DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preference Analysis of Forest Therapy Program according to the Stress Level

스트레스 수준에 따른 산림치유 프로그램 선호도 분석

  • Kim, Youn-Hee (Forest Therapy, Graduate School, Chungbuk National Univ.)
  • 김윤희 (충북대학교 대학원 산림치유학과)
  • Received : 2016.04.16
  • Accepted : 2016.06.16
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

This study examined differences in the preference of the fest therapy program regarding stress level. Using convenience sampling method, the surveys on the preferred type of forest healing program and social and psychological stress scales was carried out for adult male and female. As a basis of Psycho social Stress Scale (PWI-SF: Psychosocial Well-being Index Short Form), the adult 620 people were classified such as healthy group, potential stress group, high-risk stress group. The data were analyzed by use of SPSS 21.0 program. To see the difference in preferences for forest therapy program between the three groups according to stress levels, it was analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Depending on the stress levels, there were differences in the preferences of forest healing program such as breathing, breathing exercises, walking in the forest, listening to the sound of water flowing, viewing the forest, counseling, consultation and expert coaching, stress-related lectures, communication-related lectures, forest bathing wind bathing sun bathing. High-risk stress group preferred cognitive based program such as counseling, consultation and expert coaching, stress-related lectures, communication-related lectures. Healthy group appeared to prefer highly emotional approach of the program to take advantage of the five senses such as breathing, breathing exercises, walking in the forest, listening to the sound of water flowing, viewing the forest, forest bathing, wind bathing, sun bathing. Noticeable preference difference was not observed in the potential stress group. It is hoped this study will serve as a basis for the development of forest healing program regarding stress level.

스트레스 수준에 따라 산림치유 프로그램의 선호도에 차이가 있는지를 살펴 보았다. 편의표본추출(convenience sampling)방법을 이용하여 성인 남 여를 대상으로 산림치유 프로그램 선호도와 사회 심리적 스트레스 척도에 관한 설문을 실시하였다. 사회 심리적 스트레스 척도(PWI-SF: Psycho social Well-being Index Short Form)를 근거로 성인 620명을 건강군, 잠재적 스트레스군, 고위험군으로 분류하였다. 자료분석은 SPSS 21.0 프로그램을 사용하였다. 스트레스 수준에 따른 세 군 사이의 산림치유 프로그램 선호도 차이를 알아보기 위해 일원 분산분석(one-way ANOVA)을 이용하였다. 스트레스 수준에 따라 산림치유 프로그램 선호도(호흡법 호흡체조, 자유롭게 숲속걷기, 물 흐르는 소리 듣기, 카운슬링 상담 등 전문가 코칭, 스트레스 관련 강의, 대인관계 커뮤니케이션 강의, 경관보기, 숲 해설 듣기, 삼림욕 풍욕 일광욕)에 있어서 차이가 있었다. 고위험 스트레스군은 카운슬링 상담 등 전문가 코칭, 스트레스 관련 강의, 대인관계 커뮤니케이션 강의 등의 인지적인 접근의 프로그램을, 건강군은 호흡법 호흡체조, 자유롭게 숲속걷기(신발착용), 물 흐르는 소리 듣기, 경관보기, 삼림욕 풍욕 일광욕 등의 오감을 활용하는 감성적인 접근의 프로그램을 각각 상대적으로 높게 선호하는 것으로 나타났다. 잠재적 스트레스군에 있어서는 두드러진 선호도가 발견되지 않았다. 본 연구 결과가 스트레스 정도에 따른 산림치유 프로그램을 개발을 위한 기초자료로 활용되기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adevi, A. A., and P. Grahn(2011) Attachment to certain natural environments: A basis for choice of recreational settings, activities and restoration from stress?. Environment and Natural Resources Research 1(1): 36. https://doi.org/10.6008/ESS2237-9290.2011.002.0005
  2. Alvarsson, J. J., S. Wiens and M. E. Nilsson(2010) Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7(3): 1036-1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7031036
  3. An, H. Y. and G. H. Lee(2013) Towards a working model for an MBSR-informed forest healing program: focusing on patients with hypertension. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 17(4): 1-11. (in Korean with English abstract)
  4. An, K. W., L. H. Yoo and J. H. Lee(2010) Forest recreation. In: Invitation to a Forest, The Korean Forestry Society, Seoul, pp. 1-37. (in Korean)
  5. Chang, C. Y. and P. K. Chen(2005) Human response to window views and indoor plants in the workplace. HortScience 40(5): 1354-1359. (in Korean with English abstract)
  6. Chavez-Korell, S., and L. Torres(2014) Perceived stress and depressive symptoms among latino adults the moderating role of ethnic identity cluster patterns. The Counseling Psychologist 42(2): 230-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000013477905
  7. Fowkes, T., and M. Wardman(1988) The design of stated preference travel choice experiments: with special reference to interpersonal taste variations. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 22(1): 27-44.
