생체재료학회지 (Biomaterials Research)

  • 제20권2호
  • /
  • Pages.88-95
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1226-4601(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2055-7124(eISSN)
한국생체재료학회 (Korean Society for Biomaterials)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

3-dimensional bioprinting for tissue engineering applications

  • Gu, Bon Kang (Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences) ;
  • Choi, Dong Jin (Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences) ;
  • Park, Sang Jun (Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kim, Min Sup (Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kang, Chang Mo (Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kim, Chun-Ho (Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences)
  • 투고 : 2015.12.04
  • 심사 : 2016.04.12
  • 발행 : 2016.06.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The 3-dimensional (3D) printing technologies, referred to as additive manufacturing (AM) or rapid prototyping (RP), have acquired reputation over the past few years for art, architectural modeling, lightweight machines, and tissue engineering applications. Among these applications, tissue engineering field using 3D printing has attracted the attention from many researchers. 3D bioprinting has an advantage in the manufacture of a scaffold for tissue engineering applications, because of rapid-fabrication, high-precision, and customized-production, etc. In this review, we will introduce the principles and the current state of the 3D bioprinting methods. Focusing on some of studies that are being current application for biomedical and tissue engineering fields using printed 3D scaffolds.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제번호 : Development of functionalized hydrogel scaffold based on medical grade biomaterials with 30 % or less of molecular weight reduction

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE)

참고문헌

  1. Hull CW. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. US patent: 4,575,330. 1986.
  2. Kruth JP, Leu MC, Nakagawa T. Progress in additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping. CIRP Ann-Manuf Techn. 1998;47:525-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63240-5
  3. Melchels FPW, Domingos MAN, Kleina TJ, Maldaa J, Bartoloc PJ, Hutmacher DW. Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37:1079-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007
  4. Bak D. Rapid prototyping or rapid production? 3D printing processes move industry towards the latter. Assembly Autom. 2003;23:340-5. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445150310501190
  5. Campbell TA, Ivanova OS. 3D printing of multifunctional nanocomposites. Nano Today. 2013;8:119-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2012.12.002
  6. Kulkarni P, Marsan A, Dutta D. A review of process planning techniques in layered manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping J. 2000;6:18-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540010309859
  7. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Zechmann CM, Unterhinninghofen R, Kauczor HU, Giesel FL. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010;5:335-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0476-x
  8. Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G. Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2.
  9. Wong KV, Hernandez A. A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mech Eng. 2012;2012:208760.
  10. Roberson DA, Espalin D, Wicker RB. 3D printer selection: a decision-making evaluation and ranking model. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2013;8:201-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2013.830939
  11. Quan Z, Wu A, Keefe M, Qin X, Yu J, Suhr J, Byun JH, Kim BS, Chou TW. Additive manufacturing of multidirectional preforms for composites: opportunities and challenges. Mater Today. 2015;18:503-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.05.001
  12. Dean D, Wallace J, Siblani A, Wang MO, Kim K, Mikos AG, Fisher JP. Continuous digital light processing (cDLP): highly accurate additive manufacturing of tissue engineered bone scaffolds. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2012;7:13-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2012.673152
  13. Baumers M, Tuck C, Dickens P, Hague R. How can material jetting systems be upgraded for more efficient multi-material additive manufacturing? Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication (SFF) Symposium. Texas: The University of Texas at Austin; 2014.
  14. Gaytan SM, Cadena MA, Karim H, Delfin D, Lin Y, Espalin D, Macdonald E, Wicker RB. Fabrication of barium titanate by binder jetting additive manufacturing technology. Ceram Int. 2015;41:6610-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.108
  15. Xu X, Meteyer S, Perry N, Zhao YF. Energy consumption model of Binderjetting additive manufacturing processes. Int J Prod Res. 2014; doi:10.1080/ 00207543.2014.937013.
