Journal of Trauma and Injury

  • 제29권4호
  • /
  • Pages.139-145
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2799-4317(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-1683(eISSN)
대한외상학회 (The Korean Society of Traumatology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Trauma Team Approach on the Management of Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Bone Fracture: Retrospective Comparative study

  • Cho, Won-Tae (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Jae-Woo (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jinil (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Kak (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Oh, Jong-Keon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Hak Jun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Namryeol (Department of General Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Jun-Min (Department of General Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2016.10.14
  • 심사 : 2016.12.07
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The major pelvic trauma results in high mortality with associated fatal other injuries. During early stage of resuscitation, multidisciplinary approach is essential to improve the survival and outcomes. This study aims to report the effect and positive outcome of the trauma team approach on the management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic bone fracture. Methods: This retrospective review included all patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic bone fracture admitted between March 2007 and December 2015. Patients were divided into group A, which comprised those admitted before the trauma team approach was started, and group B, which comprised those admitted after the approach was started. The advanced trauma life support protocol was followed for all patient. The comparisons between the two groups were based on medical records. Study variables included demographics, initial vital sign, injury severity score, fracture type, and injury mechanism. We analyzed the outcomes in each group with respect to the time interval for doctors' arrival, total length of stay in the emergency department (ED), time interval for computed tomography evaluation, 24-hour mortality, time interval for definitive fixation, and definitive fixation in the time-window of opportunity. Results: Fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant differences in demographic data existed between the two groups. The time interval for doctors' arrival (min, $63.09{\pm}50.48$ vs $21.48{\pm}17.75$; p=0.038) and total length of stay in the ED (min, $269.33{\pm}105.96$ vs $115.49{\pm}56.24$; p=0.023) were significantly improved. The 24-hour mortality was not significantly different between the two groups.(%, 14.3 vs 12.0; p=1.000) However, the time interval for definitive fixation and definitive fixation in the time-window of opportunity showed better results. Conclusion: The trauma team approach has positive effects, which include initial resuscitation through multidisciplinary approach and shortening the time interval to definitive fixation, on the management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic bone fracture.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Papakostidis C, Giannoudis PV. Pelvic ring injuries with haemodynamic instability: efficacy of pelvic packing, a systematic review. Injury 2009; 40: S53-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.037
  2. Gansslen A, Pohlemann T, Paul C, Lobenhoffer P, Tscherne H. Epidemiology of pelvic ring injuries. Injury 1996; 27: SA13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(96)90106-0
  3. Richardson JD, Harty J, Amin M, Flint LM. Open pelvic fractures. The Journal of trauma 1982; 22: 533-8.
  4. Cryer HM, Miller FB, Evers BM, Rouben LR, Seligson DL. Pelvic fracture classification: correlation with hemorrhage. J Trauma 1988; 28: 973-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198807000-00011
  5. Poole GV, Ward EF. Causes of mortality in patients with pelvic fractures. Orthopedics 1994; 17: 691-6.
  6. Biffl WL, Smith WR, Moore EE, Gonzalez RJ, Morgan SJ, Hennessey T, et al. Evolution of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway for the management of unstable patients with pelvic fractures. Annals of surgery 2001; 233: 843-50. PubMed PMID: 11407336. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200106000-00015
  7. Kwon CH PC, Park YT. A comparison of the Effectiveness of before and After the Trauma Team's Establishment: Treatment Outcomes and Lengths of stay in the Emergency Department. J Korean Soc Traumatol 2011; 24: 7.
  8. Kim YH YY, Lee JY, Lee WS, Sung WY, Park KN. Experience with Operating a Trauma Team at a Local Private University Hospital. J Trauma Inj 2013; 26: 5.
  9. KJ L. The Necessity for a Trauma Surgeon and the Trauma Surgeon's Role in the Trauma Care System. J Korean Soc Traumatol 2008; 21: 7.
  10. Lee DK LK, Cha KC, Park KH, Choi HJ, Kim H, Hwang SO. Effectiveness of Simple Trauma Team Activation Criteria on Prognosis of Severe Trauma Patients. J Korean Soc Traumatol 2009; 22: 71.
  11. Sugrue M, Seger M, Kerridge R, Sloane D, Deane S. A prospective study of the performance of the trauma team leader. J Trauma 1995; 38: 79-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199501000-00021
  12. Ahmed JM, Tallon J, Petrie DA. Trauma management outcomes associated with nonsurgeon versus surgeon trauma. Annals of emergency medicine 2008; 51: 332-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.08.032
  13. Davis JW, Moore FA, McIntyre RC, Jr., Cocanour CS, Moore EE, West MA. Western trauma association critical decisions in trauma: management of pelvic fracture with hemodynamic instability. J Trauma 2008; 65: 1012-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318189a836
  14. Lee SH CS, Yoem SR, Ryu JH, Jung JW, Han SK, Kim YI, Park MR, Kim YD. Effect of the Emergency Trauma Team s Management on the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Severe Trauma. J Korean Soc Traumatol 2009; 22: 7.
  15. Smith W, Williams A, Agudelo J, Shannon M, Morgan S, Stahel P, et al. Early predictors of mortality in hemodynamically unstable pelvis fractures. Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2007; 21: 31-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31802ea951
  16. Jeske HC, Larndorfer R, Krappinger D, Attal R, Klingensmith M, Lottersberger C, et al. Management of hemorrhage in severe pelvic injuries. The Journal of trauma 2010; 68: 415-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b0d56e
  17. Burgess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JW, Ellison TS, Ellison PS, Jr., Poka A, et al. Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma 1990; 30: 848-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199007000-00015
  18. Keel M, Trentz O. Pathophysiology of polytrauma. Injury. 2005 Jun;36(6):691-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.037
  19. Stahel PF, Smith WR, Moore EE. Current trends in resuscitation strategy for the multiply injured patient. Injury 2009;40:S27-35.
  20. Giannoudis PV. Surgical priorities in damage control in polytrauma. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume 2003; 85: 478-83.
  21. Pallister I, Empson K. The effects of surgical fracture fixation on the systemic inflammatory response to major trauma. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2005; 13: 93-100. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200503000-00002