The Korean journal of internal medicine

  • 제31권5호
  • /
  • Pages.860-871
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1226-3303(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-6648(eISSN)
대한내과학회 (The Korean Association of Internal Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric subepithelial tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Bang, Chang Seok (Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Baik, Gwang Ho (Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, In Soo (Jeonju University College of Education) ;
  • Suk, Ki Tae (Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Jai Hoon (Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Dong Joon (Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2015.04.07
  • 심사 : 2015.07.20
  • 발행 : 2016.09.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background/Aims: To evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique for the treatment of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using the core databases. Data on the complete resection rates and the procedure-related perforation rates were extracted and analyzed. A random effects model was then applied for this meta-analysis. Results: In all, 288 patients with 290 SETs were enrolled from nine studies (44 SETs originated from the submucosal layer; 246 SETs originated from the muscularis propria layer). The mean diameter of the lesions ranged from 17.99 to 38 mm. Overall, the pooled complete resection rate was estimated to be 86.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.9 to 91.3). If the analysis was limited to the lesions that originated from the submucosal layer, the pooled complete resection rate was 91.4% (95% CI, 77.9 to 97). If the analysis was limited to the lesions that originated from the muscularis propria, the pooled complete resection rate was 84.4% (95% CI, 78.7 to 88.8). The pooled procedure-related gastric perforation rate was 13% (95% CI, 9.4 to 17.6). Sensitivity analyses showed consistent results. Finally, publication bias was not detected. Conclusions: ESD, including endoscopic muscularis dissection, is a technically feasible procedure for the treatment of SETs. However, selection bias is suspected from the enrolled studies. For the development of a proper indication of ESD for SETs, further studies are needed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hwang JH, Rulyak SD, Kimmey MB; American Gastroenterological Association Institute. American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 2006;130:2217-2228. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2006.04.033
  2. Lim YJ, Son HJ, Lee JS, et al. Clinical course of subepithelial lesions detected on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:439-444. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i4.439
  3. Kojima T, Takahashi H, Parra-Blanco A, Kohsen K, Fujita R. Diagnosis of submucosal tumor of the upper GI tract by endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:516-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70075-1
  4. Blay JY, Bonvalot S, Casali P, et al. Consensus meeting for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: report of the GIST Consensus Conference of 20-21 March 2004, under the auspices of ESMO. Ann Oncol 2005;16:566-578. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi127
  5. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Int J Surg Pathol 2002;10:81-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/106689690201000201
  6. Goto O, Uraoka T, Horii J, Yahagi N. Expanding indications for ESD: submucosal disease (SMT/carcinoid tumors). Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2014;24:169-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2013.11.006
  7. Hoteya S, Iizuka T, Kikuchi D, Yahagi N. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric submucosal tumor, endoscopic sub-tumoral dissection. Dig Endosc 2009;21:266-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-1661.2009.00905.x
  8. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003;7:1-173.
  9. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
  10. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539-1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
  11. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  12. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
  13. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. Fixed-effect versus random-effects models. In: Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR, eds. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2009:59-102.
  14. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando: Academic Press, 1985.
  15. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plotbased method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000;56:455-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
  16. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F. Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research. Chichester: Wiley, 2000.
  17. Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:1046-1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00377-8
  18. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088-1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446
  19. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  20. Lee IL, Lin PY, Tung SY, Shen CH, Wei KL, Wu CS. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of intraluminal gastric subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. Endoscopy 2006;38:1024-1028. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-944814
  21. Bialek A, Wiechowska-Kozlowska A, Pertkiewicz J, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of gastric subepithelial tumors (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:276-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.029
  22. Catalano F, Rodella L, Lombardo F, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors: results from a retrospective cohort study. Gastric Cancer 2013;16:563-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-012-0225-7
  23. Kobara H, Mori H, Rafiq K, et al. Indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for symptomatic benign gastrointestinal subepithelial or carcinoid tumors originating in the submucosa. Mol Clin Oncol 2013;1:1002-1008. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.177
  24. He Z, Sun C, Wang J, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection in treating gastric subepithelial tumors originating in the muscularis propria layer: a single-center study of 144 cases. Scand J Gastroenterol 2013;48:1466-1473. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2013.845796
  25. Zhang S, Chao GQ, Li M, Ni GB, Lv B. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. Dig Dis Sci 2013;58:1710-1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2559-3
  26. Chun SY, Kim KO, Park DS, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric subepithelial tumors that originate from the muscularis propria layer: a preliminary analysis of appropriate indications. Surg Endosc 2013;27:3271-3279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2904-9
  27. Li L, Wang F, Wu B, Wang Q, Wang C, Liu J. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric fundus subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria. Exp Ther Med 2013;6:391-395. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1181
  28. Kim MY, Jung HY, Choi KD, et al. Natural history of asymptomatic small gastric subepithelial tumors. J Clin Gastroenterol 2011;45:330-336. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e318206474e
  29. Abe N, Takeuchi H, Ooki A, et al. Recent developments in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: towards the era of endoscopic resection of layers deeper than the submucosa. Dig Endosc 2013;25 Suppl 1:64-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01387.x
  30. Liu BR, Song JT, Qu B, Wen JF, Yin JB, Liu W. Endoscopic muscularis dissection for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria. Surg Endosc 2012;26:3141-3148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2305-5

피인용 문헌

  1. Long‐term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopic resection for gastric stromal tumors less than 2？cm vol.32, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13768
  2. Comparison of ultrasound scan blood flow measurement versus other forms of surveillance in the thrombosis rate of hemodialysis access : A systemic review and meta-analysis vol.97, pp.30, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000011194
  3. Giant gastric lipoma successfully removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection: case report and systematic review vol.53, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2018.1495259
  4. Risk of overhydration and low lean tissue index as measured using a body composition monitor in patients on hemodialysis: a systemic review and meta-analysis vol.40, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022x.2017.1419963
  5. Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions vol.21, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.12850
  6. A Review of Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection, Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection, and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Resection of Subepithelial Lesions vol.55, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/mcg.0000000000001500
  7. Endoskopische Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge von Polypen des oberen Gastrointestinaltrakts vol.62, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-020-00901-1
  8. Effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection on post‑operative early treatment effectiveness and serum TAT‑2 and GP73 expression levels in patients with early gastric cancer vol.22, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10238
  9. Endoscopic resection of esophageal and gastric submucosal tumors from the muscularis propria layer: submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection versus endoscopic submucosal excavation: A systematic revi vol.35, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08659-9
  10. Long-term endoscopic submucosal dissection with postoperative lung injury: a case report vol.21, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01440-8