DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Single-center experience of the Korean-Developmental Screening Test for infants and children

  • Suh, Chae-Ri (Department of Pediatrics, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Sohn, Su Ye (Woorisoa Children's Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Gun-Ha (Department of Pediatrics, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Seong-Kwan (Woorisoa Children's Hospital) ;
  • Eun, Baik-Lin (Department of Pediatrics, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.08.22
  • Accepted : 2016.10.18
  • Published : 2016.12.10

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the number of test takers of the Korean-Developmental Screening Test (K-DST) in a single children's hospital within a year, according to age, referral rate, and follow-up percentage. Methods: For this study, 4,062 children who visited and received K-DST at Woorisoa Children's Hospital between January and December 2015 were enrolled. Seven test sets were used according to the Korean National Health Screening Program for infants and children in the following age groups: 4 to 6, 9 to 12, 18 to 24, 30 to 36, 42 to 48, 54 to 60, and 66 to 71 months. The results of the K-DST were categorized into 4 groups as follows: further evaluation (<-2 standard deviation [-2SD]), follow-up test (-2SD to -1SD), peer level (-1SD to 1SD), and high level (>1SD). Results: The test participants' population and follow-up population were concentrated before the age of 24 months (2,532, 62.3%). The children most commonly referred for further evaluation were those in the 30- to 41-month age group. A mismatch was found between the results of the K-DST and the additional questions. Most of the infants and children with suspicious developmental delays showed catch-up development in their follow-up tests (43 of 55, 78.2%). Conclusion: The use of K-DST should be encouraged, especially among children aged over 24 months. Multiple-choice question format for the additional questions is recommended to avoid confusion. We suggest a nationwide study to evaluate and revise the K-DST.

Keywords

References

  1. Eun BL, Moon JS, Eun SH, Lee HK, Shin SM, Sung IK, et al. The current child and adolescent health screening system: an assessment and proposal for an early and periodic check-up program. Korean J Pediatr 2010;53:300-6. https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2010.53.3.300
  2. Moon JS, Lee SY, Eun BL, Kim SW, Kim YK, Shin SM, et al. Oneyear evaluation of the national health screening program for infants and children in Korea. Korean J Pediatr 2010;53:307-13. https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2010.53.3.307
  3. Eun BL, Chung HJ, Cho S, Kim JK, Shin SM, Lee JH, et al. The appropriateness of the items of Korean Ages and Stages Questionnaires (K-ASQ) developmental screening test in Korean infants and children. J Korean Child Neurol Soc 2014;22:29-41.
  4. Eun BL, Kim SW, Kim YK, Kim JW, Moon JS, Park SK, et al. Overview of the national health screening program for infant and children. Korean J Pediatr 2008;51:225-32. https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2008.51.3.225
  5. Moon JS. Review of National Health Screening Program for infant and children in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2010;53:377-85. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2010.53.5.377
  6. Im SH, Han EY, Song J. Clinical application of neurodevelopmental assessment for infants and toddlers. J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2012;23:175-80. https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.2012.23.4.175
  7. Edwards SL, Sarwark JF. Infant and child motor development. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;434:33-9.
  8. Yeargin-Allsopp M, Murphy CC, Oakley GP, Sikes RK. A multiplesource method for studying the prevalence of developmental disabilities in children: the Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Study. Pediatrics 1992;89(4 Pt 1):624-30.
  9. Chung HJ, Eun BL, Kim HS, Kim JK, Shin SM, Lee JH, et al. The validity of Korean Ages and Stages Questionnaires (K-ASQ) in Korean infants and children. J Korean Child Neurol Soc 2014;22:1-11. https://doi.org/10.26815/jkcns.2014.22.1.1
  10. Heo KH, Squires J, Lee SY, Lee JS. Korean ages and stage questionnaires. Seoul: Seoul Welfare Center for Persons with Diabilities, 2005.
  11. Kim YJ, Lee JY, Sohn JA, Lee EH, Lee JA, Choi CW, et al. A validity study of the Korean Ages and Stages Questionnaires: screening for developmental delay in preterm infant. J Korean Soc Neonatol 2010;17:217-23. https://doi.org/10.5385/jksn.2010.17.2.217
  12. Shin DH, Lee HS, Lee JY, Choi BM, Eun BL, Hong YS, et al. Usefulness of Korean infant developmental screening test in premature infants. Korean J Pediatr 2005;48:1337-41.
  13. Kim EY, Sung IK. The ages and stages questionnaire: screening for developmental delay in the setting of a pediatric outpatient clinic. Korean J Pediatr 2007;50:1061-6. https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2007.50.11.1061
  14. Eun BL, Chung HJ, Shin SM, Oh KJ, Kim YA, Kim CT, et al. A study on the development and validation of Korean developmental screening test for infant & children. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; c2016 [cited 2016 Sep 23]. Available from: http://cdc.go.kr/CDC/info/CdcKrInfo0201.jsp?menuIds=HOME001-MNU1154-MNU0004-MNU1889& fid=28&q_type=&q_value=&cid=61795&pageNum=1.
  15. Eun BL, Chung HJ. Korean-development screening test for infants and children. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014.
  16. National Health Insurance service. The status of the Korean-Developmental Screening Test for Infants and Children target popluation and the number of the actual test takers [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2016 [cited 2016 Nov 15]. Available from: http://stat.kosis.kr/nsieu/view/tree.do?task=branchView&id=350_350_35007_004*MT_OTITLE&hOrg=350.

Cited by

  1. Validity of the Korean Developmental Screening Test for very-low-birth-weight infants vol.62, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2018.07381
  2. Which growth parameters can affect mortality in cerebral palsy? vol.14, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218320
  3. Clinical Usefulness of the Korean Developmental Screening Test (K-DST) for Developmental Delays vol.43, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2019.43.4.490
  4. Determining the best candidates for next‐generation sequencing‐based gene panel for evaluation of early‐onset epilepsy vol.8, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1376