Food Industry And Nutrition (식품산업과 영양)

The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition (한국식품영양과학회)
권호 표지

Precautions for Sensory Evaluation

관능평가에 대한 제언

  • Kwak, Han Sub (Research Group of Cognition and Sensory Perception, Korea Food Research Institute)
  • 곽한섭 (한국식품연구원 감각인지연구단)
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Hottenstein AW, Taylor R, Carr BT. 2008. Preference segments: A deeper understanding of consumer acceptance or a serving order effect?. Food Qual Prefer 19: 711-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.04.004
  2. King SC, Meiselman HL, Hottenstein AW, Work TM, Cronk V. 2007. The effects of contextual variables on food acceptability: A confirmatory study. Food Qual Prefer 18: 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.014
  3. Hough G, Sanchez R. 1998. Descriptive analysis and external preference mapping of powdered chocolate milk. Food Qual Prefer 9: 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(97)00064-5
  4. Prindiville EA, Marshall RT, Heymann H. 1999. Effect of milk fat on the sensory properties of chocolate ice cream. J Dairy Sci 82: 1425-1432. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75369-5
  5. Im P, Han JH, Kim YC, Lee B, Kim MY, Chang Y, Yu S, Lee Y. 2015. Effect of guar gum on quality of soft tofu stew sauce. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 44: 442-448. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2015.44.3.442
  6. Yang I, Im P, Kang J, Kwak H, Jeong Y, Kim M, Lee Y. 2015. Quality of commercial broiler breast meat retailed in Korea. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 44: 1693-1699. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2015.44.11.1693
  7. Stone H, Sidel JL. 2004. Sensory Evaluation Practices. 3rd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.
  8. O'Mahony M. 1986. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Statistical Methods and Procedures. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA.
  9. Peryam DR, Pilgrim FJ. 1957. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technol 11: 9-14.
  10. Nicolas L, Marquilly C, O'Mahony M. 2010. The 9-point hedonic scale: Are words and numbers compatible?. Food Qual Prefer 21: 1008-1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.05.017
  11. Yeh LL, Kim KO, Chompreeda P, Rimkeeree H, Yau NJN, Lundahl DS. 1998. Comparison in use of the 9-point hedonic scale between Americans, Chinese, Koreans, and Thai. Food Qual Prefer 9: 413-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00028-7
  12. Kappes SM, Schmidt SJ, Lee SY. 2006. Descriptive analysis of cola and lemon/lime carbonated beverages. J Food Sci 71: S583-S589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00162.x
  13. N'Kouka KD, Klein BP, Lee SY. 2004. Developing a lexicon for descriptive analysis of soymilks. J Food Sci 69: 259-263.
  14. Kwak HS, Oh YJ, Kang HB, Kim TH. 2013. Descriptive profile and liking/disliking factors for aseptic-packaged rice porridge. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 42: 1878-1885. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2013.42.11.1878
  15. Lee SM, Bae SJ, Kim KO. 2015. Sensory characteristics and cross-cultural acceptability of sweet crispy chicken (Dakgangjeong) prepared using sauces with different ethnic Korean style flavors among Korean and Chinese consumers. Korean J Food Sci Technol 47: 623-632. https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2015.47.5.623
  16. Meilgaard MC, Civille GV, Carr BT. 2006. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. 4th ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  17. Ares G, Jaeger SR. 2013. Check-all-that-apply questions: Influence of attribute order on sensory product characterization. Food Qual Prefer 28: 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.08.016
  18. Dooley L, Lee YS, Meullenet JF. 2010. The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping. Food Qual Prefer 21: 394-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.10.002