Introduction
The marine ecosystem is a community of living organisms with severe competition, cooperation, and regulation occurring between them. For competition or cooperation, some plants produce allelopathic substances-biochemicals that influence the growth, survival, and reproduction of other organisms-that facilitate growth of the producing or receiving organism [21]. Allelochemicals are either beneficial (positive allelopathy) or detrimental (negative allelopathy) to the target organisms and play an important role in plant induction or defense against herbivory [18]. Allelochemicals that suppress or eliminate competing plant species have received special attention due to their potential as natural herbicides in agriculture [9, 20]. This focus has shifted attention to alternative seaweed control technologies, such as algicidal or growth-stimulating agent development based on selective natural products. For example, the red seaweed Ceramium rubrum has anti-germination activity in Sargassum muticum, Enteromorpha intestinalis, and Ulva lactuca [8]. The green seaweed Monostroma nitidum produces a microalgal growth-enhancer levoglucosan [13]. The green seaweed Monostroma arctium has a positive effect on the growth and photosynthetic activity of Porphyra yezoensis in co-cultures, cultured medium filtrate, and dry powder assays [22]. Foliar application of eckol, from the brown seaweed Ecklonia maxima, enhances shoot and root length, leaf area and number, and aphid resistance capacity in cabbage plant [16]. For the development of environmentally friendly biostimulant products for seaweed growth, natural compounds from marine plant and animal sources are the best candidates.
The red seaweed Porphyra suborbiculata is a common wild seaweed that uses a discoidal holdfast to grow on rocks in the higher intertidal zone [1]. Monospores (blade archeospores) from juvenile blades can be produced year-round by adjusting culture conditions in the laboratory. Most monospores germinate to produce new juvenile blades, which themselves produce monospores under axenic culture conditions [2]. Thus, monospores of P. suborbiculata are used as a bioassay for rhizoid and blade formation. To search for natural biostimulant or seaweed growth-enhancing products, we prepared 18 common seaweed extracts and screened for enhancement of rhizoid and blade formation at the early stage using the monospore assay. Lead extracts were further optimized for treatment concentions, and the effects during culturing with the most potent enhancer, Codium fragile, were also measured.
Materials and Methods
Seaweed, extraction, and reagents
Seaweed thalli collected from 18 different species on the coast of Korea were dried for 3-7 days at room temperature. Thalli were then ground to a powder for 5 min using a coffee grinder (HMF-340; Hanil Co., Seoul, Korea). For each 20 g sample, one liter methanol was used for extraction at room temperature for 24 hr. For a stock solution of each methanol-soluble fraction, 1 ml dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to every 40 mg dried extract. Most of reagents used in this study were of analytical grade from Sigma- Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA.
Spore collection
To obtain monospores, juvenile blades of P. suborbiculata, collected from Cheongsapo (35°9′46.47″ N, 129°11′43.76″ E), Busan, Korea, were sonicated (28 kHz) twice for 1 min in autoclaved seawater, and immersed in 1% betadine for 2 min to eliminate epiphytes. For each 24-well plate, five excised tissue pieces (each 5×5 mm2) were cultured in 1 ml Provasoli′s enriched seawater (PES) [15]. The blades were incubated at 18℃ with 40 μmol/m2/s light intensity on a 12 hr light:12hr dark cycle to obtain monospores.
Monospore culture and bioassay
Spore germination assays (for rhizoid and blade formation) were performed by adding approximately 100–200 monospores to a 200-μl aliquot of PES in a 96-well plate, which was placed in the dark at 18℃ for 1 day. After non-settled spores were removed by centrifugation (1,500 rpm, 15 min) in an inverted position, 200 μl fresh PES was added to each well with 1 μl extract (200 μg/ml final concentration). DMSO inhibited spore germination by a minimum at 0.5% (data not shown). Spore cultures were placed at 18℃ and 80 μmol/m2/s light intensity on a 12L:12D cycle for 1 week to facilitate spore development [3]. After 1 week, rhizoid formation (number of spores that produced rhizoids per total spores tested), number of rhizoids per rhizoid-holding spore, rhizoid length, blade formation (number of spores that produced blades per total spores tested), and blade length were measured using a microscope (200×). Lengths of rhizoid and blade were measured by a haemocytometer. The relative rate (%) of rhizoid or blade formation was determined by the following formula: (S/T)×100, where S = number of spores that produced rhizoids or blades, and T = total spores tested.