  16. Turner BN, Strong R, Gold SA. A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyping J. 2014;21:250-61.
  17. Domingos M, Chiellini F, Gloria A, Ambrosio L, Bartolo P, Chiellini E. Effect of process parameters on the morphological and mechanical properties of 3D bioextruded poly($\varepsilon$-caprolactone) scaffolds. Rapid Prototyping J. 2012;18:56-67. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541211193502
  18. Land WS, Zhang B, Ziegert J, Davies A. In-situ metrology system for laser powder bed fusion additive process. Procedia Manuf. 2015;1:393-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.047
  19. Su X, Yang Y, Xiao D, Chen Y. Processability investigatation of non-assembly mechanisms for powder bed fusion process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013; 64:1193-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4079-2
  20. Ahn D, Kweon JH, Chio J, Lee S. Quantification of surface roughness of parts processed by laminated object manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol. 2012;212:339-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.08.013
  21. Park J, Tari MJ, Hahn T. Characterization of the laminated object manufacturing (LOM) process. Rapid Prototyping J. 2000;6:36-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540010309868
  22. Zhang K, Liu W, Shang X. Research on the processing experiments of laser metal deposition shaping. Opt Laser Technol. 2007;39:549-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2005.10.009
  23. Lewis GK, Schlienger E. Practical considerations and capabilities for laser assisted direct metal deposition. Mater Design. 2000;21:417-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(99)00078-3
  24. Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: review. Int J Polym Sci. 2011;2011:290602.
  25. Atala A. Tissue engineering of reproductive tissues and organs. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:21-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.038
  26. Forbes SJ, Rosenthal N. Preparing the ground for tissue regeneration: from mechanism to therapy. Nat Med. 2014;20:857-69. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3653
  27. Tian H, Tang Z, Zhuang X, Chen X, Jing X. Biodegradable synthetic polymers: preparation, functionalization and biomedical application. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37:237-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.004
  28. O'Brien FJ. Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Materials Today. 2011;14:88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X
  29. Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Materials Today. 2013;16:496-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017
  30. Gauvin R, Chen YC, Lee JW, Soman P, Zorlutuna P, Nichol JW, Bae H, Chen S, Khademhosseini A. Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography. Biomaterials. 2012;33:3824-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.048
  31. Martin JR, Gupta MK, Page JM, Yu F, Davidson JM, Guelcher SA, Duvall CL. A porous tissue engineering scaffold selectively degraded by cell-generated reactive oxygen species. Biomaterials. 2014;35:3766-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.026
  32. Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30:546-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005
  33. Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, Vlierberghe SV, Dubruel P. A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2012;33:6020-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050
  34. Maciulaitis J, Deveikyte M, Rekstyte S, Bratchikov M, Darinskas A, Simbelyte A, Daunoras G, Laurinaviciene A, Laurinavicius A, Gudas R, Malinauskas M, Maciulaitis R. Preclinical study of SZ2080 material 3D microstructured scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering made by femtosecond direct laser writing lithography. Biofabrication. 2015;7:015015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/1/015015
  35. Lee JW, Ahn GS, Kim DS, Cho DW. Development of nano- and microscale composite 3D scaffolds using PPF/DEF-HA and micro-stereolithography. Microelectron Eng. 2009;86:1465-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2008.12.038
  36. Patricio T, Domingos M, Gloria A, D'Amora U, Coelho JF, Bartolo PJ. Fabrication and characterisation of PCL and PCL/PLA scaffolds for tissue engineering. Rapid Prototyping J. 2014;20:145-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2012-0037
  37. Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Tan KC, Teoh SH. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1169-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00232-0
  38. Velu R, Singamneni S. Selective laser sintering of polymer biocomposites based on polymethyl methacrylate. J Mater Res. 2014;29:1883-92. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2014.211
  39. Mazzoli A, Ferretti C, Gigante A, Salvolini E, Mattioli-Belmonte M. Selective laser sintering manufacturing of polycaprolactone bone scaffolds for applications in bone tissue engineering. Rapid Prototyping J. 2015;21:386-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2013-0040
