The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers (전기학회논문지)

The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers (대한전기학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Demand Response of Large-Scale General and Industrial Customer using In-House Pricing Model

사내요금제를 활용한 대규모 수용가 수요반응에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Min-Jeong (Dept. of Consumer Economics, Sookmyung Women's University)
  • Received : 2016.04.21
  • Accepted : 2016.06.03
  • Published : 2016.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Demand response provides customer load reductions based on high market prices or system reliability conditions. One type of demand response, price-based program, induces customers to respond to changes in product rates. However, there are large-scale general and industrial customers that have difficulty changing their energy consumption patterns, even with rate changes, due to their electricity demands being commercial and industrial. This study proposes an in-house pricing model for large-scale general and industrial customers, particularly those with multiple business facilities, for self-regulating demand-side management and cost reduction. The in-house pricing model charges higher rates to customers with lower load factors by employing peak to off-peak ratios in order to reduce maximum demand at each facility. The proposed scheme has been applied to real world and its benefits are demonstrated through an example.

Keywords

References

  1. US Department of Energy, "Benefits of Demand Response in Electricity Markets and Recommendations for Achieving them," http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/oeprod/DocumentsandMedia/DOE_Benefits_of_Demand_Response_in_Electricity_Markets_and_Recommendations_for_Achieving_Them_Report_to_Congress.pdf, 2006.
  2. M. H. Albadi, and E. F. El-Saadany, "A Summary of Demand Response in Electricity Markets," Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 78, Issue 11, pp. 1989-1996, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2008.04.002
  3. M. H. Albadi, and E. F. El-Saadany, "Demand Response in Electricity Markets: an overview," IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Montreal, pp. 1-5, 24-28 June 2007.
  4. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, "Effective Operation on Improved Way for Demand Side Management Program," Technical report, January 2009.
  5. Korea Electric Power Corporation, "KEPCO in Brief," General report, 2014.
  6. Yonhapnews, "Government to raise power rate by 5.4%...2.7% for household use, 6.4% for industrial use," http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/economy/2013/11/19/0302000000AKR20131119107551003.HTML, 19 November 2013.
  7. G. L. Barbose, C. A. Goldman, R. Bharvirkar, N. C. Hopper, M. K. Ting, and B. Neenan, "Real Time Pricing as a Default of Optional Service for Commercial and Industrial Customers: A Comparative Analysis of Eight Case Studies," Public Interest Energy Research, 2006.
  8. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, "A Study on the Application Plan for Korea through the Case Study of Optional Tariff System by Demand Management in the Foreign Countries," Technical report, November 2009.
  9. RLW Analytics, Inc., "Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Mandatory Hourly Pricing Program Process Evaluation," Technical report, 2007.
  10. A. Faruqui, and S. Sergici, "Household Response to Dynamic Pricing of Electricity: A Survey of 15 Experiments," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Vol. 38, Issue 2, pp. 193-225, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-010-9127-y
  11. A. Faruqui, R. Hledik, and J. Tsoukalis, "The Power of Dynamic Pricing," The Electricity Journal, Vol. 22, Issue 3, pp. 42-56, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2009.02.011
  12. G. R. Newsham, and B. G. Bowker, "The Effect of Utility Time-varying Pricing and Load Control Strategies on Residential Summer Peak Electricity Use : A Review," Energy Policy, Vol. 38, Issue 7, pp. 3289-3296, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.027
  13. J. Stromback, C. Dromacque, and M. H. Yassin, "The potential of smart meter enabled programs to increase energy and systems efficiency: a mass pilot comparison," VaasaETT, 2011.
  14. Charles River Associates, "Primer on Demand-Side Management with an Emphasis on Price-Response Programs," February 2005.
  15. G. Abrate, "Time-of-Use Pricing and Electricity Demand Response: Evidence from a Sample of Italian Industrial Customers," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 21-40, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAMS.2008.020037
  16. R. Boisvert, P. Cappers, B. Neenan, and B. Scott, "Industrial and Commercial Customer Response to Real Time Electricity Prices," Neenan Associates, 10 December 2004.
  17. P. M. Schwarz, T. N. Taylor, M. Birmingham, and S. L. Dardan, "Industrial response to electricity real time prices: short run and long run," Economic Inquiry. Vol. 40, Issue 4, pp. 597-610, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/40.4.597
  18. C. A. Goldman, N. C. Hopper, R. Bharvirkar, B. Neenan, R. Boisvert, P. Cappers, D. Pratt, and K. Butkins, "Customer Strategies for Responding to Day-Ahead Market Hourly Electricity Pricing," Demand Response Research Center, August 2005.
  19. Korea Electric Power Corporation, i-SMART, http://pccs.kepco.co.kr/
  20. Energy Sentry, Load Factor Calculations, http://energysentry.com/newsletters/load-factor-calculations.php
  21. Korea Electric Power Corporation, RatesTable, http://cyber.kepco.co.kr/ckepco/front/jsp/CY/E/E/CYEEH P00101.jsp
  22. Edaily, KT, Reduction of 200000kW Electricity Consumption. http://www.edaily.co.kr/news/NewsRead.edy?SCD=JE31&newsid=01584246602909288&DCD=A00503&OutLnkChk=Y, 20 August 2013.
  23. JoongAng Ilbo, KT, Reduction of 200000kW Electricity Consumption using Smart Demand Response… Electricity Volume of One City. http://article.joins.com/news/article/article.asp?total_id=12385879, 20 August 2013.