  8. Frumkin, H.(2001) Beyond toxicity: human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventive. Medicine 20(3): 234-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00317-2
  9. Glise, K., E. Hadzibajramovic, I. H. Jonsdottir and J. G. Ahlborg(2010) Self-reported exhaustion: a possible indicator of reduced work ability and increased risk of sickness absence among human service workers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 83(5): 511-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0490-x
  10. Grahn, P., and U. K. Stigsdotter(2010) The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning 94(3): 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.012
  11. Gullone, E.(2000) The biophilia hypothesis and life in the 21st century: Increasing mental health or increasing pathology?. Journal of Happiness Studies 1(3): 293-322. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010043827986
  12. Gyeonggi Research Institute(2012) Survey on Awareness and Stress of Metropolitan Residents. Gyeonggi Research Institute, Korea. 26pp. (in Korean)
  13. Hartig, T., M. Mang and G. W. Evans(1991) Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior 23(1): 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591231001
  14. Hong, S. J.(2012) Study on the Importance Recognition of Forest Healing Facilities, Programs and Selection Factors. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Univ. of Kyung Hee, Seoul, 82pp. (in Korean with English abstract)
  15. Jang, S. J.(2000) Research on Data Collection of Health Statistics and the Standardization of the Measurement. Gyechuk Munwhasa, Seoul, 37pp. (in Korean)
  16. Kaplan, S.(1995) The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15(3): 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
  17. Kim, K. W.(2009) A theoretical study on planning and design of forest therapeutic trails. J. Kor. Soc. People Plants Environ 12(4): 57-66. (in Korean English abstract)
  18. Kim, K. W. and K. S. Jeon(2012) Forest Care. Kookmin University Press, Seoul, pp.277. (in Korean)
  19. Kim, K. W., Y. H. Lee, H. Y. Kim., C. Y. Kim., J. W. Kim and L. H. Yoo(2008) Management of forest healing program in Saneum Forest. The Conference of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation, Seoul, pp. 41-44. (in Korean with English abstract)
  20. Kim, Y. H.(2015) The Analysis of Needs for the Development of Forest Therapy Program. Ph. D. Dissertation, National Univ. of Chungbuk, Cheongju, 315pp. (in Korean English abstract)
  21. Kim, Y. H., D. J. Kim, P. S. Yeoun and B. J. Choi(2014) The analysis of interests and needs for the development of forest therapy program in adults. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 18(3): 45-59. (in Korean with English abstract)
  22. Lee, B. G. and H. H. Lee(2013) Effects of occupational and social stresses after forest therapy. Journal of Naturopathy 2(2): 108-114. (in Korean with English abstract)
  23. Lee, E, J.(2013) The Influence of Forest Experience on User's Resilience Levels. Unpublished Master's Thesis, National Univ. of Chungbuk, Cheongju, 57pp. (in Korean English abstract)
  24. Lee, E. D., L. H. Yoo, C. W. Park and J. J. Kim(2011) Analysis on the activity contents of forest healing programs in korea. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 15(2): 101-109. (in Korean with English abstract)
  25. Lee, I. S., H. S. Choi, K. S. Bang, G. U. Lee and J. E. Kim(2014) An exploratory study of diffusion of health promotion programs using forests. Perspectives in Nursing Science 11(1): 30-38. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.16952/pns.2014.11.1.30
  26. Lee, M. H. and B. O. Jeong(2012) Social Welfare Program Development, Evaluation Theory and Practice. House of Sharing, Seoul. pp. 428. (in Korean)