Statistical analysis
The experiments were repeated at least three times. Mean differences between extract and control assays were compared using Student′s t-test.
Fig. 1.Micrographs of monospores released from the juvenile blade of Porphyra suborbiculata (A) and their rhizoids and blades formed from monospores (B). The bars in A and B indicate 100 μm, respectively.
Results
To search for positive allelopathic or growth-enhancing agents in seaweeds, common seaweed extracts were tested for their ability to enhance rhizoid and blade production in a P. suborbiculata monospore assay. The 18 seaweed species tested included green seaweed (Codium fragile, Monostroma nitidum, Ulva linza, Ulva pertusa), brown seaweed (Ecklonia cava, Eisenia bicyclis, Hizikia fusiformis, Ishige sinicola, Saccharina japonica, Sargassum fulvellum, Sargassum hemiphyllum, Sargassum hornei, Sargassum thunbergii, Scytosiphon lomentaria, Undaria pinnatifida), and red seaweed (Chondrus ocellatus, Corallina pilulifera, Pachymeniopsis elliptica). Most seaweed extracts at 200 μg/ml suppressed the rhizoid and blade production (Table 1). Among the seaweed extracts tested, C. fragile exhibited significant enhancement, with 63% of monospores producing rhizoids compared with 41% of the control PES (p<0.01). Rhizoid numbers per rhizoid-holding spore also increased. In C. ocellatus and C. fragile, rhizoid length was enhanced significantly, with average rhizoid lengths of 40.2 and 34.6 μm, respectively, compared with 19.5 μm for the control (p<0.01). Regarding germinated spores, E. bicyclis extract enhanced blade formation significantly, with 27% of monospores germinating to juvenile blades in 1 week compared with 14% for the control (p<0.05). C. fragile showed blade formation similarly to the control. E. cava, U. linza, and U. pertusa extracts enhanced blade growth significantly, to an average of 14.3, 10.9, 11.9 μm, respectively, compared with 7.1 μm for the control (p<0.01). C. fragile increased blade length a little. Thus, the C. fragile extract was selected for further evaluation, based on overall enhancing activities of rhizoid and blade formation.
Table 1.Monospores were cultured in each extract (200 μg/ml) for a week. Seaweed number 1, Chondrus ocellatus; 2, Codium fragile; 3, Corallina pilufera; 4, Ecklonia cava; 5, Eisenia bicyclis; 6, Hizikia fusiformis; 7, Ishige sinicola; 8, Monostroma nitidium; 9, Pachymeniopsis elliptica; 10, Saccharina japonica; 11, Sargassum fulvellum; 12, Sargassum hemiphyllum; 13, Sargassum hornei; 14, Sargassum thunbergii; 15, Scytosiphon lomentaria; 16, Ulva linza; 17, Ulva pertusa; 18, Undaria pinnatifida; PES, Provasoli′s enriched seawater. Values are expressed as means ± SE (n>3). *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 as compared with PES control by student t-test.
Various concentrations of the C. fragile extract were added to the monospore culture to determine enhancement activity. The enhancement dose 100 (ED100) is expressed as the concentration of C. fragile extract required to produce rhizoids maximally from monospores after 7 days of culture. The enhancement dose 50 (ED50) is the extract concentration required to increase rhizoid production in 50% of monospores after 7 days. The ED100 and ED50 values reflecting the amount of C. fragile extract required to enhance rhizoid formation (in terms of number of spores with rhizoids per total spores tested) were approximately 100 and 50 μg/ml, respectively, in the monospore culture (Fig. 2). Next, growth of P. suborbiculata monospores was observed upon treatment with 100 μg/ml (approximate ED100 for rhizoid formation) C. fragile extract for 10 days. The C. fragile extract quickly enhanced rhizoid formation (Fig. 3A), rhizoid numbers per rhizoid-holding spore (Fig. 3B), rhizoid length (Fig. 3C), blade formation (Fig. 3D), and blade length (Fig. 3E) from most spores at early culture days in the monospore assay. The extract enhanced rhizoid formation after 2 days culture significantly, rhizoid numbers per rhizoid- holding spore after 3 days, rhizoid length after 3 days, blade formation after 2 days, and blade length after 1 day, respectively, from most P. suborbiculata monospores. However, after 10 days of culture, monospores began to reach almost maximum in rhizoid and blade formation.
