한국산학기술학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)

  • 제17권6호
  • /
  • Pages.81-88
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1975-4701(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4688(eISSN)
한국산학기술학회 (The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

충청권 대학생의 감각처리 중재 후 삶의 질

Quality of Life in Chungcheong area University Students according to their Sensory Processing Intervention

  • 이지현 (영동대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 이태용 (충남대학교 의학전문대학원 예방의학교실) ;
  • 김영란 (원광보건대학교 방사선과)
  • Lee, Ji-Hyun (Department of Occupational Therapy, Youngdong University) ;
  • Lee, Tae-Yong (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Chungnam National University School of Medicine and Research Institute for Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kim, Young-Ran (Department of Radiology, Wonkwang Health Science University)
  • 투고 : 2016.03.31
  • 심사 : 2016.06.02
  • 발행 : 2016.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 대학생의 감각처리능력을 조사하고 그 중 감각처리능력에 문제가 있는 대상을 선별하여 일상생활에서 스스로 실천 할 수 있는 감각처리중재 방법을 교육한 후 삶의 질에 영향을 미치는지 알아보고자 하였다. 연구대상은 2013년 5월 초 충청지역에 소재한 3개 대학의 동일 계열 전공 대학생 230명으로 하였다. 230명 모든 대상자에게 감각처리능력, 개인적 특성, 삶의 질에 대해 설문조사를 실시하고 감각처리능력에 문제가 있는 32명의 대상자를 각각 16명씩 실험군과 대조군으로 구분하여, 실험군에게는 감각처리 중재를 실시하고 대조군에게는 중재를 실시하지 않았다. 감각처리 중재 방법을 6주 동안 스스로 시행 한 후 삶의 질을 재평가 하였다. 연구 결과 중재 후 삶의 질 총 점수는 실험군 98.69점, 대조군 84.81점(p=0.001), 신체적 건강 점수는 실험군 16.43점, 대조군 14.64점(p=0.008), 심리적 건강 점수는 실험군 14.71점, 대조군 11.75점(p<0.001), 사회적 점수는 실험군 14.67점, 대조군 13.17점(p=0.032), 생활환경 점수는 실험군 14.66점, 대조군 12.34점(p=0.006)으로 나타났다. 실험군은 삶의 질 모든 영역에서 유의하게 점수가 향상되었고 대조군은 삶의 질에 변화가 없었다. 감각처리 문제를 가진 대상자에게 일상생활에서 실천 가능한 감각처리중재 방법을 교육하는 것이 삶의 질을 향상시키는 효과가 있는 것으로 보인다. 앞으로 성인을 대상으로 하는 감각처리중재 프로그램의 다양한 적용과 삶의 질 향상을 도모해야 할 것이다.

