DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Evaluation of the Korean Advance Directives (K-AD)

한국형 사전의료의향서 평가

  • Kim, KiSook (Department of Nursing, Changwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Shinmi (Department of Nursing, Changwon National University) ;
  • Hong, Sunwoo (Department of Emergency Medicine Technology, Daejeon University) ;
  • Kim, JinShil (College of Nursing, Gachon University)
  • Received : 2015.09.25
  • Accepted : 2016.04.12
  • Published : 2016.06.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate Korean advance directives (K-AD) by examining the degree of adults' acceptance and reliability of the directive itself. Methods: Survey was performed with 181 adults aged 20 or older who were recruited from three regions. A questionnaire used to examine the participants' acceptance of their K-AD in terms of visual analogue scale score of complexity, difficulty, necessity, satisfaction, recommendation. Then, a retest was carried out by asking participants to write up a K-AD again to confirm the reliability of the directives. Results: On a scale of 100, the average acceptance score was 70 or above, which represents rather high level of acceptance in all five categories. The test-retest reliability kappa values ranged from 0.592 to 0.950, and the conformity degree was moderate or high. Regarding K-AD components such as values, treatment preference, proxy appointment, differences among age groups were observed in each component. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that K-AD is a feasible instrument to analyze its acceptability and reliability for adult population. K-AD could be utilized to help people make their own decision on their end-of-life care. Further studies are needed to confirm this study results and promote widespread use of K-AD.

목적: 본 연구는 일련의 연구들을 통해 제안된 한국형 사전의료의향서(K-AD)에 대해 일반인 등에 대한 수용성과 문서 자체의 신뢰도를 평가하고자 수행되었다. 방법: 연구 대상자는 3개 지역으로부터 편의 추출한 20세 이상 성인 181명이었다. 이들 모두에게 K-AD를 작성하게 한 후 시각상사척도 상으로 복잡성, 난이도, 필요성, 만족도, 추천도의 5개 측면을 평가하도록 하였고, 이중 117명의 중년과 노인 집단을 대상으로는 2주 후 다시 K-AD를 작성토록 하여 검사-재검사를 통한 문서자체의 신뢰도를 검증하였다. 결과: K-AD에 대한 전반적 및 5개 측면에서의 수용도는 100점 만점에 70점 이상으로 '중상' 정도의 수용성을 보였다. 검사-재검사 결과 kappa값은 0.592~0.950로 일치도는 moderate 이상인 것으로 나타났다. 덧붙여 K-AD 작성 결과 우리나라 성인의 임종기 의료와 관련한 가치관으로는 고통 없이 편안하게 임종을 맞는 것이 가장 많이 보고되었고 가치관, 의료 지시, 대리인 지정 모두에서 젊은 성인, 중년, 노인 집단별로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 결론: 본 연구 결과 K-AD는 가용한 문서로 평가되었다. 따라서 앞으로 더 다양한 집단을 대상으로 K-AD를 검증할 필요성이 있고 본 문서의 정착과 확산을 위한 연구와 노력이 요구된다.

