DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

R&D Spillovers with Endogenous Absorptive Capacity: Lessons for Developing Countries

  • Bae, Chankwon (Korea Institute for International Economic Policy)
  • Received : 2016.05.11
  • Accepted : 2016.06.24
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

This paper analyzes the role of absorptive capacity in R&D spillovers through strategic R&D investments in a game-theoretic framework. In the model, a firm's effective R&D is composed of idiosyncratic R&D, which produces its own innovations, and identical R&D, which improves absorptive capacity. The model shows that in the presence of absorptive capacity firms have a tendency to underinvest (overinvest) in idiosyncratic (identical) R&D relative to the social optimum. As the spillover becomes larger, firms decrease their own R&D while they become more inclined towards strategic exploitation of rivals' efforts. Since the former effect overpowers the latter, the total amount of R&D decreases as the spillover increases. This is socially undesirable, providing a potential justification for a governmental subsidy for idiosyncratic R&D and a tax on identical R&D. The findings may have important implications for newly industrialized or emerging countries that consider a redirection of national R&D policy and intellectual property rights (IPR) regime.

Keywords

References

  1. Amir, R. 2000. "Modelling Imperfectly Appropriable R&D via Spillovers," International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1013-1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00071-0
  2. Amir, R., Evstigneev, I. and J. Wooders. 2003. "Noncooperative versus Cooperative R&D with Endogenous Spillovers Rates," Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 183-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(02)00541-9
  3. Arrow, K. J. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  4. Brander, J. A. and B. J. Spencer. 1985. "Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry," Journal of International Economics, vol. 18, issue 1-2, pp. 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(85)90006-6
  5. Cassimann, B., Perez-Castrillo D. and R. Veugelers. 2002. "Endogenizing Know-How Flows through the Nature of R&D Investments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 775-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(01)00084-4
  6. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal. 1989. "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D," Economic Journal, vol. 99, no. 397, pp. 569-596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763
  7. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  8. d'Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin. 1988. "Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers," American Economic Review, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 1133-1137.
  9. De Bondt, R. 1996. "Spillovers and Innovative Activities," International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 15, no.1, pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(96)01023-5
  10. Grunfeld, L. 2003. "Meet Me Halfway but Don't Rush: Absorptive Capacity and Strategic R&D Investment Revisited," International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1091-1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00076-6
  11. Hamberg, D. 1963. "Invention in the Industrial Research Laboratory," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 95-115. https://doi.org/10.1086/258747
  12. Hammerschmidt, A. 2009. "No Pain, No Gain: An R&D Model with Endogenous Absorptive Capacity," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 418-437. https://doi.org/10.1628/093245609789472023
  13. Henriques I. 1990. Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers: Comment. American Economic Review, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 638-640.
  14. Kaiser, U. 2002a. "R&D with Spillovers and Endogenous Absorptive Capacity," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 286-303. https://doi.org/10.1628/0932456022975448
  15. Kaiser, U. 2002b. "An Empirical Test of Models Explaining Research Expenditures and Research Cooperation: Evidence for the German Service Sector," International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 747-774. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(01)00074-1
  16. Kamien, M. I. and I. Zang. 2000. "Meet Me Halfway: Research Joint Ventures and Absorptive Capacity," International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 995-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00054-0
  17. Kang, M. 2006. "Trade Policy Mix: IPR Protection and R&D Subsidies," Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 744-757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2006.00367.x
  18. Leahy, D. and P. Neary. 1999. "R&D Spillovers and the Case for Industrial Policy in an Open Economy," Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 40-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/51.1.40
  19. Liao, P.-C. 2007. "International R&D Rivalry with Spillovers and Policy Cooperation in R&D Subsidies and Taxes," International Economic Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 399-417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168730701520545
  20. Mansfield, E. 1985. "How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?," Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 217-223. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098683
  21. Martin, S. 2002. Advanced Industrial Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
  22. Muller, W. F. 1962. The Origins of the Basic Inventions Underlying DuPont's Major Product and Process Innovations, 1920 to 1950. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  23. Nelson, R. 1959. "The Simple Economics of Basic Research," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 297-306. https://doi.org/10.1086/258177
  24. Poyago-Theotoky, J. 1999. "A Note on Endogenous Spillovers in a Non-Tournament R&D Duopoly," Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007732218120
  25. Qui, L. D. and Z. Tao. 1998. "Policy on International R&D Cooperation: Subsidy or Tax?," European Economic Review, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1727-1750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00097-4
  26. Spencer, B. J. and J. A. Brander. 1983. "International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy," Review of Economic Studies, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 707-722. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297771
  27. Suzumura, K. 1992. "Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Oligopoly with Spillovers," American Economic Review, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 1307-1320.
  28. Wiethaus, L. 2005. "Absorptive Capacity and Connectedness: Why Competing Firms Also Adopt Identical R&D Approaches," International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 23, no. 5-6, pp. 467-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.03.002