  27. Lee, S. H.(2007). The effects of the index of greenness simulation based on restorative environment model upon emotion improvement. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology 12(2): 439-465. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2007.12.2.009
  28. Lee. K, M., K. W. Kim and Y. C. Jeong(2011) Study on monitoring of forest healing program on schizophrenia. The Conference of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation. pp. 7-15. (in Korean, with English abstract)
  29. Lim, H. J., Y. H. Choi, B. Y. Kim, S. H. Kim and B. J. Park(2012) The stress reduction effects of healing forest on university students. The Conference of Journal of Korean Forest Society. pp. 649-652. (in Korean, with English abstract)
  30. Lottrup, L., P. Grahn and U. K. Stigsdotter(2013) Workplace greenery and perceived level of stress: Benefits of access to a green outdoor environment at the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning 110: 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.002
  31. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(2013) City resident population. http://www.molit.go.kr (in Korean)
  32. Mitchell, R., and F. Popham(2008) Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. The Lancet, 372(9650): 1655-1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X
  33. Park, B. J. (2010) Experimental approach of therapeutic effect of forest recreation activities: focused on viewing and walking in forest environments, Ph. D. Dissertation, National Univ. of Chungnam, Daejeon, 91pp. (in Korean with English abstract)
  34. Park, S. M., J. M. Woo., W. Kim., and Y. J. Lee(2012) Sub-populations and disorders that can be applied to forest therapy. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 16(1): 35-42. (in Korean with English abstract)
  35. Shin, W. S.(2005) Forest Healing. Seoul: Jisongsa (in Korean)
  36. Seok, H. D. and S. J. An(2013) Policy of Forest Environmental Service for Happiness. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Korea, 23pp. (in Korean)
  37. Simaika, J. P., and M. J. Samways(2010) Biophilia as a universal ethic for conserving biodiversity. Conservation Biology 24(3): 903-906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01485.x
  38. Statistics Korea(2015). Adult population in South Korea. http://kostat.go.kr/ (in Korean)
  39. Tsunetsugu, Y., B. J. Park, H. Ishii, H. Hirano, T. Kagawa and Y. Miyazaki(2007) Physiological effects of shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere of the forest) in an old-growth broadleaf forest in Yamagata Prefecture, Japan. Journal of Physiological Anthropology 26(2): 135-142. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.26.135
  40. Ulrich, R. S.(1983) Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment. In Behavior and the Natural Environment. Springer, New York, 346pp.
  41. Ulrich, R. S., R. F. Simons, B. D. Losito, E. Fiorito, M. A. Miles and M. Zelson(1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11(3): 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
  42. Van Den Berg, A. E. and M. H. Custers(2011) Gardening promotes neuroendocrine and affective restoration from stress. Journal of Health Psychology 16(1): 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105310365577
  43. Wilson, E. O.(1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 176pp.
  44. Woo, J. M.(2013) Stress Healing. Oncetitute, Seoul, 120pp. (in Korean)
  45. Woo, J. M.(2014) Stress and health. in: Forest Healing Instructor Class 1 Materials. Korea Forest Service, Daejeon, pp. 8-30. (in Korean)
  46. Woo, J. M., S. M. Park, S. K. Lim and W. Kim(2012) Synergistic effect of forest environment and therapeutic program for the treatment of depression. Journal of Korean Forest Society 101(4): 677-685. (in Korean with English abstract)