Fig. 2.Effects of different concentrations of Codium fragile extract on the rhizoid formation from Porphyra suborbiculata monospores. Enhancing activities of rhizoid formation were expressed as % of spores with rhizoid per total monospores tested. No addition of C. fragile extract is the value for PES control. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 as compared with PES control by student t-test.
Fig. 3.Effects of Codium fragile extract on the productions of rhizoids and blade from Porphyra suborbiculata monospores during 10 days of culture. Enhancing activities were measured using rhizoid formation (% of spores with rhizoids / total spores tested; A), number of rhizoids / rhizoid-holding spore (B), rhizoid length (C), blade formation (% of spores with blade / total spores tested; D), and blade length (E). ●; C. fragile extract (100 μg/ml). ○; PES control. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 as compared with control by student t-test.
Discussion
Plant interactions in ecosystems are known to be mediated by plant active compounds, referred to as allelochemicals, which are receiving increasing attention in the context of sustainable plant management [4]. It should be paid to these chemical interactions for the development of new biostimulants. To search for such positive allelopathic agents in seaweed, common seaweed extracts were tested for their ability to enhance rhizoid and blade production in a monospore assay. Among the seaweed species tested, C. fragile showed the strongest enhancement activities. C. fragile is an edible and abundant aquaculturable green seaweed. The amount of C. fragile produced by farming in 2013 amounted to 2,045 t (wet weight), with an additional 132 t (wet weight) collected from natural populations in Korea [11]. Currently, it occurs in temperate regions worldwide as an invasive species [6]. In our previous study [10], C. fragile extracts showed in vivo anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic activities. Siphonaxanthin having anti-angiogenic effect [7] and a sulfated galactan having immunostimulating effect [12] were also isolated from C. fragile.
The C. fragile extract quickly enhanced rhizoid formation, rhizoid numbers, rhizoid length, blade formation, and blade length at the early stages of the P. suborbiculata monospore germination. Rhodophyte Gracilaria gracilis tips and chlorophyta U. lactuca growth were increased by addition of a commercial kelp E. maxima extract [17]. The E. maxima triggered rooting in cucumber [14] and tomato plants [5]. Enhancing shoot length, root length, leaf area, and leaf number in cabbage plant was caused by the phlorotannin eckol compound from the E. maxima [16]. Some seaweeds contain plant growth hormones (such as auxin and cytokinin), and the additions to media increased growth of Gracilaria vermiculophylla [19, 23]. Even though active compounds from the C. fragile is not proved yet, the C. fragile extract demonstrated a positive effect on the rhizoid and blade formation of P. suborbiculata monospores. Thus, there is potential for using the C. fragile or its extract in the seedling of commercial Porphyra mariculture. Such positive allelochemicals that enhanced favorite seaweed species may be efficacious for new seaweed management technologies, including the development of biostimulant agents based on marine natural products.
References
- Aye-Mon-Sein, D., Ni-Ni-Win, D., San-Tha-Htun, U., Htun S. and Ohno, M. 2003. Studies on Porphyra suborbiculata Kjellman (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from Myanmar. I. The morphology and 1ife history in culture. Bull. Mar. Sci. Fish., Kochi Univ. 22, 65-79.
- Choi, J. S., Cho, J. Y., Jin, L. G., Jin, H. J. and Hong, Y. K. 2002. Procedures for the axenic isolation of chonchocelis and monospores from the red seaweed Porphyra yezoensis. J. Appl. Phycol. 14, 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019504203660
- Choi, J. S., Kang, S. E., Cho, J. Y., Shin, H. W. and Hong, Y. K. 2005. A simple screenng method for anti-attachement compounds using monospores of Porphyra yezoensis Ueda. J. Fish. Sci. Technol. 8, 51-55.
