Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Progressive collapse analysis of steel frame structure based on the energy principle

  • Chen, Chang Hong (School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University) ;
  • Zhu, Yan Fei (School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University) ;
  • Yao, Yao (School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University) ;
  • Huang, Ying (School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology)
  • Received : 2015.12.21
  • Accepted : 2016.05.10
  • Published : 2016.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The progressive collapse potential of steel moment framed structures due to abrupt removal of a column is investigated based on the energy principle. Based on the changes of component's internal energy, this paper analyzes structural member's sensitivity to abrupt removal of a column to determine a sub-structure resisting progressive collapse. An energy-based structural damage index is defined to judge whether progressive collapse occurs in a structure. Then, a simplified beam damage model is proposed to analyze the energies absorbed and dissipated by structural beams at large deflections, and a simplified modified plastic hinges model is developed to consider catenary action in beams. In addition, the correlation between bending moment and axial force in a beam during the whole deformation development process is analyzed and modified, which shows good agreement with the experimental results.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China

References

  1. Agarwal, A. and Varma, A.H. (2014), "Fire induced progressive collapse of steel building structures: The role of interior gravity columns", Eng. Struct., 58, 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.020
  2. American Institute of Steel for Construction (2003), Load Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel for Construction, Chicago, IL, USA.
  3. Bojorquez, E., Reyes-Salazar, A., Reyes-Salazar, A., Teran-Gilmore, A. and Ruiz, S.E. (2010), "Energy-based damage index for steel structures", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 10(4), 343-360.
  4. Ellingwood, B.R. and Dusenberry, D.O. (2005), "Building design for abnormal loads and progressive collapse", Comput.-Aided Civ. Inf., 20(3), 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00387.x
  5. Federal Emergency Management Agency 356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Washington D.C., USA.
  6. FEMA (2000), State of the Art Report on Connection Performance, FEMA 355D, SAC Joint Venture and FEMA, Washington, D.C., USA.
  7. Izzuddin, B.A., Vlassis, A.G., Elghazouli, A.Y. and Nethercot, D.A. (2008), "Progressive collapse of multistorey buildings due to sudden column loss - Part I: Simplified assessment framework", Eng. Struct., 30(5), 1308-1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.011
  8. Khandelwala, K. and El-Tawil, S. (2011), "Pushdown resistance as a measure of robustness in progressive collapse analysis", Eng. Struct., 33(9), 2653-2661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.013
  9. Kim, T., Kim, J. and Park, J. (2009), "Investigation of progressive collapse-resisting capability of steel moment frames using push-down analysis", J. Perform. Constr. Fac., 23(5), 327-335. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2009)23:5(327)
  10. Lew, H.S., Main, J.A., Robert, S.D., Sadek, F. and Chiarito, V.P. (2013), "Performance of steel moment connections under a column removal scenario. I: Experiments", J. Struct. Eng., 139(1), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000618
  11. Liu, M. (2013), "A new dynamic increase factor for nonlinear static alternate path analysis of building frames against progressive collapse", Eng. Struct., 48, 666-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.011
  12. McConnell, J.R., Cotte, T. and Rollins, T. (2015), "Finite element analysis assessing partial catenary action in steel beams", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 109, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.004
  13. Mirtaheri, M. and Abbasi Zoghi, M. (2016), "Design guides to resist progressive collapse for steel structures", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 20(2), 357-378. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.2.357
  14. Porcari, G.L.F., Zalok, E. and Mekky, W. (2015), "Fire induced progressive collapse of steel building structures: A review of the mechanisms", Eng. Struct., 82, 261-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.011
  15. Rezvani, F.H. and Asgarian, B. (2014), "Effect of seismic design level on safety against progressive collapse of concentrically braced frames", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 16(2), 135-156 https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.2.135
  16. Sadek, F., Main, J., Lew, H.S., Robert, S. and Chiarito, V. (2009), "Testing and analysis of steel beamcolumn assemblies under column removal scenarios", J. Struct. Eng., 137(9), 881-892.
  17. Sadek, F., Main, J.A., Lew, H.S. and El-Tawil, S. (2013), "Performance of steel moment connections under a column removal scenario. II: Analysis", J. Struct. Eng., 139(1), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000617
  18. Szyniszewski, S.T. (2009), "Progressive collapse of moment resisting steel framed buildings quantitative analysis based on energy approach", Ph.D. Dissertation; University of Florida, USA.
  19. Unified Facilities Criteria (2009), Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse, (UFC4-023-03), Department of Defense, USA.
  20. US General Services Administration (2003), Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects, GSA.
  21. Vlassis, A.G., Izzuddin, B.A., Elghazouli, A.Y. and Nethercot, D.A. (2008), "Progressive collapse of multistorey buildings due to sudden column loss - Part II: Application", Eng. Struct., 30(5), 1424-1438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.08.011
  22. Wang, K., Li, G. and Yang, T. (2009), "A study of restrained steel beam s with catenary action under distributed load, Part1: theoretical model", China Civil Eng. J., 43(1), 1-7.
  23. Yang, B. and Tan, K.H. (2013a), "Behavior of composite beam-column joints in a middle-column-removal scenario: experimental tests", J. Struct. Eng., 140(2), 04013045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000805
  24. Yang, B. and Tan, K.H. (2013b), "Experimental tests of different types of bolted steel beam-column joints under a central-column-removal scenario", Eng. Struct., 54, 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.037
  25. Yang, B. and Tan, K.H. (2013c), "Robustness of bolted-angle connections against progressive collapse: experimental tests of beam-column joints and development of component-based models", J. Struct. Eng., 139(9), 1498-1514. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000749
  26. Yin, Y.Z. and Yang, Y.C. (2005), "Analysis of catenary action in steel beams using a simplified hand calculation method, Part 1: theory and validation for uniform temperature distribution", J. Constr. Steel Res., 61(2), 83-211.

Cited by

  1. Effects of Postelastic Stiffness Ratio on Dynamic Increase Factor in Progressive Collapse vol.31, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001109
  2. Effects of damping ratio on dynamic increase factor in progressive collapse vol.22, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.3.677
  3. Response of a steel column-footing connection subjected to vehicle impact vol.63, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.63.1.125
  4. Investigation on the seismic performance of T-shaped column joints vol.21, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.21.3.335
  5. Dynamic increase factor for progressive collapse analysis of semi-rigid steel frames vol.28, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.2.209
  6. Evaluation of dynamic increase factor in progressive collapse analysis of steel frame structures considering catenary action vol.30, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.30.3.253
  7. The finite element model of pre-twisted Euler beam based on general displacement solution vol.69, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.69.5.479
  8. Mitigation of progressive collapse in steel structures using a new passive connection vol.70, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.70.4.381
  9. Dynamic increase factor for progressive collapse of semi-rigid steel frames with extended endplate connection vol.31, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.31.6.617
  10. Analysis of Key Elements of Truss Structures Based on the Tangent Stiffness Method vol.12, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12061008
  11. Progressive collapse risk of 2D and 3D steel-frame assemblies having shear connections vol.179, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106533