The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제8권3호
  • /
  • Pages.207-213
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy of a direct drill-guiding system with minimal tolerance of surgical instruments used for implant surgery: a prospective clinical study

  • Lee, Du-Hyeong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, A3DI, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • An, Seo-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hong, Min-Ho (Department of Bio-medical Research Institute, A3DI, Kyungpook National University Hospital) ;
  • Jeon, Kyoung-Bae (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Bok (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, A3DI, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2015.11.17
  • 심사 : 2016.04.26
  • 발행 : 2016.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. A recently introduced direct drill-guiding implant surgery system features minimal tolerance of surgical instruments in the metal sleeve by using shank-modified drills and a sleeve-incorporated stereolithographic guide template. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of this new guided surgery system in partially edentulous patients using geometric analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. For the study, 21 implants were placed in 11 consecutive patients using the direct drill-guiding implant surgery system. The stereolithographic surgical guide was fabricated using cone-beam computed tomography, digital scanning, computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing, and additive manufacturing processes. After surgery, the positional and angular deviations between planned and placed implants were measured at the abutment level using implant-planning software. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the deviations (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. The mean horizontal deviations were 0.593 mm (SD 0.238) mesiodistally and 0.691 mm (SD 0.344) buccolingually. The mean vertical deviation was 0.925 mm (SD 0.376) occlusogingivally. The vertical deviation was significantly larger than the horizontal deviation (P=.018). The mean angular deviation was 2.024 degrees (SD 0.942) mesiodistally and 2.390 degrees (SD 1.142) buccolingually. CONCLUSION. The direct drill-guiding implant surgery system demonstrates high accuracy in placing implants. Use of the drill shank as the guiding component is an effective way for reducing tolerance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Garber DA, Belser UC. Restoration-driven implant placement with restoration-generated site development. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995;16:796, 798-802, 804.
  2. Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Surgical guide for dental implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:248-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80018-9
  3. D'Souza KM, Aras MA. Types of implant surgical guides in dentistry: a review. J Oral Implantol 2012;38:643-52. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00018
  4. Marchack CB. CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery and fabrication of an immediately loaded prosthesis for a partially edentulous patient. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:389-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60028-6
  5. Park C, Raigrodski AJ, Rosen J, Spiekerman C, London RM. Accuracy of implant placement using precision surgical guides with varying occlusogingival heights: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:372-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60080-9
  6. Lee SL, Kim HJ, Son MK, Chung CH. Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using cone-beam CT. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:92-6. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.92
  7. Koop R, Vercruyssen M, Vermeulen K, Quirynen M. Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:630-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02436.x
  8. Aalam AA, Nowzari H, Krivitsky A. Functional restoration of implants on the day of surgical placement in the fully edentulous mandible: a case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:10-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00041.x
  9. Barone A, Rispoli L, Vozza I, Quaranta A, Covani U. Immediate restoration of single implants placed immediately after tooth extraction. J Periodontol 2006;77:1914-20. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060072
  10. Holst S, Blatz MB, Eitner S. Precision for computer-guided implant placement: using 3D planning software and fixed intraoral reference points. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:393-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.050
  11. Youk SY, Lee JH, Park JM, Heo SJ, Roh HK, Park EJ, Shin IH. A survey of the satisfaction of patients who have undergone implant surgery with and without employing a computer-guided implant surgical template. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:395-405. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.395
  12. Stumpel LJ 3rd. Cast-based guided implant placement: a novel technique. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:61-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60140-7
  13. Noharet R, Pettersson A, Bourgeois D. Accuracy of implant placement in the posterior maxilla as related to 2 types of surgical guides: a pilot study in the human cadaver. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:526-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.013
  14. Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Di Giorgio G, Stefanelli LV, Barbato E. The Influence of the Tolerance between Mechanical Components on the Accuracy of Implants Inserted with a Stereolithographic Surgical Guide: A Retrospective Clinical Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:580-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12120
  15. Van Assche N, Quirynen M. Tolerance within a surgical guide. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:455-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01836.x
  16. Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:305-13.
  17. D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Elaut L, De Bruyn H. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:293-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00255.x
  18. Block MS, Chandler C. Computed tomography-guided surgery: complications associated with scanning, processing, surgery, and prosthetics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:13-22.
  19. Vercruyssen M, Hultin M, Van Assche N, Svensson K, Naert I, Quirynen M. Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy. Periodontol 2000 2014;66:228-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12046
  20. Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Stefanelli LV, Cavallini C. The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:264-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.010
  21. Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Berge SJ, Maal TJ. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:343-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12112
  22. Van de Wiele G, Teughels W, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Temmerman A, Quirynen M. The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1489-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12494
  23. Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:112-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02552.x
  24. Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, Schutyser F, Berge SJ, Maal TJ. A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:1265-72.
  25. Lee JH, Park JM, Kim SM, Kim MJ, Lee JH, Kim MJ. An assessment of template-guided implant surgery in terms of accuracy and related factors. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:440-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.4.440
  26. Koyanagi K. Development and clinical application of a surgical guide for optimal implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:548-52. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129377
  27. De Kok IJ, Thalji G, Bryington M, Cooper LF. Radiographic stents: integrating treatment planning and implant placement. Dent Clin North Am 2014;58:181-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2013.09.008
  28. Greenstein G, Greenstein B, Desai RN. Using drill stops on twist drills to promote safety and efficiency when creating osteotomies for dental implants. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:371-5. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2014.10
  29. Schwarz L, Pommer B, Bijak M, Watzek G, Unger E. Auto-stop drilling device for implant site preparation: in vitro test of eccentric sensor position. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:1041-6. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3953
  30. Juodzbalys G, Wang HL, Sabalys G, Sidlauskas A, Galindo-Moreno P. Inferior alveolar nerve injury associated with implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:183-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02314.x
  31. Nelogi S, Rao BS, Naveen HC, Porwal A, Nelogi M. A surgical guide for optimal placement and immediate restoration of implant. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:623-6. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00005