  40. Hsieh FY, Lin HH, Hsu SH. 3D bioprinting of neural stem cell-laden thermoresponsive biodegradable polyurethane hydrogel and potential in central nervous system repair. Biomaterials. 2015;71:48-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.028
  41. Ahn SH, Lee HJ, Lee JS, Yoon H, Chun W, Kim GH. A novel cell-printing method and its application to hepatogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cell-embedded mesh structures. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13427. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13427
  42. Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:773-85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
  43. Wu GH, Hsu SH. Review: polymeric-based 3D printing for tissue engineering. J Med Biol Eng. 2015;35:285-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-015-0038-3
  44. Neiman JAS, Raman R, Chan V, Rhoads MG, Raredon MSB, Velazquez JJ, Dyer RL, Bashir R, Hammond PT, Griffith LG. Photopatterning of hydrogel scaffolds coupled to filter materials using stereolithography for perfused 3D culture of hepatocytes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112:777-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25494
  45. Elomaa L, Pan CC, Shanjani Y, Malkovskiy A, Seppala JV, Yang Y. Three-dimensional fabrication of cell-laden biodegradable poly(ethylene glycol-co-depsipeptide) hydrogels by visible light stereolithography. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:8348-58. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB01468A
  46. Elomaa L, Teixeira S, Hakala S, Korhonen H, Grijpma DW, Seppala JV. Preparation of poly(e-caprolactone)-based tissue engineering scaffolds by stereolithography. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:3850-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.039
  47. Chan V, Zorlutuna P, Jeong JH, Kong H, Bashir R. Three-dimensional photopatterning of hydrogels using stereolithography for long-term cell encapsulation. Lab Chip. 2010;10:2062-70. https://doi.org/10.1039/c004285d
  48. Seck TM, Melchels FPW, Feijen J, Grijpma DW. Designed biodegradable hydrogel structures prepared by stereolithography using poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(D, L-lactide)-based resins. J Control Release. 2010;148:34-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.111
  49. Pati F, Song TH, Rijal G, Jang J, Kim SW, Cho DW. Ornamenting 3D printed scaffolds with cell-laid extracellular matrix for bone tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2015;37:230-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.012
  50. Lee KH, Jin GH, Jang CH, Jung WK, Kim GH. Preparation and characterization of multi-layered poly($\varepsilon$-caprolactone)/chitosan scaffolds fabricated with a combination of melt-plotting/in situ plasma treatment and a coating method for hard tissue regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1:5831-41.
  51. Hong JM, Kim BJ, Shim JH, Kang KS, Kim KJ, Rhie JW, Cha HJ, Cho DW. Enhancement of bone regeneration through facile surface functionalization of solid freeform fabrication-based three-dimensional scaffolds using mussel adhesive proteins. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:2578-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.041
  52. Berry E, Brown JM, Connell M, Craven CM, Efford ND, Radjenovic A, Smith MA. Preliminary experience with medical applications of rapid prototyping by selective laser sintering. Med Eng Phys. 1997;19:90-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(96)00039-2
  53. Rimell JT, Marquis PM. Selective laser sintering of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for clinical applications. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:414-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:4<414::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-M
  54. Shishkovsky IV, Tarasova EY, Zhuravel LV, Petrov AL. The synthesis of a biocomposite based on nickel titanium and hydroxyapatite under selective laser sintering conditions. Tech Phys Lett. 2001;27:211-3. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1359830
  55. Tan KH, Chua CK, Leong KF, Cheah CM, Cheang P, Abu Bakar MS, Cha SW. Scaffold development using selective laser sintering of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite biocomposite blends. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3115-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00131-5
  56. Wiria FE, Leong KF, Chua CK, Liu Y. Poly-$\varepsilon$-caprolactone/hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering scaffold fabrication via selective laser sintering. Acta Biomater. 2007;3:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2006.07.008
  57. Zhang H, Lin CY, Hollister SJ. The interaction between bone marrow stromal cells and RGD-modified three-dimensional porous polycaprolactone scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4063-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.015
  58. Kanczler JM, Mirmalek-Sani SH, Hanley NA, Ivanov AL, Barry JJA, Upton C, Shakesheff KM, Howdle SM, Antonov EN, Bagratashvili VN, Popov VK, Oreffo ROC. Biocompatibility and osteogenic potential of human fetal femurderived cells on surface selective laser sintered scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:2063-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.010