This research investigated the sensory processing ability and selected subjects who had sensory processing problems, and divided the subjects into an experimental group and control group. The experimental group was educated with sensory processing intervention on the activities of daily living to determine its influence on the quality of life. The study was based on 230 university students with similar majors in 3 universities of Chungcheong area in the beginning of May, 2013. From here, 32 subjects who had issues with their sensory processing ability were selected. The 230 students were given a survey on the quality of life, individual characteristics, and sensory processing ability. Later, the 32 subjects who had problems with their sensory processing ability were divided into an experimental group and control group. The control group performed sensory processing intervention, whereas the control group did not. After the sensory processing intervention method for 6 weeks, the quality of life was re-evaluated. As a result, the total score of the quality of life after intervention was 98.69 in the experimental group and 84.81 in the control group (p=0.001). The physical score was 16.43 in the experimental group and 14.64 in the control group (p=0.008). The psychological score was 14.71 in the experimental group and 11.75 in the control group (p<0.001). The social score was 14.67 in the experimental group and 13.17 in the control group (p=0.032). The environment score was 14.66 in the experimental group and 12.34 in the control group (p=0.006). The experimental group showed a significant increase in all areas of the quality of life, whereas the control group did not. Through this result, it can be seen that a sensory processing intervention method in daily life can increase the quality of life for subjects with problems in sensory processing ability. Overall, it will be necessary to apply a treatment of various sensory intervention programs for adults and promote a better quality of life.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ellen Yack, Shirley Sutton, Paula Aquilla. Building bridges through sensory integration. pp.10-11, Yeoung Mun Publishing Company, 2005.
  2. Ayres AJ. Sensory integration and the child. pp.13-33, Western Psychological Services, 1979.
  3. H. R. Kwon. Effects of Child-centered Sensory Integration Therapy on Motor Development and Sensory Processing Ability of Children with Pervasive Developmental Disorder, The Graduate School of Public Science & Welfare Management, Pochon CHA University, 2004.
  4. Kim, Mi-Sun, Kim, Tea-Ryon, Comparison of the Sensory Processing Skills of Typically Developing Children With Developmental Disability, The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, Vol.9, No.1, pp.1-10, 2001.
  5. Bundy AC, Lane SJ, Murray EA. Sensory Integration: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. pp.211-222, FA Davis Company, 2002.
  6. Case-Smith J, Bryan T. The effects of occupational therapy with sensory integration emphasis on preschool age children with autism. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol.53, No.5, pp.489-497, 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.53.5.489
  7. Lee JH, Nam TG. The relation between sensory processing ability and interpersonal problem of some university students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.14, No.6, pp.2780-2787, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.6.2780
  8. Nili BA, Moshe A, Batya EY. Sensory processing difficulties and interpersonal relationships in adults. The Journal of Psychology, Vol.3, No.1, pp.70-77, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.31012
  9. Shin, Ji-Youn, Shin, Hea-Jeong, Cho, Hyun-Hee, Cha, Su-Min, Kim, Kyeong-Mi, The Correlation Between Sensory Processing Skills and Behavior Characteristics for Preschoolers. The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, Vol.3 No.1, pp.23-35, 2005.
  10. Brown CE, Dunn W. Adolescent/Adult Sensory profile. pp.1-121. A Harcourt Assessment Co., 2002.
  11. Dunn W. The sensations of everyday life: empirical, theorical and pragmatic considerations. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol.55, No.6, pp.608-620, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.55.6.608
  12. Yack E, Aquilla P, Sutton S. Building Bridges Through Sensory Integration, 2nd ed. pp.23-29, Sensory Resources, 2002.
  13. J. D. Choi, J. K Kim, T. Y. Lee. Relationship between sensory processing styles and personality. The Journal of Korean society of Occupational Therapy, Vol.18, No.1, pp.23-30, 2010.
  14. Hofmann SG, Bitrain. Sensory-processing sensitivity in social anxiety disorder: Relationship to harm avoidance diagnostic subtypes. The Journal of Anxiety Disorder, Vol.21, No.7, pp.944-954, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.12.003
  15. Jerome, EM, Liss M. Relationships between sensory processing style, adult attachment and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol.38, No.6, pp.1341-1352, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.08.016
  16. Liss M, Timmel L, Baley K, Killingsworth P. Sensory processing sensitivity and its relation to parental bonding, anxiety, and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol.19, No.6, pp.641-658, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.007
  17. Nam TG, Lee JH. Differences of Sensory Processing Abilities of Adults by Gender, The Korean Academy of Physical Therapy Science, Vol.17, pp.11-21, 2010.
  18. Moya K, Kristie K, Sinclair S. Relationships between sensory modulation and social supports and health-related quality of life. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol.65, No.3, pp.320-327, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.001370
  19. Batya EY, Tamar S. The relationship between sensory processing patterns and sleep quality in health adults. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol.79, No.3, pp.134-141, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2182/cjot.2012.79.3.2
  20. Bundy AC, Lane SJ, Murray EA. Sensory Integration: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. pp.211-225, Philadelphia, FA Davis Company, 2002.
  21. Shin HS, A Study on Experience of Quality of Life Change of a Vulnerable Class According to Social Welfare Policies in Gyeonggi-do : Focusing on Users of Moohan Care Center & Temporary Homeless Shelter & 365 Elderly Care Center, The graduate school of Kangnam University, 2013.
  22. Kim JY, Health-related quality of life according to breakfast in elderly, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.16, No.7, pp.4668-4678, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.7.4668
  23. Shin SO, Ryu SY, A Study on Factors in Quality of Life of Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction One Year after Diagnosis, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.15, No.1, pp.274-282, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.1.274
  24. Frisch, MB. Quality of life therapy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2006.
  25. Park CH, Kim KH, Back JE, Kim JY, O KH, Min YJ, Im GY, Cheon SG, Hong EK. The Correlation of Sensory Processing Type, Self-Esteem and Academic Ability in the College Students, The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, Vol.10, No.2, pp.33-39, 2012.
  26. Kim SY, Kim EK, Park JS, Jun SH, Chang MY. Comparison With Stress, Depression and Self-Esteem Depending on Adolescent's Sensory Processing Characteristics, The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, Vol.11, No.1 pp.39-49, 2013.
  27. Taek-Young Lee, Correlations between Quality of Life and Sensory Processing Abilities in Older Adults, The Korea Contents Society, Vol.12 No.5, pp.272-279, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.05.272
  28. SK Min, KI Kim, IH Park. Korean Version of World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale, pp.3-70, Hana Publishing Company, 2002.
  29. Kim J-K, Choi J-D, Lee T-Y. The Study of Adult Sensory Processing. The Journal of Korean academy of sensory integration. Vol.15. No.3. pp.117-125, 2007.
  30. Cohn E, Miller LJ, Tickle-Degnen L. Parental hopes for therapy outcomes: Children with sensory modulation disorders. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol.54, No.1, pp.36-43, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.54.1.36
  31. Kim HD, Ko HE, Jang YS, Cho NJ, Bae JY, Correlations between Sensory Processing Abilities and Safe Driving Behavior in Older Adults, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.15, No.5, pp.2743-2748, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.5.2743
  32. Jung WY, Kang DH, Park SY, Correlations between Sensory Processing Patterns and Pain Catastrophizing Levels in Well Older Adults, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.14, No.1, pp.214-222, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.1.214