The Korean journal of internal medicine

  • 제31권1호
  • /
  • Pages.73-81
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1226-3303(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-6648(eISSN)
대한내과학회 (The Korean Association of Internal Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Predictive value of CHADS2 score for cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome and documented coronary artery disease

  • Kang, In Sook (Department of Internal Medicine, Green Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Pyun, Wook Bum (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Gil Ja (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2014.07.12
  • 심사 : 2014.11.20
  • 발행 : 2016.01.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background/Aims: The $CHADS_2$ score, used to predict the risk of ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, has been reported recently to predict ischemic stroke in patients with coronary heart disease, regardless of the presence of AF. However, little data are available regarding the relationship between the $CHADS_2$ score and cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective study on 104 patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent coronary angiography, carotid ultrasound, and transthoracic echocardiography. Results: The mean age of the subjects was $60.1{\pm}12.6years$. The $CHADS_2$ score was as follows: 0 in 46 patients (44.2%), 1 in 31 (29.8%), 2 in 18 (17.3%), and ${\geq}3$ in 9 patients (8.7%). The left atrial volume index (LAVi) showed a positive correlation with the $CHADS_2$ score ($20.8{\pm}5.9$ for 0; $23.2{\pm}6.7$ for 1; $26.6{\pm}10.8$ for 2; and $30.3{\pm}8.3mL/m^2$ for ${\geq}3$; p = 0.001). The average carotid total plaque area was significantly increased with $CHADS_2$ scores ${\geq}2$($4.97{\pm}7.17mm^2$ vs. $15.52{\pm}14.61mm^2$; p = 0.002). Eight patients experienced cardiovascular or cerebrovascular (CCV) events during a mean evaluation period of 662 days. A $CHADS_2$ score ${\geq}3$ was related to an increase in the risk of CCV events (hazard ratio, 14.31; 95% confidence interval, 3.53 to 58.06). Furthermore, LAVi and the severity of coronary artery obstructive disease were also associated with an increased risk of CCV events. Conclusions: The $CHADS_2$ score may be a useful prognostic tool for predicting CCV events in ACS patients with documented coronary artery disease.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA 2001;285:2864-2870. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.22.2864
  2. Welles CC, Whooley MA, Na B, Ganz P, Schiller NB, Turakhia MP. The $CHADS_2$ score predicts ischemic stroke in the absence of atrial fibrillation among subjects with coronary heart disease: data from the Heart and Soul Study. Am Heart J 2011;162:555-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.023
  3. Poci D, Hartford M, Karlsson T, Herlitz J, Edvardsson N, Caidahl K. Role of the $CHADS_2$ score in acute coronary syndromes: risk of subsequent death or stroke in patients with and without atrial fibrillation. Chest 2012;141:1431-1440. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-0435
  4. Hoshino T, Ishizuka K, Shimizu S, Uchiyama S. $CHADS_2$ score predicts functional outcome of stroke in patients with a history of coronary artery disease. J Neurol Sci 2013;331:57-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.004
  5. Sato S, Yazawa Y, Itabashi R, Tsukita K, Fujiwara S, Furui E. Pre-admission $CHADS_2$ score is related to severity and outcome of stroke. J Neurol Sci 2011;307:149-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2011.04.018
  6. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1440-1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005
  7. Daimon M, Watanabe H, Abe Y, et al. Normal values of echocardiographic parameters in relation to age in a healthy Japanese population: the JAMP study. Circ J 2008;72:1859-1866. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0171
  8. Connolly HM, Oh JK. Echocardiography. In: Bonow RO, Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P, eds. Braunwald's Heart Disease. 9th ed. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2012;200-276.
  9. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:107-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.023
  10. Beinart R, Boyko V, Schwammenthal E, et al. Long-term prognostic significance of left atrial volume in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:327-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.062
  11. Ristow B, Ali S, Whooley MA, Schiller NB. Usefulness of left atrial volume index to predict heart failure hospitalization and mortality in ambulatory patients with coronary heart disease and comparison to left ventricular ejection fraction (from the Heart and Soul Study). Am J Cardiol 2008;102:70-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.099
  12. Pritchett AM, Jacobsen SJ, Mahoney DW, Rodeheffer RJ, Bailey KR, Redfield MM. Left atrial volume as an index of left atrial size: a population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1036-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02981-9
  13. Leung DY, Chi C, Allman C, et al. Prognostic implications of left atrial volume index in patients in sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 2010;105:1635-1639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.027
  14. Lisowska A, Musial WJ, Lisowski P, Knapp M, Malyszko J, Dobrzycki S. Intima-media thickness is a useful marker of the extent of coronary artery disease in patients with impaired renal function. Atherosclerosis 2009;202:470-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.05.051
  15. Spence JD, Eliasziw M, DiCicco M, Hackam DG, Galil R, Lohmann T. Carotid plaque area: a tool for targeting and evaluating vascular preventive therapy. Stroke 2002;33:2916-2922. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000042207.16156.B9
  16. Inaba Y, Chen JA, Bergmann SR. Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 2012;220:128-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.06.044
  17. Jashari F, Ibrahimi P, Nicoll R, Bajraktari G, Wester P, Henein MY. Coronary and carotid atherosclerosis: similarities and differences. Atherosclerosis 2013;227:193-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.11.008
  18. Patel DA, Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Ventura HO. Left atrial volume index predictive of mortality independent of left ventricular geometry in a large clinical cohort with preserved ejection fraction. Mayo Clin Proc 2011;86:730-737. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0682
  19. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1561-1566. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199005313222203
  20. Verma A, Meris A, Skali H, et al. Prognostic implications of left ventricular mass and geometry following myocardial infarction: the VALIANT (VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion) Echocardiographic Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:582-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.05.012
  21. Park HW, Kim WH, Kim KH, et al. Carotid plaque is associated with increased cardiac mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 2013;166:658-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.084
  22. Komorovsky R, Desideri A, Coscarelli S, et al. Predictive value of associations between carotid and coronary artery disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:116-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.075

피인용 문헌

  1. Prognostic Value of the CHADS 2 Score for Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Coronary Artery Disease Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation—A Multi‐Center Observational Cohort St vol.6, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.117.006355
  2. Predictive value of CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for acute myocardial infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation vol.7, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04604-w
  3. Validation and Comparison of Six Risk Scores for Infection in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vol.7, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.621002