DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Strength-Maturity Models Accounting for Hydration Heat in Massive Walls

  • Yang, Keun-Hyeok (Department of Plant Architectural Engineering, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Mun, Jae-Sung (Department of Architectural Engineering, Graduate School, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Kim, Do-Gyeum (Structural Engineering & Bridges Research Division, Korea Institute of Construction Technology) ;
  • Cho, Myung-Sug (KHNP-Central Research Institute, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., LTD.)
  • Received : 2015.05.06
  • Accepted : 2016.01.31
  • Published : 2016.03.30

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the capability of different strength-maturity models to account for the effect of the hydration heat on the in-place strength development of high-strength concrete specifically developed for nuclear facility structures under various ambient curing temperatures. To simulate the primary containment-vessel of a nuclear reactor, three 1200-mm-thick wall specimens were prepared and stored under isothermal conditions of approximately $5^{\circ}C$ (cold temperature), $20^{\circ}C$ (reference temperature), and $35^{\circ}C$ (hot temperature). The in situ compressive strengths of the mock-up walls were measured using cores drilled from the walls and compared with strengths estimated from various strength-maturity models considering the internal temperature rise owing to the hydration heat. The test results showed the initial apparent activation energies at the hardening phase were approximately 2 times higher than the apparent activation energies until the final setting. The differences between core strengths and field-cured cylinder strengths became more notable at early ages and with the decrease in the ambient curing temperature. The strength-maturity model proposed by Yang provides better reliability in estimating in situ strength of concrete than that of Kim et al. and Pinto and Schindler.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)

References

  1. ACI Committee 214. (2010). Guide for obtaining cores and interpreting compressive strength results (ACI 214.4R-10). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA.
  2. ACI Committee 306. (2010). Guide to cold weather concreting (ACI 306R-10). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA.
  3. ASTM C42/C42 M, C150, C403/C403 M, C989, C1074. (2011). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, V. 4.02, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. 2011.
  4. Bamforth, P. B. (1980). In situ measurement of the effect of partial Portland cement replacement using either fly ash or ground granulated blast furnace slag on the performance of mass concrete. Proceeding Institution of Civil Engineers, 69(2), 777-800. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1980.2377
  5. Bogue, R. H. (1955). Chemistry of portland cement. New York, NY: Reinhold Publisher.
  6. Byfors, J. (1980). Plain concrete at early ages. CBI Research Report No. 3:80, Cement and Concrete Research.
  7. Carino, N. J., & Tank, R. C. (1992). Maturity function for concretes made with various cements and admixtures. ACI Materials Journal, 89(2), 188-196.
  8. Harris, D. W., Mohorovic, C. E., & Dolen, T. P. (2000). Dynamic properties of mass concrete obtained from dam cores. ACI Materials Journal, 97(3), 290-296.
  9. Haug, A. K., & Jakobsen, B. (1990). In situ and design strength for concrete in offshore platforms. ACI SP 121-19 High-Strength Concrete. Second International Symposium, 369-397.
  10. Hulshizer, A. J. (2001). The benefits of the maturity method for cold-weather concreting. Concrete International, 23(3), 68-72.
  11. Kim, J. K., Han, S. J., & Park, S. K. (2002a). Effect of temperature and aging on the mechanical properties of concrete. Part II. Prediction model. Cement and Concrete Research, 32(7), 1095-1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00745-7
  12. Kim, J. K., Han, S. H., & Song, Y. C. (2002b). Effect of temperature and aging on the mechanical properties of concrete Part I. Experimental results. Cement and Concrete Research, 32(7), 1087-1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00744-5
  13. Lee, D. H., Kim, S. Y., Jeon, M. H., Kim, Y. H., & Lee, K. H. (2013). Development of technology for the field application of blast-furnace slag powder concrete. Daejeon, Korea: Land & Housing Institute.
  14. Neville, A. M. (1995). Properties of concrete. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
  15. Nili, M., & Salehi, A. M. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of pozzolans in massive high-strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 24(11), 2108-2116.
  16. Parsons, T. J., & Naik, T. R. (1985). Early age concrete strength determination by maturity. Concrete International, 7(2), 37-43.
  17. Pinto, R. C. A., & Schindler, A. K. (2010). Unified modeling of setting and strength development. Cement and Concrete Research, 40(1), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.010
  18. Pucinotti, R. (2013). Assessment of in situ characteristic concrete strength. Construction and Building Materials, 44, 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.041
  19. Schrader, E. (2007). Statistical acceptance criteria for strength of mass concrete. Concrete International, 29(6), 57-61.
  20. Sofi, M., Mendis, P. A., & Baweja, D. (2012). Estimating earlyage in situ strength development of concrete slabs. Construction and Building Materials, 29, 659-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.019
  21. Uva, G., Porco, F., Fiore, A., & Mezzina, M. (2013). Proposal of a methodology for assessing the reliability of in situ concrete tests and improving the estimate of the compressive strength. Construction and Building Materials, 38, 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.025
  22. Vazquez-Herrero, C., Martinez-Lage, I., & Sanchez-Tembleque, F. (2012). A new procedure to ensure structural safety based on the maturity method and limit state theory. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 393-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.040
  23. Yang, K. H. (2014). High-strength concrete application technology for nuclear facilities. Technical Report(1st), Department of Plant.Architectural Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon, Korea.
  24. Zakoutsky, J., Tydlitat, V., & Cerny, R. (2012). Effect of temperature on the early-stage hydration characteristics of Portland cement: A large-volume calorimetric study. Cement and Concrete Research, 36, 969-976.

Cited by

  1. Modeling of Compressive Strength Development of High-Early-Strength-Concrete at Different Curing Temperatures vol.10, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-016-0147-6
  2. Optimization of Curing Regimes for Precast Prestressed Members with Early-Strength Concrete vol.10, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-016-0154-7
  3. 양생온도에 따른 90 MPa 수준의 고강도 철근 콘크리트 보의 휨거동 vol.21, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2017.21.5.134
  4. Time and Crack Effect on Chloride Diffusion for Concrete with Fly Ash vol.12, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0230-2
  5. Numerical identification of the thermal properties of early age concrete using inverse heat transfer problem vol.55, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-018-2504-2
  6. Simulation and Modelling in Cracks Prevention of Early Age Concrete vol.562, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/562/1/012014
  7. Numerical Search of the Optimum Curing Regimes for High-Early-Strength Concrete vol.32, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003144