Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning (농촌계획)

Korean Society of Rural Planning (한국농촌계획학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Walking as Research Method for Revealing Subjective Perceptions on Landscape : Rural Village Sucheong-ri, Gwangju

걷기를 적용한 경관의 주관적 인식조사 방법의 유용성에 관한 연구 - 광주 수청리 농촌마을 대상으로 -

  • Lee, Cha-Hee (Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yun, Seung-Yong (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Son, Yong-Hoon (Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 이차희 (서울대학교 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 윤승용 (서울대학교 환경대학원) ;
  • 손용훈 (서울대학교 환경대학원)
  • Received : 2016.04.05
  • Accepted : 2016.05.18
  • Published : 2016.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In existing method, research for landscape resource is driven by professional (or with the participation of local people at Tokenism level), and usually hinder local residents from reflecting their appreciations on the landscape resources in their own ways and eventually ends up with indistinguishable landscape planning. To avoid this, a profound understanding of what landscape they experience in their daily life and how they perceive it should be empirically analysed carefully. The purpose of this study is to apply walking behavior as a method to examine local residents' subjective perceptions and consider its usability. The researcher walked the site(Sucheongri) with the residents, carrying a GPS device, taking photographs of the landscape objects they described, and recording the relevant explanations. After gathering photographs and explanations which represent the research participants' individual subjective perception, the researcher analysed the explanation using open coding, based on grounded theory. By the analysis, 117 landscape objectives are identified and 18 reason factors for landscape perception were deduced from the explanation. Those factors could be classified as 'positive feeling inducing' and 'negative feeling inducing', and also as 'personal emotion based' and 'community based emotion'. By comparison between feeling map by conventional method and feeing map by new method, usability of new method was empirically reveled. Walking behavior makes it easier for researcher to get more abundant data in quantitative aspect and profound understanding with affection of respondent by allowing them to 'go beyond' the perceptions they remember. Finally new method with walking gives professionals a contextual understanding of a place and more resident-oriented plans and management on sites.

