The Korean journal of internal medicine

  • 제31권1호
  • /
  • Pages.82-88
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1226-3303(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-6648(eISSN)
대한내과학회 (The Korean Association of Internal Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula compared to noninvasive ventilation in patients with post-extubation respiratory failure

  • Yoo, Jung-Wan (Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital) ;
  • Synn, Ara (Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Huh, Jin Won (Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Sang-Bum (Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Koh, Younsuck (Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Chae-Man (Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2014.09.02
  • 심사 : 2014.10.21
  • 발행 : 2016.01.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background/Aims: Post-extubation respiratory failure (PERF) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. High-f low nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy has been used in patients with respiratory failure, but the clinical benefit in patients with PERF remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of HFNC compared to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with PERF. Methods: A historic retrospective cohort analysis was performed in 28 beds in the medical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at a single medical center in South Korea. In total, 73 patients with PERF were enrolled: 39 patients who underwent NIV from April 2007 to March 2009 and 34 patients who received HFNC from April 2009 to May 2011. Results: The rate of avoidance of reintubation was not different between the HFNC group (79.4%) and NIV group (66.7%, p = 0.22). All patients with HFNC tolerated the device, whereas five of those with NIV did not tolerate treatment (p = 0.057). The mean duration of ICU stay was significantly shorter in the HFNC group than in the NIV group (13.4 days vs. 20.6 days, p = 0.015). There was no difference in ICU or in-hospital mortality rate. Conclusions: HFNC is likely to be as effective as, and better tolerated than, NIV for treatment of PERF.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL, Wong JB. Effect of failed extubation on the outcome of mechanical ventilation. Chest 1997;112:186-192. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.112.1.186
  2. Esteban A, Alia I, Gordo F, et al. Extubation outcome after spontaneous breathing trials with T-tube or pressure support ventilation: the Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156(2 Pt 1):459-465. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9610109
  3. Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL. Independent effects of etiology of failure and time to reintubation on outcome for patients failing extubation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:489-493. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.158.2.9711045
  4. Torres A, Gatell JM, Aznar E, et al. Re-intubation increases the risk of nosocomial pneumonia in patients needing mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:137-141. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.152.1.7599812
  5. Thille AW, Harrois A, Schortgen F, Brun-Buisson C, Brochard L. Outcomes of extubation failure in medical intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2011;39:2612-2618. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182282a5a
  6. Frutos-Vivar F, Esteban A, Apezteguia C, et al. Outcome of reintubated patients after scheduled extubation. J Crit Care 2011;26:502-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.12.015
  7. Organized jointly by the American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and the Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise, and approved by ATS Board of Directors, December 2000. International Consensus Conferences in Intensive Care Medicine: noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:283-291. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.163.1.ats1000
  8. Keenan SP, Powers C, McCormack DG, Block G. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for postextubation respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;287:3238-3244. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.24.3238
  9. Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson ND, et al. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for respiratory failure after extubation. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2452-2460. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032736
  10. Groves N, Tobin A. High flow nasal oxygen generates positive airway pressure in adult volunteers. Aust Crit Care 2007;20:126-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2007.08.001
  11. Ward JJ. High-flow oxygen administration by nasal cannula for adult and perinatal patients. Respir Care 2013;58:98-122. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01941
  12. Sztrymf B, Messika J, Bertrand F, et al. Beneficial effects of humidified high flow nasal oxygen in critical care patients: a prospective pilot study. Intensive Care Med 2011;37:1780-1786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2354-6
  13. Sztrymf B, Messika J, Mayot T, Lenglet H, Dreyfuss D, Ricard JD. Impact of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy on intensive care unit patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective observational study. J Crit Care 2012;27:324.e9-324.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.07.075
  14. Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans JR. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care 2010;55:408-413.
  15. Parke RL, McGuinness SP, Eccleston ML. A preliminary randomized controlled trial to assess effectiveness of nasal high-flow oxygen in intensive care patients. Respir Care 2011;56:265-270. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.00801
  16. Manley BJ, Owen LS, Doyle LW, et al. High-flow nasal cannulae in very preterm infants after extubation. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1425-1433. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1300071
  17. Esperatti M, Ferrer M, Theessen A, et al. Nosocomial pneumonia in the intensive care unit acquired by mechanically ventilated versus nonventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;182:1533-1539. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201001-0094OC
  18. Nava S, Gregoretti C, Fanfulla F, et al. Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 2005;33:2465-2470. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000186416.44752.72
  19. Ferrer M, Valencia M, Nicolas JM, Bernadich O, Badia JR, Torres A. Early noninvasive ventilation averts extubation failure in patients at risk: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:164-170. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200505-718OC
  20. Tiruvoipati R, Lewis D, Haji K, Botha J. High-flow nasal oxygen vs high-flow face mask: a randomized crossover trial in extubated patients. J Crit Care 2010;25:463-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.06.050
  21. Rittayamai N, Tscheikuna J, Rujiwit P. High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy after endotracheal extubation: a randomized crossover physiologic study. Respir Care 2014;59:485-490. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02397

피인용 문헌

  1. Can a high-flow nasal cannula substitute for noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in post-extubation respiratory failure? vol.31, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2016.31.1.36
  2. Comparison between the effect of heated and humidified high-flow nasal oxygen and conventional oxygen during acute hypoxemic respiratory failure vol.11, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-8426.211399
  3. Efficacy and safety of nasal high-flow oxygen in COPD patients vol.17, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-017-0486-3
  4. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is superior to conventional oxygen therapy but not to noninvasive mechanical ventilation on intubation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.21, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1760-8
  5. Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation Rate in Adult Patients After Extubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-An vol.33, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066617705118
  6. Global and Regional Ventilation during High Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients with Hypoxia vol.33, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2017.00507
  7. Dose Response to Transnasal Pulmonary Administration of Bronchodilator Aerosols via Nasal High-Flow Therapy in Adults with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma vol.98, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1159/000501564
  8. Protecting Postextubation Respiratory Failure and Reintubation by High-Flow Nasal Cannula Compared to Low-Flow Oxygen System: Single Center Retrospective Study and Literature Review vol.34, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2018.00311
  9. Comparison of high flow nasal cannula with noninvasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with hypercapnia in preventing postextubation respiratory failure: A pilot randomiz vol.42, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21942
  10. Current Status of Noninvasive Ventilation Use in Korean Intensive Care Units: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study vol.82, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2018.0064
  11. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Can Be Effective for Patients in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia: a Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study vol.35, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e67
  12. Comparison of Postextubation Outcomes Associated with High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs. Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients at High Risk of Reintubation: a Randomized Clinical Trial vol.35, pp.25, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e194
  13. Respiratory Modalities in Preventing Reintubation in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit vol.8, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794x21991531
  14. The effect of high flow nasal oxygen therapy in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.15, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2021.1937131
  15. High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial vol.11, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00922-5
  16. Effect of high‐flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta‐analysis vol.31, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15957