Health Policy and Management (보건행정학회지)

Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management (한국보건행정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Health in All Policies: The Evolution of Health Promotion and Intersectoral Cooperation

모든 정책의 건강: 건강증진과 부문 간 협력의 진화

  • Jhang, Won Gi (Department of Preventive Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine)
  • 장원기 (순천향대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Received : 2016.02.16
  • Accepted : 2016.03.31
  • Published : 2016.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

'Health in All Policies' is a new strategy for governance for health in 21st century. The evolution of health promotion has affected the creation of the strategy through the efforts to tackle health inequalities by addressing social determinants of health. More concern about health inequalities, involving wider policy areas, and higher level of institutionalization distinguish the strategy from the old intersectoral collaboration such as intersectoral action for health and healthy public policy. Making intersectoral collaboration the mainstream of policy making is important to address integrated policy agendas such as 'Health in All Policies' and 'Sustainable Development Goals.' Political leadership and interpersonal skills are also required to strengthen the capacity of public health sector for implementing 'Health in All Policies' in local, national, and international circumstances.

Keywords

References

  1. World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. First International Conference on Health Promotion; 1986 Nov 17-21; Ottawa, Canada. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1986.
  2. Gostin LO, Friedman EA, Buse K, Waris A, Mulumba M, Joel M, et al. Towards a framework convention on global health. Bull World Health Organ 2013;91(10):790-793. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.12.114447.
  3. World Health Organization. Declaration of Alma-Ata. International Conference on Primary Health Care; 1978 Sep 12; Alma-Ata, USSR. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1978.
  4. Zhang D, Unschuld PU. China's barefoot doctor: past, present, and future. Lancet 2008;372(9653):1865-1867. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61355-0.
  5. Smith MK. Paulo Freire and informal education: the encyclopaedia of informal education [Internet]. London: infed; 1997, 2002 [cited 2016 Jan 1]. Available from: http://infed.org/mobi/paulo-freire-dialogue-praxis-and-education.
  6. Cueto M. The origins of primary health care and selective primary health care. Am J Public Health 2004;94(11):1864-1874. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.11.1864.
  7. World Health Organization. The world health report 2003: shaping the future. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
  8. Wisner B. GOBI versus PHC?: some dangers of selective primary health care. Soc Sci Med 1988;26(9):963-969. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(88)90417-0.
  9. Lalonde M. A new perspective on the health of Canadians: a working document. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 1974.
  10. McKeown T. The role of medicine: dream, mirage, or nemesis? London: The Nuffield Provinciall Hospitals Trust; 1976.
  11. Colgrove J. The McKeown thesis: a historical controversy and its enduring influence. Am J Public Health 2002;92(5):725-729. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/ajph.92.5.725.
  12. Mason JO, McGinnis JM. "Healthy People 2000": an overview of the national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Public Health Rep 1990;105(5):441-446.
  13. O'Donnell MP. Definition of health promotion: part III: expanding the definition. Am J Health Promot 1989;3(3):5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-3.3.5.
  14. Scott-Samuel A, Birley MH, Ardern K. The Merseyside guidelines for health impact assessment. 2nd ed. Liverpool: The International Health Impact Assessment Consortium; 2001.
  15. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, European Centre for Health Policy. Health impact assessment: main concepts and suggested approach. Gothenburg consensus paper. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 1999.
  16. World Health Organization. The Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World. The 6th Global Conference on Health Promotion; 2005 Aug 7-11; Bangkok, Thailand. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
  17. Labonte R, Mohindra K, Schrecker T. The growing impact of globalization for health and public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health 2011;32(1):263-283. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101225.
  18. Donelan K, Blendon RJ, Schoen C, Davis K, Binns K. The cost of health system change: public discontent in five nations. Health Aff (Millwood) 1999;18(3):206-216. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.18.3.206.
  19. Blendon RJ, Schoen C, DesRoches C, Osborn R, Zapert K. Common concerns amid diverse systems: health care experiences in five countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22(3):106-121. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.22.3.106.
  20. Department of Health and Social Security. Inequalities in health: report of the Working Group on Inequalities in Health. London: Department of Health and Social Security; 1980.
  21. Marmot MG, Rose G, Shipley M, Hamilton PJ. Employment grade and coronary heart disease in British civil servants. J Epidemiol Community Health 1978;32(4):244-249. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.32.4.244.
  22. Marmot MG, Smith GD, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, et al. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet 1991;337(8754):1387-1393. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)93068-k.
  23. Acheson D, Barker D, Chambers J, Graham H, Marmot M, Whitehead M. Independent inquiry into inequalities in health. London: The Stationery Office; 1998.
  24. Adler NE, Newman K. Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21(2):60-76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.60.
  25. World Health Organization Commission on Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: Commission on Social Determinants of Health final report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
  26. World Health Organization. Closing the gap: policy into practice on social determinants of health. World Conference on Social Determinants of Health; 2011 Oct 19-21; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
  27. United Nations. Political declaration of the high-level meeting of the General Assembly on the prevention and control of non-communicable Diseases. Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly; 2011 Sep 19; New York, United States of America. New York (NY): United Nations; 2011.
  28. Magnusson RS. Non-communicable diseases and global health governance: enhancing global processes to improve health development. Global Health 2007;3(1):2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-3-2.
