DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Policy Stream Model Using the Multi-cultural Family Support Law

다문화가족지원법을 적용한 정책흐름모형의 연구

  • Received : 2016.03.04
  • Accepted : 2016.03.21
  • Published : 2016.04.30

Abstract

The policy agenda setting is the symbolic policy of representing the public at home and abroad in addition to what a role of the government and the ruling party made a great contribution out of a political stream, rather than the policy that was formed by external group. Especially, a policy for migrant workers and married immigrant women is the important policy that will need to be solved in the global era. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to confirm a factor, which had a decisive influence upon a policy, by examining the decision-making process of 'policy for the married immigrant women' with which the government pushes ahead. A specific plan for achieving this research objective is as follows. It progresses a theoretical discussion about the multi-cultural policy in south Korea and discusses the process that the multi-cultural policy is formed. The advancing stage includes the process of forming a multi-cultural discourse, the differentiation process that a multi-cultural discourse is diversely formed, and the process of being made a policy of multi-cultural discourse, which had been formed by section.

본 연구는 정책의제형성이 외부집단에 의해 형성된 정책이라기 보다는 정치의 흐름중에서 정부와 여당의 역할이 크게 기여했다는 점과 국내외의 국민을 대표하는 상징적인 정책이라는 점이다. 특히 이주노동자와 결혼이주여성 정책은 글로벌 시대에 해결해야할 중요한 정책이라는 점과 정부가 추진하는 '결혼이주여성 정책'의 결정과정을 살펴봄으로써 정책에 결정적으로 영향을 미친 요인을 확인하기 위한 좋은 사례이기 때문이다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위한 구체적인 방안은 다음과 같다. 한국 다문화정책에 대한 이론적 논의를 진행하고, 다문화 정책이 형성되는 과정을 논의한다. 진행 단계에서는 다문화담론의 형성과정과 다문화담론이 다양하게 이루어지는 분화과정, 그리고 부문별로 이루어지던 다문화담론의 정책화되는 과정이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Wang, Hong-zen & Daniele Belanger, "Taiwanizing Female Immigrant Spouses and Materializing Differential Citizenship." Paper presented at the Conference on 'Marriage and Citizenship in Asia'. Organized by the Asian Research Institute. NUS. Singapore, October 2006:76, 2006.
  2. Kingdon, John W, Agendas Setting in Public Policy, The Essential Readings, The odoulou & Cahn Matthew A, Prentice Hall, pp.105-113, 1995.
  3. Kastoryano, R., "Des multiculturalismes en Europe au multicultiralisme europeen." Politique Etrangere 1/2000, 2000,
  4. Taylor, Charles, Multiculturalism and 'The Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.
  5. Kyumlicha, W, "finding our way: Rethinking Ethnocultural in Canada", Oxford University Press, 1998.
  6. Hwi Won Kang, "Integration of Korean Multicultural Society: Factors and Policy Directions". Public policy review, Vol.20 No.2, 2007.
  7. Kingdon, John W, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed, Crawfordsville : RR Donnelley & Sons Ins, 2003.
  8. Kingdon, John W, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: Addison-Wesley, 2003.
  9. www.immigration.go.kr, 2015.
  10. www.moi.go.kr, 2006.
  11. Sang Woo Chong, "The Legal System for Multi-cultural Family in Korea" Law Journal 26(1): 483-510, 2009.
  12. joongang.joins.com, 2005
  13. Hye Kyoung Lee, "Immigration policy and multi-culturalism, The Korean Sociological Association, pp.219-250, 2007.
  14. www.moj.go.kr, 2006.
  15. www.immigration.go.kr, 2008.
  16. www.moj.go.kr, 2006.
  17. Zahariadis, Nikolaos, The Multiple Streams Framework : Structure, Limitations. Prospects. Theories of the Policy Process. in Paul. A. Sabatier. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO : Westview Press. pp.65-92, 2007.
  18. www.munhwa.com, 2006.

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Policy Formation Process of the Basic Act on the Treatment of Foreign Residents in Korea - Focusing on the Kingdon's Policy Stream Model - vol.17, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.35224/kapd.2017.17.2.004