DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship between Molecular Structure Characteristics of Feed Proteins and Protein In vitro Digestibility and Solubility

  • Bai, Mingmei (Animal Production and Product Quality and Security Key Lab, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University) ;
  • Qin, Guixin (Animal Production and Product Quality and Security Key Lab, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University) ;
  • Sun, Zewei (Animal Production and Product Quality and Security Key Lab, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University) ;
  • Long, Guohui (College of Life Science, Jilin Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2015.08.25
  • Accepted : 2015.11.11
  • Published : 2016.08.01

Abstract

The nutritional value of feed proteins and their utilization by livestock are related not only to the chemical composition but also to the structure of feed proteins, but few studies thus far have investigated the relationship between the structure of feed proteins and their solubility as well as digestibility in monogastric animals. To address this question we analyzed soybean meal, fish meal, corn distiller's dried grains with solubles, corn gluten meal, and feather meal by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to determine the protein molecular spectral band characteristics for amides I and II as well as ${\alpha}$-helices and ${\beta}$-sheets and their ratios. Protein solubility and in vitro digestibility were measured with the Kjeldahl method using 0.2% KOH solution and the pepsin-pancreatin two-step enzymatic method, respectively. We found that all measured spectral band intensities (height and area) of feed proteins were correlated with their the in vitro digestibility and solubility ($p{\leq}0.003$); moreover, the relatively quantitative amounts of ${\alpha}$-helices, random coils, and ${\alpha}$-helix to ${\beta}$-sheet ratio in protein secondary structures were positively correlated with protein in vitro digestibility and solubility ($p{\leq}0.004$). On the other hand, the percentage of ${\beta}$-sheet structures was negatively correlated with protein in vitro digestibility (p<0.001) and solubility (p = 0.002). These results demonstrate that the molecular structure characteristics of feed proteins are closely related to their in vitro digestibility at 28 h and solubility. Furthermore, the ${\alpha}$-helix-to-${\beta}$-sheet ratio can be used to predict the nutritional value of feed proteins.

