 70: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00025-5
  26. Martinez CO, Ruiz SP, Fenelon VC, de Morais GR, Baesso ML, Matioli G. 2016. Characterization of curdlan produced by Agrobacterium sp. IFO 13140 cells immobilized in a loofa sponge matrix, and application of this biopolymer in the development of functional yogurt. J. Sci. Food Agric. 96: 2410-2417. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7357
  27. Meleigy SA, Khalaf MA 2009. Biosynthesis of gibberellic acid from milk permeate in repeated batch operation by a mutant Fusarium moniliforme cells immobilized on loofa sponge. Bioresour. Technol. 100: 374-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.024
  28. Nakashima T, Fukuda H, Kyotani S, Morikawa H. 1988. Culture conditions for intracellular lipase production by Rhizopus chinensis and its immobilization within biomass support particles. J. Ferment. Technol. 66: 441-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/0385-6380(88)90012-X
  29. Parawira W. 2009. Biotechnological production of biodiesel fuel using biocatalysed transesterification: a review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 29: 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388550902823674
  30. Patel SKS, Kumar P, Singh M, Lee JK, Kalia VC. 2015. Integrative approach to produce hydrogen and polyhydroxy alkanoate from biowaste using defined bacterial cultures. Bioresour. Technol. 176: 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.029
  31. Patel SKS, Mardina P, Kim S-Y, Lee J-K, Kim I-W. 2016. Biological methanol production by a type II methanotroph Methylocystis bryophila. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26: 714-724. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1601.01013
  32. Patel SKS, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC. 2010. Dark fermentative hydrogen production by defined mixed microbial cultures immobilized on lignocellulosic waste materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35: 10674-10681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.025
  33. Saeed A, Iqbal M. 2013. Loofa (Luffa cylindrica) sponge: review of development of the biomatrix as a tool for biotechnological applications. Biotechnol. Progress 29: 573-600. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.1702
  34. Saudagar PS, Shaligram NS, Singhal RS. 2008. Immobilization of Streptomyces clavuligerus on loofah sponge for the production of clavulanic acid. Bioresour. Technol. 99: 2250-2253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.004
  35. Shimada Y, Watanabe Y, Sugihara A, Tominaga Y. 2002. Enzymatic alcoholysis for biodiesel fuel production and application of the reaction to oil processing. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 17: 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-1177(02)00020-6
  36. Sun T, Du W, Liu D. 2011. Comparative study on stability of whole cells during biodiesel production in solvent-free system. Process Biochem. 46: 661-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2010.11.006
  37. Surendhiran D, Vijay M, Sirajunnisa AR. 2014. Biodiesel production from marine microalga Chlorella salina using whole cell yeast immobilized on sugarcane bagasse. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2: 1294-1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.05.004
  38. Yoshida A, Hama S, Tamadani N, Fukuda H, Kondo A. 2012. Improved performance of a packed-bed reactor for biodiesel production through whole-cell biocatalysis employing a high-lipase-expression system. Biochem. Eng. J. 63: 76-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2011.11.003
  39. Zeng J, Du W, Liu X, Liu D, Dai L. 2006. Study on the effect of cultivation parameters and pretreatment on Rhizopus oryzae cell-catalyzed transesterification of vegetable oils for biodiesel production. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 43: 15-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.03.007

Cited by

  1. Efficient (3R)-Acetoin Production from meso-2,3-Butanediol Using a New Whole-Cell Biocatalyst with Co-Expression of meso-2,3-Butanediol Dehydrogenase, NADH Oxidase, and Vitreoscilla Hemoglobin vol.27, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1608.08063
  2. Application of loofah sponge three-dimensional cage-shape activated carbon fiber with high strength in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell vol.10, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5027703
  3. An encapsulated report on enzyme-assisted transesterification with an allusion to lipase vol.11, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-021-03003-3