  29. Bae SS. The theories and approaches of health promotion. Korean ed. Seoul: Gyechuk Munwhasa; 2012.
  30. World Health Organization. WHO European Healthy Cities Network: Phase VI (2014-2018) of the Health Cities Network in Europe: goals and requirements. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2013.
  31. Alliance for Healthy Cities. About the Allinance [Internet]. Tokyo; Alliance for Healthy Cities; 2015 [cited 2015 Dec 1]. Available from: http://www.alliance-healthycities.com/htmls/about/index_about.html.
  32. Korea Healthy Cities Partnership. Membership [Internet]. Wonju: Korea Healthy Cities Partnership; 2015 [cited 2015 Dec 1]. Available from: http://www.khcp.kr/hb/main/sub02_02.
  33. Hancock T, Duhl L. Promoting health in the urban context. Copenhagen: FADL Publishers; 1988.
  34. World Health Organization. Zagreb Declaration for Healthy Cities: health and health equity in all local policies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
  35. Parry JM, Kemm JR; Evaluation of Health Impact Assessment Workshop. Criteria for use in the evaluation of health impact assessments. Public Health 2005;119(12):1122-1129. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2005.05.002.
  36. Department of Health, South Australia. The South Australian approach to Health in All Policies: background and practical guide, version 2. Adelaide: Government of South Australia; 2011.
  37. Kickbusch I, Gleicher D. Governance for health in the 21st century. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2012.
  38. Dooris M. Expert voices for change: bridging the silos-towards healthy and sustainable settings for the 21st century. Health Place 2013;20:39-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.11.009.
  39. St. Leger L. Health promoting settings: from Ottawa to Jakarta. Health Promot Int 1997;12(2):99-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/12.2.99
  40. Poland B, Krupa G, McCall D. Settings for health promotion: an analytic framework to guide intervention design and implementation. Health Promot Pract 2009;10(4):505-516. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1524839909341025.
  41. Baum F, Ollila E, Pena S. History of HiAP. In: Leppo K, Ollila E, Pena S, Wismar M, Cook S, editors. Health in All Policies: seizing opportunities, implementing policies. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2013. pp. 25-42.
  42. World Health Organization. Adelaide Statement on Health in All Policies: moving towards a shared governance for health and well-being. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
  43. World Health Organization. The Helsinki Statement on Health in All Policies: the 8th Global Conference on Health Promotion. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
  44. World Health Organization. The Helsinki Statement on Health in All Policies. The 8th Global Conference on Health Promotion; 2013 Jun 14; Helsinki, Finland. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
  45. Amorim C, Douste-Blazy P, Wirayuda H, Store JG, Gadio CT, Dlamini-Zuma N, et al. Oslo Ministerial Declaration--global health: a pressing foreign policy issue of our time. Lancet 2007;369(9570):1373-1378. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60498-x.
  46. United Nations. United Nations Millennium Declaration. New York (NY): United Nations; 2000.
  47. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York (NY): United Nations; 2015.
  48. Tolbert PS, Zucker LG. The institutionalization of institutional theory. In: Clegg S, Hardy C, Nord W, editors. Handbook of organization studies. Electronic version ed. London: SAGE; 1996. pp. 175-190.
  49. Ollila E, Baum F, Pena S. Introduction to Health in All Policies and the analytical framework of the book. In: Leppo K, Ollila E, Pena S, Wismar M, Cook S, editors. Health in All Policies: seizing opportunities, implementing policies. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2013. pp. 3-24.
  50. World Health Organization. Health in All Policies (HiAP) Framework for Country Action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
  51. Rudolph L, Caplan J, Ben-Moshe K, Dillon L. Health in All Policies: a guide for state and local governments. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association and Public Health Institute; 2013.
  52. California Strategic Growth Council. The California Health in All Policies Task Force: State of California. Sacramento (CA): California Strategic Growth Council; 2014 [cited 2015 Dec 1]. Available from: http://www.sgc.ca.gov/s_hiap.php.
  53. Department of Health. Choosing health: making healthy choices easier. London: The Stationery Office; 2004.
  54. Shankardass K, Solar O, Murphy K, Freiler A, Bobbili S, Bayoumi A, et al. Getting started with Health in All Policies: a resource pack. Toronto (ON): Centre for Research on Inner City Health; 2011.
  55. Lencucha R, Labonte R, Rouse MJ. Beyond idealism and realism: Canadian NGO/government relations during the negotiation of the FCTC. J Public Health Policy 2010;31(1):74-87. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2009.48.
  56. Lee K, Chagas LC, Novotny TE. Brazil and the framework convention on tobacco control: global health diplomacy as soft power. PLoS Med 2010;7(4):e1000232. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000232.
  57. Bliss KE. Health in All Policies: Brazil's approach to global health within foreign policy and development cooperation initiatives. In: Bliss KE, editor. Key players in global health: how Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa are influencing the game. Washington (DC): The Center for Strategic and International Studies; 2010. pp. 1-14.
  58. Lin V, Jones CM, Synnot A, Wismar M. Synthesizing the evidence: how governance structures can trigger governance actions to support Health in All Policies. In: McQueen DV, Wismar M, Lin V, Jones CM, Davies M, editors. Intersectoral governance for Health in All Policies: structures, actions and experiences. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2012. pp. 23-55.
  59. Wismar M, McQueen D, Lin V, Jones CM, Davies M. Intersectoral governance for Health in All Policies. Eurohealth 2012;18(4):3-7.
  60. World Health Organization. Health in All Policies: training manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
  61. Jhang WG. Challenging every determinant of health: governance and the role of practitioners in the future of public health. Perspect Public Health 2011;131(5):200-201. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757913911419148.
  62. Melkas T. Health in all policies as a priority in Finnish health policy: a case study on national health policy development. Scand J Public Health 2013;41(11 Suppl):3-28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494812472296.
  63. Greaves LJ, Bialystok LR. Health in All Policies: all talk and little action? