Biomaterials Research (생체재료학회지)

Korean Society for Biomaterials (한국생체재료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Polymer mesh scaffold combined with cell-derived ECM for osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells

  • Noh, Yong Kwan (Center for Biomaterials, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Du, Ping (Center for Biomaterials, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, In Gul (Center for Biomaterials, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Ko, Jaehoon (Department of Technical application, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology) ;
  • Kim, Seong Who (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Kwideok (Center for Biomaterials, Korea Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2015.12.31
  • Accepted : 2016.03.07
  • Published : 2016.06.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Tissue-engineered scaffold should mimic the structure and biological function of the extracellular matrix and have mechanically supportive properties for tissue regeneration. In this study, we utilized a PLGA/PLA mesh scaffold, coated with cell-derived extracellular matrix (CDM) and assessed its potential as an osteogenic microenvironment for human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UCB-MSCs). CDM was obtained by decellularization of in vitro-cultured type I collagen overexpressing (Col I -293 T-DK) cells. Test groups are mesh itself (control), fibronectin-coated (FN-mesh), and CDM-coated mesh scaffold (CDM-mesh). CDM was then solubilized and used for scaffold coating. Results: CDM was successfully collected and applied to mesh scaffolds. The presence of CDM was confirmed via SEM and FN immunofluorescence. After then, UCB-MSCs were seeded into the scaffolds and subjected to the induction of osteogenic differentiation for 21 days in vitro. We found that the seeded cells were viable and have better proliferation activity on CDM-mesh scaffold. In addition, when osteogenic differentiation of UCB-MSCs was examined for up to 21 days, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and osteogenic marker (COL I, ALP, osteocalcin, bone sialoprotein) expression were significantly improved with UCB-MSCs when cultured in the CDM-mesh scaffold compared to the control and FN-mesh. Conclusion: Polymer mesh scaffold incorporated with CDM can provide UCB-MSCs with a better microenvironment for osteogenesis in vitro.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : KIST, Ministry of Health & Welfare

References

  1. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260:920-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8493529
  2. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005;26:5474-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002
  3. Jiang Y, Chen L, Zhang S, Tong T, Zhang W, Liu W, et al. Incorporation of bioactive polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine within bilayered collagen scaffolds enhances the differentiation and subchondral osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:8089-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.014
  4. Whu SW, Hung K-C, Hsieh K-H, Chen C-H, Tsai C-L, S-h H. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of chitosan-gelatin scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33:2855-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.03.003
  5. Zhou H, Xu HHK. The fast release of stem cells from alginate-fibrin microbeads in injectable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2011;32:7503-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.045
  6. Wu C, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Fan W, Xiao Y. A comparative study of mesoporous glass/silk and non-mesoporous glass/silk scaffolds: Physiochemistry and in vivo osteogenesis. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:2229-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.12.019
  7. Jang CH, Cho YB, Choi CH, Jang YS, Jung W-K, Lee H, et al. Effect of umbilical cord serum coated 3D PCL/alginate scaffold for mastoid obliteration. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78:1061-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.04.004
  8. Hynes RO. Extracellular matrix: not just pretty fibrils. Science. 2009;326:1216-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176009
  9. Lutolf MP. Integration column: artificial ECM: expanding the cell biology toolbox in 3D. Integr Biol. 2009;1:235-41. https://doi.org/10.1039/b902243k
  10. Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:4195-200. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.023820
  11. Lu H, Hoshiba T, Kawazoe N, Koda I, Song M, Chen G. Cultured cell-derived extracellular matrix scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2011;32: 9658-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.091
  12. Guilak F, Cohen DM, Estes BT, Gimble JM, Liedtke W, Chen CS. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5:17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.016
  13. Kang Y, Kim S, Bishop J, Khademhosseini A, Yang Y. The osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow MSCs on HUVEC-derived ECM and $\beta$-TCP scaffold. Biomaterials. 2012;33:6998-7007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.061
  14. Bae SE, Bhang SH, Kim B-S, Park K. Self-assembled extracellular macromolecular matrices and their different osteogenic potential with preosteoblasts and rat bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:2811-20. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm300791h
  15. Choi D, Suhaeri M, Hwang M, Kim I, Han D, Park K. Multi-lineage differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells on the biophysical microenvironment of cell-derived matrix. Cell Tissue Res. 2014;357:781-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-014-1898-5
  16. Lu F-Z, Fujino M, Kitazawa Y, Uyama T, Hara Y, Funeshima N, et al. Characterization and gene transfer in mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical-cord blood. J Lab Clin Med. 2005;146:271-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lab.2005.07.003
  17. Choi YS, Im MW, Kim CS, Lee MH, Noh SE, Lim SM, et al. Chondrogenic differentiation of human umbilical cord blood-derived multilineage progenitor cells in atelocollagen. Cytotherapy. 2008;10:165-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14653240701817002
  18. Hoganson DM, Owens GE, O'Doherty EM, Bowley CM, Goldman SM, Harilal DO, et al. Preserved extracellular matrix components and retained biological activity in decellularized porcine mesothelium. Biomaterials. 2010;31:6934-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.026
  19. Fitzpatrick JC, Clark PM, Capaldi FM. Effect of decellularization protocol on the mechanical behavior of porcine descending aorta. International Journal of Biomaterials. 2010;62053:11.
  20. Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials. 2011;32:3233-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057
  21. Cha MH, Do SH, Park GR, Du P, Han K-C, Han DK, et al. Induction of redifferentiation of passaged rat chondrocytes using a naturally obtained extracellular matrix microenvironment. Tissue Eng A. 2013;19:978-88. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0358
  22. Chen X-D. Extracellular matrix provides an optimal niche for the maintenance and propagation of mesenchymal stem cells. Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews. 2010;90:45-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.20171
  23. Reilly GC, Engler AJ. Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation. J Biomech. 2010;43:55-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.009

Cited by

  1. Tailoring the Interface of Biomaterials to Design Effective Scaffolds vol.9, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb9030050
  2. Improved connective integration of a degradable 3D-nano-apatite/agarose scaffold subcutaneously implanted in a rat model vol.33, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328218810084
  3. Cultured cell‐derived extracellular matrices to enhance the osteogenic differentiation and angiogenic properties of human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells vol.13, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2907
  4. Engineering a multiphasic, integrated graft with a biologically developed cartilage-bone interface for osteochondral defect repair vol.7, pp.42, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tb00822e
  5. Potential of electrospun cationic BSA fibers to guide osteogenic MSC differentiation via surface charge and fibrous topography vol.9, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56508-6
  6. Cell-Derived Extracellular Matrix for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine vol.8, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.602009
  7. One-pot synthesis of cellulose-based nonwoven web incorporated with chitosan for hemostat applications vol.35, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0883911520911655
  8. Proteins and Peptides as Important Modifiers of the Polymer Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications—A Review vol.12, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040844
  9. Extracellular matrix decorated polycaprolactone scaffolds for improved mesenchymal stem/stromal cell osteogenesis towards a patient‐tailored bone tissue engineering approach vol.108, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34554
  10. Eclectic characterisation of chemically modified cell-derived matrices obtained by metabolic glycoengineering and re-assessment of commonly used methods vol.10, pp.58, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra06819e