DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Magnetic Properties of Electrical Steel for Rotating Machine according to the Specimen

  • Choi, Yun-Yong (Department of Automotive Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Chin, Jun-Woo (Department of Automotive Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Hong, Jung-Pyo (Department of Automotive Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2016.02.22
  • Accepted : 2016.03.31
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

This paper analyzes the magnetic property according to the machined shape of steel material with non-oriented silicon steel (50PN470/50A470), that is most commonly used in the design of electrical equipment. Toward this end, specimens were produced and divided into Bar-Specimen (Epstein Frame Tester) and Ring-Specimen (Toroidal Ring Tester). The characteristics of the electrical Silicon steel were measured using the instruments solely dedicated to measuring each specimen. The core loss of the Bar-Specimen, which is commonly used, was found to be less than that of the Ring-Specimen. This is a very important design factor in achieving the objectives of improving the product efficiency and predicting the performance of electrical equipment. It serves as a critical point of view in order to reduce the error between design value and product value. A comparative analysis was conducted regarding various characteristics (Hysteresis, B-H characteristic, Iron loss, Minor loop, Coercive force, Residual magnetic flux density, etc.) of the electrical silicon steel considered in the design of the electrical equipment according to the specimen.

Keywords

References

  1. International Energy Agency, World energy outlook, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France (2013) pp. 623-625.
  2. B. Mecrow and A. Jack, Energy Policy (2008) pp. 4336-4341.
  3. Y. Kai, S. Zeze, T. Todaka, and M. Enokizono, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 5 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.2226070
  4. Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Li, D. Xie, and B. Bai, IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2013.2295861
  5. A. Krings, M. Cossale, A. Boglietti, A. Cavagnino, and J. Soulard, IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Pittsburgh, USA (2014).
  6. A. Krings, S. Nategh, A. Stening, H. Grop, O. Wallmark, and J. Soulard, International Conference Magnetism and Metallurgy (WMM), Gent, Belgium (2012).
  7. A. Krings, Iron Losses in Electrical Machines, Doctoral Thesis, Stockholm, Sweden (2014).
  8. Hwi Jun Kim, J. Kor. Magn. Soc. 21, 2 (2011).
  9. IEC Standard Publication 60404-2 (2008).
  10. J. Sievert, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 215 (2000).
  11. M. Enokizono, Y. Takeshima, and H. Matsuo, J. Magn. Soc. Jpn. 24, 4 (2000).
  12. Seung-Hee Chai, Ji-Hyun Kim, Sung-Il Kim, and J. P. Hong, J. Kor. Magn. Soc. 20, 3 (2015).
  13. B. Z. Chen, S. Yan, Y. Z. Ju, X. C. Zhang, M. Yue, J. Xia, and G. P. Zhao, J. Kor. Magn. Soc. 20, 1 (2015).
  14. Hyun-Seok Whang, Sang-Jun Yun, Joon Moon, and Sug-Bong Choe, J. Kor. Magn. Soc. 20, 1 (2015).
  15. Gordon R. Slemon, Electrical machine and drives. Addison-Wesley publishing company Inc. (1992) pp. 2-31.
  16. K. Atllah and D. Howe, IEEE Trans. Magn. 29, 6 (1993).
  17. Shiuk Chung, Daehyun Koo, Choongkyu Han, and Jiyoung Lee, J. Kor. Magn. Soc. 19, 2 (2014).
  18. Seul-Ki Nam, Sun-Gyu Moon, Keun Yong Sohn, and Won-Wook Park, J. Kor. Magn. Soc. 19, 4 (2014).
  19. Sung-Ho Lee, Yong-Jae Kim, Kyu-Seok Lee, and Sung-Jin Kim, J. Kor. Magn. Soc. 20, 4 (2015).
  20. S. Y. Park, K. S. Ryu, J. K. Yi, and J. S. Park, J. Kor. Magn. Soc. 16, 4 (2006).
  21. M. S. Lim, J. H. Kim, and J. P. Hong, IEEE Trans. Magn. 51, 11 (2015).
  22. Y. Kai, Y. Tsuchida, T. Todaka, and M. Enokizono, IEEE Trans. Magn. 48, 4 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.2227637