  59. Du Y, Liu H, Shuang J, Wang J, Ma J, Zhang S. Microsphere-based selective laser sintering for building macroporous bone scaffolds with controlled microstructure and excellent biocompatibility. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015;135:81-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.06.074
  60. Williams JM, Adewunmi A, Schek RM, Flanagan CL, Krebsbach PH, Feinberg SE, Hollister SJ, DAS S. Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4817-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.057
  61. Chen CH, Lee MY, Shyu VBH, Chen YC, Chen CT, Chen JP. Surface modification of polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering for cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;40:389-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.04.029
  62. Ciocca L, Fantini M, De Crescenzio F, Corinaldesi G, Scotti R. Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) of a customized titanium mesh for prosthetically guided bone regeneration of atrophic maxillary arches. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011;49:1347-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0813-4
  63. Sanjana NE, Fuller SB. A fast flexible ink-jet printing method for patterning dissociated neurons in culture. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;136:151-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.01.011
  64. Xu T, Gregory CA, Molnar P, Cui X, Jalota S, Bhaduri SB, Boland T. Viability and electrophysiology of neural cell structures generated by the inkjet printing method. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3580-8.
  65. Lee YB, Polio S, Lee W, Dai G, Menon L, Carroll RS, Yoo SS. Bio-printing of collagen and VEGF-releasing fibrin gel scaffolds for neural stem cell culture. Exp Neurol. 2010;223:645-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.02.014
  66. Lorber B, Hsiao WK, Hutchings IM, Martin KR. Adult rat retinal ganglion cells and glia can be printed by piezoelectric inkjet printing. Biofabrication. 2014;6:015001.
  67. Pati F, Ha DH, Jang J, Han HH, Rhie JW, Cho DW. Biomimetic 3D tissue printing for soft tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2015;62:164-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.043
  68. Irvine SA, Agrawal A, Lee BH, Chua HY, Low KY, Lau BC, Machluf M, Venkatraman S. Printing cell-laden gelatin constructs by free-form fabrication and enzymatic protein crosslinking. Biomed Microdevices. 2015; 17:16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-014-9915-8
  69. Vaidya M. Startups tout commercially 3D-printed tissue for drug screening. Nat Med. 2015;21:2. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0115-2
  70. Reiffel AJ, Kafka C, Hernandez KA, Popa S, Perez JL, Zhou S, Pramanik S, Brown BN, Ryu WS, Bonassar LJ, Spector JA. High-fidelity tissue engineering of patient-specific auricles for reconstruction of pediatric microtia and other auricular deformities. PLoS One. 2013;8, e56506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056506
  71. Rimann M, Laternser S, Keller H, Leupin O, Graf-Hausner U. 3D bioprinted muscle and tendon tissues for drug development. CHIMIA. 2015;69:65-7. https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2015.65
  72. Hockaday L. 3D bioprinting: a deliberate business. Genet Eng Biotechn N. 2015;35:14-7. https://doi.org/10.1089/gen.35.19.07
  73. Gittard SD, Chen B, Xu H, Ovsianikov A, Chichkov BN, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Narayan RJ. The effects of geometry on skin penetration and failure of polymer microneedles. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2013;27:227-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2012.705101
  74. Bilgin MS, Erdem A, Aglarci OS, Dilber E. Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM and RP technologies. J Prosthodont. 2015;24:576-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12302

피인용 문헌

  1. 3D Bioprinting for Organ Regeneration vol.6, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601118
  2. Biofunctionalized Plants as Diverse Biomaterials for Human Cell Culture vol.6, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601225
  3. 3D printing for clinical application in otorhinolaryngology vol.274, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4743-0
  4. Combined effects of multi-scale topographical cues on stable cell sheet formation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells vol.5, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00134g
  5. Additive manufacturing of polymer melts for implantable medical devices and scaffolds vol.9, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa5766
  6. In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Commercially Available Fibrin Gel as a Carrier of Alendronate for Bone Tissue Engineering vol.2017, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6434169
  7. A dual crosslinking strategy to tailor rheological properties of gelatin methacryloyl vol.3, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.2017.02.003
  8. Bioinks for biofabrication: current state and future perspectives vol.1, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2016-0002
  9. In situ printing of mesenchymal stromal cells, by laser-assisted bioprinting, for in vivo bone regeneration applications vol.7, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01914-x
  10. Quantitative criteria to benchmark new and existing bio-inks for cell compatibility vol.9, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa869f
  11. Machining of biocompatible materials: a review vol.97, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1973-2
  12. Advances in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering: Innovation and Transformation of Medicine vol.2018, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2495848
  13. Bone regeneration by means of a three‐dimensional printed scaffold in a rat cranial defect vol.12, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2532
  14. A Review of Three-dimensional Printing for Biomedical and Tissue Engineering Applications vol.12, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874070701812010241
  15. A Review of Three-dimensional Printing for Biomedical and Tissue Engineering Applications vol.12, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874070701812010241
  16. Additive manufacturing : current concepts, future trends vol.b100, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b4.bjj-2017-0662.r2
  17. Development of 3D printed fibrillar collagen scaffold for tissue engineering vol.20, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-018-0270-z
  18. Trinity of Three-Dimensional (3D) Scaffold, Vibration, and 3D Printing on Cell Culture Application: A Systematic Review and Indicating Future Direction vol.5, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering5030057
  19. Tailoring the Interface of Biomaterials to Design Effective Scaffolds vol.9, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb9030050
  20. 3D scaffolds for brain tissue regeneration: architectural challenges vol.6, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8bm00422f
  21. Effect of the pore size in a 3D bioprinted gelatin scaffold on fibroblast proliferation vol.67, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.07.013
  22. Stabilization strategies in extrusion-based 3D bioprinting for tissue engineering vol.5, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055659
  23. Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing vol.22, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0122-1
  24. Biomimetic Photocurable Three-Dimensional Printed Nerve Guidance Channels with Aligned Cryomatrix Lumen for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration vol.10, pp.50, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b11677
  25. Orthopedic Surgeons’ Perspectives on the Decision-Making Process for the Use of Bioprinter Cartilage Grafts: Web-Based Survey vol.8, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2196/14028
  26. An Overview of 3D Printing Technologies for Soft Materials and Potential Opportunities for Lipid-based Drug Delivery Systems vol.36, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-018-2531-1
  27. Bioinks and bioprinting technologies to make heterogeneous and biomimetic tissue constructs vol.1, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100008
  28. 3D Printing/Bioprinting Based Tailoring of in Vitro Tissue Models: Recent Advances and Challenges vol.2, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b00073
  29. Fabrication and Characterization of Bioresorbable Drug-coated Porous Scaffolds for Vascular Tissue Engineering vol.12, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091438
  30. A comprehensive review of recent developments in 3D printing technique for ceramic membrane fabrication for water purification vol.9, pp.29, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra00872a
  31. Acetylated Nanocellulose for Single-Component Bioinks and Cell Proliferation on 3D-Printed Scaffolds vol.20, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00527
  32. 3D printing of musculoskeletal tissues: impact on safety and health at work vol.82, pp.16, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2019.1663458
  33. 110th Anniversary: Vat Photopolymerization-Based Additive Manufacturing: Current Trends and Future Directions in Materials Design vol.58, pp.33, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02679
  34. Bioprinting functional tissues vol.95, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.009
  35. 3D printable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel for its potential application as a bioink in tissue engineering vol.23, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0152-8
  36. Recent advances in the development of nature-derived photocrosslinkable biomaterials for 3D printing in tissue engineering vol.23, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-019-0168-8
  37. Redirecting differentiation of mammary progenitor cells by 3D bioprinted sweat gland microenvironment vol.7, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-019-0167-y
  38. Rapid Additive Manufacturing of 3D Geometric Structures via Dual-Wavelength Polymerization vol.9, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00465
  39. Assessment of the Adaptation of Interim Crowns using Different Measurement Techniques vol.29, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13122
  40. Materials and technical innovations in 3D printing in biomedical applications vol.8, pp.15, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb00034e
  41. The emerging role of microfluidics in multi-material 3D bioprinting vol.20, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9lc01184f
  42. Laser-assisted 3D bioprinting of exocrine pancreas spheroid models for cancer initiation study vol.12, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab7cb8
  43. 3D printing of cell-laden electroconductive bioinks for tissue engineering applications vol.8, pp.27, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb00627k
  44. 3D printing of polymeric tissue engineering scaffolds using open-source fused deposition modeling vol.3, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-019-00048-2
  45. Additive Manufacturing and Textiles-State-of-the-Art vol.10, pp.15, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155033
  46. CAD/CAM scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: investigation of biocompatibility of selective laser melted lightweight titanium vol.14, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2019.0320
  47. Stimulus-responsive sequential release systems for drug and gene delivery vol.34, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100914
  48. Advances on Bone Substitutes through 3D Bioprinting vol.21, pp.19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197012
  49. In vitro Biomodels in Stenotic Arteries to Perform Blood Analogues Flow Visualizations and Measurements: A Review vol.14, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120702014010087
  50. Development of a Bone-Mimetic 3D Printed Ti6Al4V Scaffold to Enhance Osteoblast-Derived Extracellular Vesicles’ Therapeutic Efficacy for Bone Regeneration vol.9, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.757220
  51. Reconstruction of Vascular and Urologic Tubular Grafts by Tissue Engineering vol.9, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9030513
  52. Tissue Engineering in Musculoskeletal Tissue: A Review of the Literature vol.2, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries2010005
  53. 4D Biofabrication Using a Combination of 3D Printing and Melt-Electrowriting of Shape-Morphing Polymers vol.13, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c18608
  54. Synthesis and characterization of photopolymerizable hydrogels based on poly (ethylene glycol) for biomedical applications vol.138, pp.21, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50489
  55. The design criteria and therapeutic strategy of functional scaffolds for spinal cord injury repair vol.9, pp.13, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1bm00361e
  56. Nanotechnology for the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury vol.27, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0188
  57. Review of Low-Cost 3D Bioprinters: State of the Market and Observed Future Trends vol.26, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/24726303211020297
  58. 3D-printed models improve surgical planning for correction of severe postburn ankle contracture with an external fixator vol.22, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.b2000576
  59. Converging 2D Nanomaterials and 3D Bioprinting Technology: State‐of‐the‐Art, Challenges, and Potential Outlook in Biomedical Applications vol.10, pp.22, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202101439
  60. Smart and Biomimetic 3D and 4D Printed Composite Hydrogels: Opportunities for Different Biomedical Applications vol.9, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111537
  61. Suture Fiber Reinforcement of a 3D Printed Gelatin Scaffold for Its Potential Application in Soft Tissue Engineering vol.22, pp.21, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111600
  62. Three dimensional printed nanostructure biomaterials for bone tissue engineering vol.18, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2021.05.001
  63. New Biodegradable Drug Delivery System for Patients with Dry Eye vol.35, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2021.0126
  64. Three-Dimensional Tendon Scaffold Loaded with TGF-β1 Gene Silencing Plasmid Prevents Tendon Adhesion and Promotes Tendon Repair vol.7, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00747
  65. Advances in Photocrosslinkable Materials for 3D Bioprinting vol.24, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202100663
  66. Effects of transglutaminase cross-linking process on printability of gelatin microgel-gelatin solution composite bioink vol.14, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac3d75
  67. Harnessing shear stress preconditioning to improve cell viability in 3D post-printed biostructures using extrusion bioprinting vol.25, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00184
  68. Strategies towards kidney tissue biofabrication vol.21, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2021.100362