Keywords

References

  1. Bunkse, E. V., 1981, Humboldt and an aesthetic tradition in geography, Geographical Review , p127-146. https://doi.org/10.2307/214183
  2. Certeau, M., 1988, The Practice of Everyday Life, University of California Press(Berkeley).
  3. Corbin, J. M., and Strauss, A. L., 1990, Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Conons, and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), p3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
  4. Cosgrove, D. E., 1984, Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape, Univ of Wisconsin Press.
  5. Cullen, G., 1961, The Concise Townscape, The Architectural Press.
  6. Downs, R. M., and Stea, D., 1973, Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior, Transaction Publishers.
  7. Gatta, Federica and Maria Anita Palumbo, 2014, Walking through Urban Transformation: Fieldwork in the Northeast of Paris, in Timothy Shortell and Evrick Brown (eds.), Walking in the European City: Quotidian Mobility and Urban Ethnography, Surrey: Ashgate, p245-262.
  8. Gibson, J. J., 2014, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. Psychology Press.
  9. Han, G. S., Yoon, Y. H., and Jo, H. K., 2005, An Analysis and Evaluation of Urban Landscapes Using Images Taken with a Fish-eye Lens, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 33(4), p11-21.
  10. Hwang, K. W., and Hwang, Y. H., 2001, A Study on the Green Mapping and Its Application in the Case of Seocho-Gu, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 29(1), p113-123.
  11. Hong, K. S., 2009, The Thick Understanding and Interpretation of the Region through the Vistas of Landscape and Memory, The Association of Korean Cultural and Historical Geographers, 21(1), p46-94.
  12. Jallouli, J. and G. Moreau, 2009, An immersive path-based study of wind turbines' landscape: A French case in Plouguin, Renewable energy, 34(-), p597-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.036
  13. Jeon, J. H., 2004, Place and Landscape of the Local Elite in the Hoseo Region, Journal of cultural and historical geography, Vol.16 No.3, p150-151
  14. Joo, S. H., 2008, A Proposal of Rural Landscape Policy for Preservation, Formation and Management, Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 14(4), p77-86.
  15. Joo, S. H., and Shin, Y. J., 2015, A Study on the Current Status and Future Tasks of the Landscape Resources Survey in Korea, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 43(3), p27-42. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2015.43.3.027
  16. Jung, N. S., and Jung, H. H., 2010, Research on a Modification of Rural Amenity Landscape Survey Table, Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 16(4), p171-178.
  17. Kang, Y. E., Park, M. J., Kim, S. B., and Kim, E. J., 2012, A Study on the Classification of Rural Tourism Resources through a Card Sorting Test-Focused on Rural Amenity Resources Database, Journal of East Asian Landscape Studies, 6(2), p63-71.
  18. Kim, M. Y., and Jun, S. I., 2014, 'Five Senses City' and Walking as an Urban Research Methodology, Journal of Korea Planning Association, 49(2), p5-21.
  19. Le Breton, D., 2000, Eloge da la marche, Metailie.
  20. Lee, I. S., and Shu, J. H., 2003, The Effectiveness of the Hemi-sphere Projection Method in the Analysis of Streetscape, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 31(2), p58-69.
  21. Lee, J. W., Yoon, J. O., and Lim, S. B., 2010, A study on a research method measuring rural Landscape resources by inhabitants participation, Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 16(4), p13-22.
  22. Lee, K. Y., 2010, La construction et des Questions de la loi du paysage a l'oeuil de la convention europeenne du paysage, Chonbuk Law Review, 30(-), p171-188.
  23. Lynch, K., 1960, The image of the city, MIT press.
  24. Morse, J. M., 2003, Using grounded theory in nursing, In Schreiber, R. S. & Stern, P. N.(Eds.). HYUNMOON.
  25. Nassauer, J. I., 1995, Culture and changing landscape structure, Landscape ecology, 10(4), p229-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129257
  26. Nicholas, E. J., 1991, The Betweenness of Place: Towards a Geography of Modernity, Johns Hopkins University Press.
  27. Passini, R., 1984, Spatial representations: a wayfinding perspective, Environmental Psychology, 4(2), p153-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(84)80031-6
  28. Relph, E., 1976, Place and placelessness, Pion London.
  29. Seo, H. L., Choi, Y. M., and Park, S. H., 2011, An Empirical Study of Walking Amounts and Routes in Residential Neighborhoods, Journal of the architectural institute of Korea, 27(9), p271-281.
  30. Song, N. G., Yeo, J. T., and Ko, D. W., 2009, Visitors Circulation in Leisure Spaces using Space Syntax, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 37(1), p1-8.
  31. Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M., 2001, Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory(2nd ed)(Sin, G. N, Trans.). HYUNMOON.
  32. Sung, C. J., 2013, Significance and Social Reconstruction of place Identity through the Vistas of landscape, Journal of Photo Geography, 23(4), p253-269.
  33. Tabayashi, A., 2015, Commodification of rural space in Japan(Jeong, A, Trans.), Hanulmplus.
  34. Tuan, Y. F., 1977, Space and place : The perspective of experience, University of Minnesota Press.
  35. Tuan, Y. F., 1980, Rootedness and sense of place, Landscape, 24(-), p3-8.
  36. Yang, B. I., 2015, The categorization of geographical thinking grounded on human subjectivity, Social Studies Education, 54(1), p31-46.
  37. Yoon, J. O., 2005, A Study on the Preservation and Management of Rural Landscape for Enhancing Amenity, Rural Research Institute.

Cited by

  1. 주민들이 인식하는 산촌의 경관 유형 특성 - IPA 분석을 중심으로 - vol.26, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2020.26.2.001
  2. 도시근교 농촌경관에 대한 거주민별 주관적 인식 비교 - 귀농·귀촌인의 특성을 고려한 경관관리 방안모색 - vol.26, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2020.26.3.013