- du Jardin, P. 2015. Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci. Hortic. 196, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
- Finnie, J. F. and van Staden, J. 1985. Effect of seaweed concentrate and applied hormones on in vivo cultured tomato roots. J. Pl. Physiol. 120, 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(85)80108-5
- Gagnon, K., McKindsey, C. W. and Johnson, L. E. 2015. Roles of dispersal mode, recipient environment and disturbance in the secondary spread of the invasive seaweed Codium fragile. Biol. Invasions 17, 1123-1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0782-2
- Ganesan, P., Matsubara, K., Ohkubo, T., Tanaka, Y., Noda, K., Sugawara, T. and Hirata, T. 2010. Anti-angiogenic effect of siphonaxanthin from green alga, Codium fragile. Phytomedicine 17, 1140-1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2010.05.005
- Hellio, C., Pascal, B. J., Beaupoil, C., le Gal, Y. and Bougougnon, N. 2002. Screening of marine algal extracts for anti-settlement activities against microalgae and maroalgae. Biofouling 18, 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010290010137
- Jabran, K., Mahajan, G., Sardana, V. and Chauhan, B. S. 2015. Allelopathy for weed control in agricultural systems. Crop Prot. 72, 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.03.004
- Kang, J. Y., Luyen, Q. H., Khan, M. N. A., Choi, J. S., Choi, I. S. and Hong, Y. K. 2012. In vivo anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic activities of the aquacultural green seaweed Codium fragile extracts in mice. J. Life Sci. 22, 852-856. https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2012.22.6.852
- Korea Fisheries Association. 2014. Korean Fisheries Yearbook, pp. 339-353, Uno Design Publishing Co.: Seoul, Korea.
- Lee, J. B., Ohta, Y., Hayashi, K. and Hayashi, T. 2010. Immunostimulating effects of a sulfated galactan from Codium fragile. Carbohydr. Res. 345, 1452-1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2010.02.026
- Luyen, H. Q., Cho, J. Y., Shin, H. W., Park, N. G. and Hong, Y. K. 2007. Microalgal growth enhancement by levoglucosan isolated from the green Monostroma nitidum. J. Appl. Phycol. 19, 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-006-9123-x
- Nelson, W. R. and van Staden, J. 1984. The effect of seaweed concentrate on growth of nutrient stressed cucumbers. Sci. Hortic. 19, 81-82.
- Provasoli, L. 1968. Media and prospects for cultivation of marine alga, pp. 63-75. In: Watanabe, A. and Hattori, A. (eds.), Cultures and Collections of Algae, Japanese Society of Plant Physiology: Tokyo, Japan.
- Rengasamy, K. R., Kulkarni, M. G., Pendota, S. C. and van Staden, J. 2016. Enhancing growth, phytochemical constituents and aphid resistance capacity in cabbage with foliar application of eckol–a biologically active phenolic molecule from brown seaweed. N. Biotechnol. 33, 273-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2015.11.002
- Robertson-Andersson, D. V., Leitao, D., Bolton, J. J., Anderson, R. J., Njobeni, A. and Ruck K. 2006. Can kelp extract (KELPAK®) be useful in seaweed mariculture? J. App. Phycol. 18, 315-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-006-9030-1
- Stamp, N. 2003. Out of the quagmire of plant defence hypotheses. Q. Rev. Biol. 78, 23-55. https://doi.org/10.1086/367580
- Stirk, W. A., Arthur, G. D., Lourens, A. F., Novák, O., Strnad, M. and van Staden, J. 2004. Changes in cytokinin and auxin concentrations in seaweed concentrates when stored at an elevated temperature. J. Appl. Phycol. 16, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAPH.0000019057.45363.f5
- Vyvyan, J. R. 2002. Allelochemicals as leads for new herbicides and agrochemicals. Tetrahedron 58, 1631-1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00052-2
- Whittaker, R. H. and Feeny, P. P. 1971. Allelochemicals: chemical interactions between species. Science 171, 757-770. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3973.757
- Xu, D., Li, F., Gao, Z., Wang, D., Zhang, X., Ye, N. and Zhuang, Z. 2013. Facilitative interactions between the green-tide macroalga Monostroma arctium and the red macroalga Porphyra yezoensis. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 444, 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2013.03.004
- Yokoya, N. S., Kakita, H., Obika, H. and Kitamura, T. 1999. Effects of environmental factors and plant growth regulators on growth of the red alga Gracilaria vermiculophylla from Shikoku Island, Japan. Hydrobiologia 398/399, 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017072508583