Keywords

References

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, assistant secretary for planning an evaluation office of disability, aging and long-term care policy. Advance directives and advance care planning: report to congress [Internet]. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008. [cited 2013 Aug 10]. Available from: http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/2008/ADCongRpt.pdf.
  2. Berlinger N, Jennings B, Wolf SM; Hastings Center. The Hastings Center guidelines for decisions on life sustaining treatment and care near the end of life. Revised and expanded 2nd ed. New York:Oxford University Press;2013.
  3. Kim S, Hong YS, Kim HS. Advance directives in Korea and other countries. Korean J Med Ethics 2010;13:193-204.
  4. Lee EY, Park IK, Lee IH. Proposal of model advance directives forms and analysis of advance directives forms of 4 nations. Bioethics Policy Studies 2011;5:1-25.
  5. Blackford J, Street A. Is an advance care planning model feasible in community palliative care? A multi-site action research approach. J Adv Nurs 2012;68:2021-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05892.x
  6. Hickman SE, Nelson CA, Moss AH, Tolle SW, Perrin NA, Hammes BJ. The consistency between treatments provided to nursing facility residents and orders on the physician orders for life sustaining treatment form. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59:2091-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03656.x
  7. Ko E, Berkman CS. Advance directives among Korean American older adults: knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. J Gerontol Soc Work 2012;55:484-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2012.667523
  8. Keam B, Yun YH, Heo DS, Park BW, Cho CH, Kim S. et al. The attitudes of Korean cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists, and members of the general public toward advance directives. Support Care Cancer 2013;21:1437-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1689-z
  9. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The law of cancer management [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2015. [cited 2015 Aug 10]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/법령/암관리법/(11690,20130323).
  10. Hong SW, Kim S. Knowledge regarding advance directives among community-dwelling elderly. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Edu 2013;19:330-40. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.3.330
  11. Moye J, Marson DC. Assessment of decision-making capacity in older adults: an emerging are of practice and research. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2007;62:P3-P11. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.1.P3
  12. Lee SR, Shin D, Choi Y. Perceptions of caregivers and medical staff toward DNR and AD. Korean J Hosp Palliat Care 2014; 17:66-74. https://doi.org/10.14475/kjhpc.2014.17.2.66
  13. Heo DS. End of life decision in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2008;51:524-9. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2008.51.6.524
  14. Kim S, Hong SW, Eun Y, Koh SJ. Prerequisite for Korean advance directives: from the view of healthcare providers. J Korean Acad Nurs 2012;42:486-95. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.4.486
  15. Kim S, Hong YS, Hong SW, Kim JS, Kim KS. Development of a Korean version of an advance directives model via cognitive interview. Korean J Hosp Palliat Care 2013;16:20-32. https://doi.org/10.14475/kjhpc.2013.16.1.020
  16. Kim J, Kim S, Hong YS, Hong S, Kim K. Professional opinions on advance directives in Korea. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2014; 16:273-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000000034
  17. Lemmens J, Bours GJ, Limburg M, Beurskens AJ. The feasibility and test-retest reliability of the Dutch Swal-Qol adapted interview version for dysphagic patients with communicative and/or cognitive problems. Qual Life Res 2013;22:891-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0202-y
  18. Chey JY, Na DR, Park SH, Park EH. The validity and reliability of the Korean dementia rating scale. Korean J Clin Psychol 1998;17:247-58.
  19. Donner A, Eliasziw M. A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation. Stat Med 1992;11:1511-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780111109
  20. Lee EO, Lim NY, Park HA, Lee IS, Kim JI, Bae JI, et al. Nursing research and statistical analysis. Seoul:Sumoonsa;2009.
  21. Haisfield ME, McGuire DB, Krumm S, Shore AD, Zabora J, Rubin HR. Patients’ and healthcare providers’ opinions regarding advance directives. Oncol Nurs Forum 1994;21:1179-87.
  22. Kim J, Kim S, Hong S. Facilitator and barriers to use of advance directives in Korea. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2013;15:410-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0b013e3182a001c7
  23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  24. Kim S, Hong SW, Kim JS, Kim K. Feasibility evaluation of Korean advance directives (K-AD). J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ 2014;20:639-49. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2014.20.4.639
  25. Ngo-Metzger Q, August KJ, Srinivasan M, Liao S, Meyskens FL Jr. End-of-Life care: guidelines for patient-centered communication. Am Fam Physician 2008 15;77:167-74.
  26. Koh SJ, Kim S, Kim J. Communication for end of life care planning among Korean patients with terminal cancer: A contextoriented model. Palliat Support Care 2016;14:69-76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951515000590
  27. Thomas K. Overview and introduction to advance care planning. In: Thomas K, Lobo B. Advance care planning in end of life care. Oxford:Oxford University Press;2011.
  28. Conelius J. The development, refinement, and psychometric testing of the attitude toward advanced directive survey in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2013;28: 238-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0b013e31824b2105
  29. Schubart JR, Levi BH, Camacho F, Whitehead M, Ferace E, Green MJ. Reliability of an interactive computer program for advance care planning. J Palliat Med 2013;15:637-42.
  30. Hamel MB, Teno JM, Goldman L, Lynn J, Davis RB, Galanos AN, et al. Patient age and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments from seriously ill, hospitalized adults. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:116-25. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-130-2-199901190-00005
  31. Somogyi-Zalud E, Zhong Z, Hamel MB, Lynn J. The use of life-sustaining treatments in hospitalized persons aged 80 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:930-4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50222.x
  32. Resnick B, Andrews C. End-of-life treatment preferences among older adults: a nurse practitioner initiated intervention. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2002;14:517-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2002.tb00084.x
  33. Yun YH, Rhee YS, Nam SY, Chae YM, Heo DS, Lee SW, et al. Public attitudes toward dying with dignity and hospice? palliative care. Korean J Hosp Palliat Care 2004;7:17-28.
  34. Welie JV, Ten Have HA. The ethics of forgoing life-sustaining treatment: theoretical considerations and clinical decision making. Multidiscip Respir Med 2014;9:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-9-14
  35. CCCC. Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) [Internet]. Sacramento: Coalition for Compassionate Care of California; 2012. [cited 2015 Jul 15]. Available from: http://www.coalitionccc.org.
  36. Alano GJ, Pekmezaris R, Tai JY, Hussain MJ, Jeune J, Louis B, et al. Factors influencing older adults to complete advance directives. Palliat Support Care 2010;8:267-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951510000064
  37. Kim S, Kim KS, Lee IS, Kim SY. Perception towards advance directives, hospice-palliative care, life-sustaining treatment among the middle aged adults. Korean J Soc Welfare Res 2013;37:21-44.
  38. Dunlay SM, Swetz KM, Muller PS, Roger VL. Advanced directives in community patients with heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012;5:283-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966036
  39. Wendler D, Rid A. Systematic review: the effect on surrogates of making treatment decision for others. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154:336-46. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00008
  40. Teno JM. Advance directives: time to move on. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:159-60. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-2-200407200-00017
  41. Zaide GB, Pekmezaris R, Nouryan CN, Mir TP, Sison CP, Liberman T, et al. Ethnicity, race, and advance directives in an inpatient palliative care consultation service. Palliat Support Care 2013;11:5-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951512000417
  42. Levi BH, Green MJ. Too soon to give up: re-examining the value of advance directives. Am J Bioeth 2010;10:3-22.
  43. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Life-sustaining-treatment decision act for hospice palliative and dying patients [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2016. [cited 2016 Feb 24]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=180823&efYd=20170804#0000.

Cited by

  1. Feasibility of the Korean-Advance Directives Among Community-Dwelling Elderly Persons vol.31, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000216
  2. Development and Validation of a Measurement to Assess Person-centered Critical Care Nursing vol.48, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2018.48.3.323
  3. Validation of the Decisional Conflict Scale for Evaluating Advance Care Decision Conflict in Community-dwelling Older Adults vol.11, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2017.11.004
  4. Evaluation of Outcomes of the Busan Community-based Palliative Care Project in Korea vol.12, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2018.11.001
  5. Advance Directives and Factors Associated with the Completion in Patients with Heart Failure vol.18, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041780