Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (대한간호학회지)

Korean Society of Nursing Science (한국간호과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validity and Reliability of the Peer Group Caring Interaction Scale-Korean Version

한국어판 간호대학생의 동료돌봄행위척도(Peer Group Caring Interaction Scale)의 타당도 및 신뢰도 분석

  • Received : 2015.10.26
  • Accepted : 2016.03.30
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This paper was conducted to validate the Korean version of the Peer Group Caring Interaction Scale (PGCIS-K) that measures caring behaviors as experienced by nursing students. Methods: Translation of the PGCIS-K was validated through forward-backward translation methods. Survey data were collected from 218 nursing students in a nursing school. Construct validity and criterion-related validity were evaluated. Internal consistency and the Guttman split-half coefficient were calculated to assess reliability. Results: The PGIS-K showed reliability except for 4 items (Cronbach's ${\alpha}=.91$, Guttman split-half coefficient=.85), which were low (<.30) or negatively correlated with the total scale. A 12-item reduced form of the PGCIS-K was developed by item-analysis and construct validity evidence. Factor loading for the 12 items on 2 factors ranged from .47~.82, which explained 58.4% of the total variance. Two factors were named 'modeling and assistance (Cronbach's ${\alpha}=.87$)' and 'communication and sharing (Cronbach's ${\alpha}=.82$)'. Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion validity were supported according to the correlation coefficients of the 2 factors with other measure. Conclusion: The findings suggest preliminary evidence that the 12-item PGCIS-K can be used to measure nursing students' peer group caring interactions in Korea. Additional studies are recommended to continue the psychometric evaluation of this scale. Also, it can be extended to measure graduate nursing students or staff nurses' peer group caring interaction.

Keywords

References

  1. Coates C. The evolution of measuring caring: Moving toward construct validity. In: Watson J, editor. Assessing and measuring caring in nursing and health science. New York, NY: Springer Publishing; 2002. p. 215-241.
  2. Watson J. Overview. In: Watson J, editor. Assessing and measuring caring in nursing and health sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing; 2009. p. 3-23.
  3. Turkel MC, Ray MA. Creating a caring practice environment through self-renewal. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 2004;28(4):249-254. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006216-200410000-00004
  4. Boykin A, Schoenhofer SO. Nursing as caring: A model for transforming practice [Internet]. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2013 [cited 2015 October 18]. Available from: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/42988/42988-pdf.pdf?session_id=bf87cac6a873e095e0f5c9100586355feca0bb1a.
  5. Boykin A, Schoenhofer SO. The role of nursing leadership in creating caring environments in health care delivery systems. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 2001;25(3):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006216-200104000-00003
  6. Beck CT. Quantitative measurement of caring. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999;30(1):24-32. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01045.x
  7. Coates C. The evolution of measuring caring: Moving toward construct validity. In: Watson J, editor. Assessing and measuring caring in nursing and health science. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing; 2009. p. 261-265.
  8. Hughes L. Peer group interactions and the student-perceived climate for caring. The Journal of Nursing Education. 1993;32(2):78-83.
  9. Longo J. Acts of caring: Nurses caring for nurses. Holistic Nursing Practice. 2011;25(1):8-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0b013e3181fe2627
  10. Noddings N. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1984.
  11. Hughes LC. Development of an instrument to measure caring peer group interactions. The Journal of Nursing Education. 1998;37(5):202-207.
  12. Hughes LC, Kosowski MM, Grams K, Wilson C. Caring interactions among nursing students: A descriptive comparison of 2 associate degree nursing programs. Nursing Outlook. 1998;46(4):176-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-6554(98)90070-7
  13. Hughes LC, Romick P, Sandor MK, Phillips CA, Glaister J, Levy K, et al. Evaluation of an informal peer group experience on baccalaureate nursing students' emotional well-being and professional socialization. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2003;19(1):38-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jpnu.2003.9
  14. Longo J. The relationships between manager and peer caring to registered nurses' job satisfaction and intent to stay. International Journal of Human Caring. 2009;13(2):26-33.
  15. Pfeiffer JA, Wickline MA, Deetz J, Berry ES. Assessing RN-to-RN peer review on clinical units. Journal of Nursing Management. 2012;20(3):390-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01321.x
  16. Hughes LC. Peer group caring interaction scale and organizational climate for caring questionnaire. In: Watson J, editor. Assessing and measuring caring in nursing and health science. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing; 2009. p. 149-161.
  17. Hughes LC. (School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, RN). The organizational climate for caring questionnaire: psychometric properties. [date unknown]. 2 leaves. Availability located at: Author's individual collection.
  18. Gabbert WL. Beyond online: Enhancing caring and professional practice in nursing education. International Journal for Human Caring. 2008;12(2):68-80.
  19. Cossette S, Pepin J, Cote JK, de Courval FP. The multidimensionality of caring: a confirmatory factor analysis of the caring nurse-patient interaction short scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;61(6):699-710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04566.x
  20. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 19-130.
  21. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. p. 200-485.
  22. Tigges BB. Psychometric properties of the social comparison motives scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2009;17(1):29-44. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.17.1.29
  23. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA.W.N, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2007;60(1):34-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
  24. Kelley T, Ebel R, Lincare JM. Item discrimination indices. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 2002;16(3):883-884.
  25. Ferketich S. Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis. Research in Nursing and Health. 1991;14(2):165-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770140211
  26. Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2007;16(2):234-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x
  27. Hwang KJ. Sung confucian ethics and education of care-based on Noddings' view. In: Hwang KJ, Kim SH, Park WJ, Cho KR, Lee SI, Baek MJ, et al., editors. Korean cultural tradition and ethics of care. Seongnam: The Academy of Korean Studies Press; 2015. p. 19-52.
  28. Cho GH. What is Korean collectivism? In: Kim MC, Ghang TJ, Kim GH, Kim GI, Kim WB, Kim JG, et al., editors. Korean, Who are you?. Paju: Book 21; 2013. p. 153-171.
  29. Lee YJ. Multivariate analysis using SPSS/PC+. Seoul: Sukjungbooks; 1993. p. 39-130.

Cited by

  1. 간호사가 지각하는 간호관리자의 돌봄-배려행위와 동료 간 돌봄-배려행위가 재직의도에 미치는 영향 vol.23, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2017.23.2.191
  2. 성인초기 여성의 한국어판 월경전증후군 대처 측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도 검증 vol.31, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5932/jkphn.2017.31.2.296
  3. 돌봄 측정 관련 국내 간호학 연구 문헌고찰: 양적 연구를 중심으로 vol.29, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2018.29.2.155
  4. Influence of Nurse Manager and Peer Group Caring Behaviors as Perceived by Nurses on Organizational Socialization and Nursing Performance vol.26, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2020.26.2.110
  5. 고학년 간호대학생의 인간중심간호역량 영향요인: King의 역동적 상호작용 체계모형을 중심으로 vol.12, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.15207/jkcs.2021.12.8.357