피인용 문헌

  1. Accuracy Evaluation of a Stereolithographic Surgical Template for Dental Implant Insertion Using 3D Superimposition Protocol vol.2017, pp.1687-8736, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4292081
  2. Unilateral Spinous Process Noncovering Hook Type Patient-specific Drill Template for Thoracic Pedicle Screw Fixation vol.42, pp.18, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002067
  3. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis vol.29, pp.09057161, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13346
  4. Flapless dental implant surgery and use of cone beam computer tomography guided surgery vol.224, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.268
  5. CAD/CAM implant surgical guides: maximum errors in implant positioning attributable to the properties of the metal sleeve/osteotomy drill combination vol.4, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0146-2
  6. 임플란트 수술용 가이드를 사용한 부분 유도 임플란트 수술의 정확도 평가: 증례보고 vol.57, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.2.150
  7. Time efficiency and operator convenience of using a micro-screw in image registration for guided implant surgery vol.57, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.3.219
  8. Impact of Matching Point Selections on Image Registration Accuracy between Optical Scan and Computed Tomography vol.2020, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3285431
  9. Accuracy of the Point-Based Image Registration Method in Integrating Radiographic and Optical Scan Images: A Pilot Study vol.13, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5856/jkds.2020.13.1.28
  10. Does a fully digital workflow improve the accuracy of computer‐assisted implant surgery in partially edentulous patients? A systematic review of clinical trials vol.22, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12937
  11. Accuracy, Labor-Time and Patient-Reported Outcomes with Partially versus Fully Digital Workflow for Flapless Guided Dental Implants Insertion-A Randomized Clinical Trial with One-Year Follow-Up vol.10, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051102
  12. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implants placed with fully guided versus partially guided tissue-supported surgical guides: A split-mouth clinical study vol.126, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.05.009
  13. 술자의 영상정합의 경험이 컴퓨터 단층촬영과 광학스캔 영상 간의 정합 정확성과 작업시간에 미치는 영향 vol.59, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.3.299
  14. Comparison of the accuracy of implant placement using different drilling systems for static COMPUTER‐ASSISTED implant surgery: A simulation‐based experimental study vol.23, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13032