DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reliability and validity of rasterstereography measurement for spinal alignment in healthy subjects

  • Yi, Yoon-Sil (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Konyang University) ;
  • Yoo, Seul-Ki (Department of Physical Therapy, Konyang University) ;
  • Lee, Da-Gam (Department of Physical Therapy, Konyang University) ;
  • Park, Dae-Sung (Department of Physical Therapy, Konyang University)
  • Received : 2016.03.01
  • Accepted : 2016.03.22
  • Published : 2016.03.30

Abstract

Objective: The Back Mapper is one type of Rasterstereography and it can be used in the clinic without radiation exposure. The purpose of our study was to prove the reliability and validity of the Back Mapper and to compare it with the Spinal Mouse, which is an assessment tool for spinal curvatures using a wheeled mouse, and the Cobb angle by X-ray. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Twenty healthy adults participated in the test to investigate for the inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability, and concurrent validity. The tests were performed with assessment devices for scoliosis such as the Back Mapper, Spinal Mouse and Cobb's angle. Data was analyzed by an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value and a standard error of measurement for reliability and correlation analysis for validity. Results: Intra-rater reliability of the Back Mapper was good (Cronbach's ${\alpha}$=0.821-0.984, ICC=0.696-0.969) except for assessing the lordotic angle. Inter-rater reliability was good (Cronbach's ${\alpha}$=0.870-0.958, ICC=0.770-0.919) in assessment for trunk imbalance, rotation of scapulae, thoracic angle, lumbar angle, and kyphotic angle. The kyphotic angle in the Spinal Mouse had a significant correlation icompared with the Back Mapper (r=0.510, p<0.05), and the Cobb's angle from an X-ray had a significant correlation with trunk inclination (r=0.532, p<0.05). Conclusions: These findings provide good intra-reliability of the Back Mapper in healthy subjects, but the Back Mapper requires more experienced practice to have good inter-reliability. Also, the variables of the Back Mapper does not seem as appropriate compared with the Cobb angle by X-ray.

Keywords

References

  1. Park GD. The effect of pelvic correction and swiss-ball exercise on pelvic tilt and pelvic torsion in the pelvis deformation of female univ. students. Korean J Phys Edu 2007;46:573-80.
  2. Bunnell WP. Spinal deformity. Pediatr Clin North Am 1986;33: 1475-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3955(16)36155-7
  3. Winter RB. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 1986; 314:1379-80. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198605223142108
  4. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Kim J, Cho SK, Cheh G, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusions: incidence and risk factor analysis of 410 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:2731-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a7ead
  5. Bradford DS. Surgical treatment of low back pain in spine instability. Chir Organi Mov 1994;79:63-8.
  6. Livanelioglu A, Kaya F, Nabiyev V, Demirkiran G, Firat T. The validity and reliability of "Spinal Mouse" assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves. Eur Spine J 2016;25:476-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3945-7
  7. Odom CJ, Taylor AB, Hurd CE, Denegar CR. Measurement of scapular asymetry and assessment of shoulder dysfunction using the Lateral Scapular Slide Test: a reliability and validity study. Phys Ther 2001;81:799-809. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/81.2.799
  8. Guidetti L, Bonavolonta V, Tito A, Reis VM, Gallotta MC, Baldari C. Intra- and interday reliability of spine rasterstereography. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:745480.
  9. Richards BS, Sucato DJ, Konigsberg DE, Ouellet JA. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:1148-56; discussion 1156-7.
  10. Dutkowsky JP, Shearer D, Schepps B, Orton C, Scola F. Radiation exposure to patients receiving routine scoliosis radiography measured at depth in an anthropomorphic phantom. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;10:532-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-199010040-00021
  11. Schroeder J, Schaar H, Mattes K. Spinal alignment in low back pain patients and age-related side effects: a multivariate crosssectional analysis of video rasterstereography back shape reconstruction data. Eur Spine J 2013;22:1979-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2787-4
  12. Modi HN, Chen T, Suh SW, Mehta S, Srinivasalu S, Yang JH, et al. Observer reliability between juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in measurement of stable Cobb's angle. Eur Spine J 2009;18:52-8.
  13. Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach CM. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1587-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0401-3
  14. Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Holland B. Reliability of centroid, Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:E227-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200106010-00002
  15. Lachin JM. The role of measurement reliability in clinical trials. Clin Trials 2004;1:553-66. https://doi.org/10.1191/1740774504cn057oa
  16. Sobush DC, Simoneau GG, Dietz KE, Levene JA, Grossman RE, Smith WB. The lennie test for measuring scapular position in healthy young adult females: a reliability and validity study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996;23:39-50. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1996.23.1.39

Cited by

  1. The study of trunk and pelvic movement on mediolateral ramps of various ramp angles during one-legged standing vol.13, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.1735040.520
  2. Comparison of Trunk Strategy to Maintain Balance during the One-Leg Stance on a Medio-Lateral Ramp and an Anterior-Posterior Ramp vol.29, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2017.29.4.223
  3. Calibration and Validation of an Experimental Setup for the Measurement of the Cylindrical Body Shapes and Curvatures of the Objects and Subjects through the Techniques of Rasterstereography vol.38, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22581/muet1982.1901.16