East Asian Economic Review

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (대외경제정책연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Index of Asia-Pacific Regional Integration Effort

  • Received : 2016.03.01
  • Accepted : 2016.04.29
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Asia-Pacific region is not typically seen as one geographic or socio-economic space. Yet, 58 regional economies occupying the space of 28 million square kilometers from Turkey in the West, Russian Federation in the North, French Polynesia in the East and New Zealand in the South belong to the Economic and Social Commission of Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). This commission provides a forum for member states that "promotes regional cooperation and collective action, assisting countries in building and sustaining shared economic growth and social equity". In 2013, ESCAP's members adopted the Bangkok Declaration to enhance efforts towards deeper regional economic integration. Yet this document neither proposes a concrete modality or modalities of achieving deeper integration, nor provides a sense of distance of individual countries to a "perceived" integrated Asia-Pacific.This paper aims to comprehensively quantify recent integration efforts of economies in the Asia-Pacific region. We provide an "index of integration effort" based on twelve metrics that measure the relative distance of a given economy to the region as an economic entity. Generally, we find that while the region has trended towards becoming integrated in general, both the level of integration and integration effort are inconsistent among Asia-Pacific economies. We discuss potential applications and extensions of the index in developing our perspective of the region's economic and social dynamics.

Keywords

References

  1. Adey, P., Budd, L. and P. Hubbard. 2007. "Flying Lessons: Exploring the Social and Cultural Geographies of Global Air Travel," Progress in Human Geography, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 773-791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507083508
  2. Bergerhoff, J., Borghans, L., Seegers, P. K. and T. van Veen. 2013. International Education and Economic Growth. Institute for the Study of Labor Discussion Papers, no. 7354.
  3. Blomstrom, M. and A. Kokko. 1997. Regional Integration and Foreign Direct Investment. NBER Working Paper, no. 6019.
  4. Cain, G. G. 1986. The Economic Analysis of Labor Market Discrimination: A Survey. In Ashenfelter, O. and R. Layard (Eds.). Handbook of Labor Economics. vol. I: Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
  5. Casella, A. 1996. "Large Countries, Small Countries, and the Enlargement of Trade Blocs," European Economic Review, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 389-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00124-7
  6. Crowley, P. M. 2006. "Is There a Lagical Integration Sequence After EMU?," Journal of Economic Integration, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2006.21.1.1
  7. Deonanan, R. 2011. Business Cycle Symmetry in the Caribbean-Is CSME a Feasible Optimum Currency Area? Notre Dame, Ind., University of Notre Dame.
  8. Donchenko, V. 2015. University International Cooperation as a Means For Regional Integration and Development. EURINT Proceedings 2015, Regional Development and Integration. Ias: Centre for European Studies, Aleyandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi.
  9. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). 2012. Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2012: Trends and Developments. Bangkok: United Nations ESCAP.
  10. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). 2014. Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2014: Recent Trends and Developments. Bangkok: United Nations ESCAP.
  11. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). 2015. Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2015: Supporting Participation in Value Chains. Bangkok: United Nations ESCAP.
  12. Fiess, N. 2007. "Business Cycle Synchronization and Regional Integration: A Case Study for Central America," World Bank Economic Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhl014
  13. Frankel, J. A. and A. K. Rose. 1998. "Is EMU more Justifiable Ex Post than Ex Ante?," European Economic Review, vol. 41, no. 3-5, pp. 753-760. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00034-2
  14. Gossling, S. and J. H. Nilsson. 2010. "Frequent Flyer Programmes and the Reproduction of Aeromobility," Environ Plan A, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4282
  15. Guttman, L. 1954. "Some Necessary Conditions for Common Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289162
  16. Hallward-Driemeier, M. 2003. Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Attract Foreign Direct Investment? Only a Bit… and They Could Bite. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, no. WPS 3121.
  17. Hodrick, R. and E. C. Prescott. 1997. "Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2953682
  18. Kaiser, H. F. 1961. "A Note on Guttman's Lower Bound for the Number of Common Factors," British Journal of Psychology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-2.
  19. Konig, J. 2015. The EU Index of Integration Effort. UNU-CRIS Working Papers, W-2015/4.
  20. Kose, M. A. and R. Riezman. 2000. Small Countries and Preferential Trade Agreements: How Severe is the Innocent Bystander Problem? CESifo Working Paper no. 253.
  21. Kuroda, K., Yuki, T. and K. Kang. 2010. Cross-Border Higher Education for Regional Integration: Analysis of the JICA-RI Survey on Leading Universities in East Asia, Analysis of Cross-Border Higher Education for Regional Integration and Labor Markets in East Asia JICA Research Institute Working Paper, no. 26.
  22. Le, T. 2012. "R&D Spillovers through Student Flows, Institutions, and Economic Growth: What Can We Learn from African Countries?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.2011.00571.x
  23. Martin, O. 2013. The African Union's Mechanisms to Foster Gender Mainstreaming and Ensure Women's Political Participation and Representation. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA)
  24. McKinnon, R. and G. Schnabl. 2014. China's Exchange Rate and Financial Repression: The Conflicted Emergence of the Renminbi as an International Currency. CESifo Working Paper, no. 4649.
  25. Milne, S. and I. Ateljevic. 2010. "Tourism, Economic Development and the Global-Local Nexus: Theory Embracing Complexity," Tourism Geographies, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 369-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/146166800110070478
  26. Molle, W. 2006. The Economics of European Integration: Theory, Practice, Policy. Aldershot: Ashgate
  27. Motta, M. and G. Norman. 1996. "Does Economic Integration Cause Foreign Direct Investment?," International Economic Review, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 757-783. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527310
  28. Orefice, G. 2012. International Migration and Trade Agreements: The New Role of PTAs. CEPII Working Papers, no. 2012-15.
  29. Pan, W. 2001. "Akaike's Information Criterion in Generalized Estimating Equations," Biometrics, vol, 57. no. 1, pp. 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00120.x
  30. Pearson, K. 1901. "LIII. On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Points in Space" Philosophical Magazine Series 6, vol, 2. no. 11, pp. 559-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440109462720
  31. Petri, P. A. 2008. Multitrack Integration in East Asian Trade: Noodle Bowl or Matrix? Asia Pacific and Issues, Series, no. 86, Hawaii: East-West Center.
  32. Shin, K. and Y. Wang. 2004. "Trade Integration and Business Cycle Co-movements: The Case of Korea with Other Asian Countries," Japan and the World Economy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 213-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0922-1425(03)00028-8
  33. te Velde, D. W. and D. Bezemer. 2006. "Regional Integration and Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries," Transnational Corporations, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 41-70.
  34. Tobin, J. and S. Rose-Ackerman. 2005. Foreign Direct Investment and the Business Environment in Developing Countries: The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties. Yale Law and Economics Research Paper, no. 293.
  35. van der Vleuten, A. 2013. Gender Mainstreaming in EU-SADC Relations: The Capabilities-Expectations Gap. In Boening, A., Kremer, J.-F. and A. van Loon (eds.). Global Power Europe. vol. 2. Berlin: Springer. pp. 305-319.
  36. Wahab, S. and C. Cooper. 2001. Tourism, Globalisation and the Competitive Advantage of Nations. In Wahab. S. and C. Cooper (Eds.). Tourism in the Age of Globalisation. New York: Routledge.
  37. WEF. 2015. Global Gender Gap Report 2015. World Economic Forum.