Keywords

References

  1. Adler-Nissen, J. 1979. Determination of the degree of hydrolysis of food protein hydrolysates by trinitro benzene sulfonic acid. J. Agric. Food Chem. 6:1256-1262.
  2. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
  3. Boisen, S. and J. A. Fernandez. 1995. Prediction of the apparent ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids in feedstuffs and feed mixtures for pigs by in vitro analyses. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 51:29-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00686-4
  4. Chen, L. M., X. W. Zhang, and P. Q. Yu. 2014. Molecular Spectroscopy Basis to Explore Molecular Structure in Relation to Nutritional Values and Metabolic Characteristics in Dairy Cattle of Chinese DDGS from Different Sources. Ph.D. Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin, China.
  5. Dale, N. M., M. Araba, and E. Whittle. 1987. Protein solubility as an indicator of optimum processing of soybean meal. In: Proceedings of 1987 Georgia Nutrition Conference for the Feed Industry, Georgia Nutrition Society, Atlanta, GA, USA. pp. 88-95.
  6. Doiron, K., P. Yu, J. J. McKinnon, and D. A. Christensen. 2009. Heat-induced protein structure and subfractions in relation to protein degradation kinetics and intestinal availability in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 92:3319-3330. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1946
  7. Dyson, H. J. and P. E. Wright. 1993. Peptide conformation and protein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 3:60-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-440X(93)90203-W
  8. Huang, R. L., Z. L. Tan, T. X. Xing, Y. F. Pan, and T. J. Li. 2000. An in vitro method for the estimation of ileal crude protein and amino acids digestibility using the dialysis tubing for pig feedstuffs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 88:79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00209-1
  9. Jiao, P. X., D. S. Liu, S. Zheng, and C. D. Chen. 2012. Study on protein secondary structures on the protein degradability of feeds in rumen of dairy cows. Feed Ind. 33:48-51.
  10. Liu, B., P. Thacker, J. McKinnon, and P. Yu. 2013. In-depth study of the protein molecular structures of different types of dried distillers grains with solubles and their relationship to digestive characteristics. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93:1438-1448. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5912
  11. Long, G. H., J. Yuan, H. Pan, Z. Sun, Y. Li, and G. X. Qin. 2015. Characterization of thermal denaturation structure and morphology of soy glycinin by FTIR and SEM. Int. J. Food Prop. 18:763-774. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2014.908206
  12. Meng-Xia, X. and L. Yuan. 2002. Studies on the hydrogen bonding of aniline's derivatives by FT-IR. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 58:2817-2826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-1425(02)00072-0
  13. Papadopoulos, M. C., A. R. El Boushy, A. E. Roodbeen, and E. H. Ketelaars. 1986. Effects of processing time and moisture content on amino acid composition and nitrogen characteristics of feather meal. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 14:279-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(86)90100-8
  14. Peng, Q. H., N. A. Khan, Z. Wang, and P. Q. Yu. 2014. Relationship of feeds protein structural makeup in common Prairie feeds with protein solubility, in situ ruminal degradation and intestinal digestibility. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 194:58-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.05.004
  15. Qin, G. X., Z. W. Sun, G. H. Long, T. Wang, and M. M. Bai. 2014. The physicochemical property of feedstuff proteins and its effects on the nutritional value. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 26:1-7.
  16. Samadi, K. Theodoridou, and P. Yu. 2013. Detect the sensitivity and response of protein molecular structure of whole canola seed (yellow and brown) to different heat processing methods and relation to protein utilization and availability using ATR-FT/IR molecular spectroscopy with chemometrics. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 105:304-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2012.11.096
  17. Tan-Wilson, A. L., P. M. Hartl, N. E. Delfel, and K. A. Wilson. 1985. Differential expression of Kunitz and Bowman-Birk soybean proteinase inhibitors in plant and callus tissue. Plant Physiol. 78:310-314. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.78.2.310
  18. Theodoridou, K. and P. Yu. 2013. Application potential of ATR-FT/IR molecular spectroscopy in animal nutrition: Reveal protein molecular structures of canola meal and presscake, as affected by heat processing methods, in relationship with their protein digestive behavior and utilization for dairy cattle. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61:5449-5458. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf400301y
  19. Xin, H., X. Zhang, and P. Yu. 2013a. Using synchrotron radiation-based infrared microspectroscopy to reveal microchemical structure characterization: frost damaged wheat vs. normal wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14:16706-16718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140816706
  20. Xin, H., K. C. Falk, and P. Yu. 2013b. Studies on Brassica carinata seed. 1. Protein molecular structure in relation to protein nutritive values and metabolic characteristics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61:10118-10126. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf4020763
  21. Yan, X., N. A. Khan, F. Zhang, L. Yang, and P. Yu. 2014. Microwave irradiation induced changes in protein molecular structures of barley grains: relationship to changes in protein chemical profile, protein subfractions, and digestion in dairy cows. J. Agric. Food Chem. 62:6546-6555. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf501024j
  22. Yu, P., J. J. Mckinnon, C. R. Christensen, and D. A. Christensen. 2004. Using synchrotron-based FTIR micro-spectroscopy to reveal chemical features of feather protein secondary structure: comparison with other feed protein sources. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:7353-7361. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0490955
  23. Yu, P. and W. G. Nuez-Ortin. 2010. Relationship of protein molecular structure to metabolisable proteins in different types of dried distillers grains with solubles: A novel approach. Br. J. Nutr. 104:1429-1437. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510002539
  24. Zhang, X. and P. Yu. 2012. Molecular basis of protein structure in combined feeds (hulless barley with bioethanol coproduct of wheat dried distillers grains with solubles) in relation to protein rumen degradation kinetics and intestinal availability in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3363-3379. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5308

Cited by

  1. Physico-chemical and nutritional properties of meat analogues based on Spirulina/lupin protein mixtures vol.245, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03298-w
  2. Changes in protein structural characteristics upon processing of gluten-free millet pasta vol.327, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127052
  3. Potential utilization of fish waste for the sustainable production of microalgae rich in renewable protein and phycocyanin-Arthrospira platensis/Spirulina vol.294, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126106
  4. Application of advanced molecular spectroscopy and modern evaluation techniques in canola molecular structure and nutrition property research vol.61, pp.19, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1798343
  5. Hairless canary seeds (Phalaris canariensis L.) as a potential source of antioxidant, antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and antiobesity biopeptides vol.3, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43014-020-00050-w
  6. Properties, digestion and peptide release of heat-induced duck egg white vol.154, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112788
  7. Structural characteristics and physicochemical properties of freeze-dried snail meat vol.155, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112980
  8. The effect of fat content in food matrix on the structure, rheological properties and digestive properties of protein vol.126, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107464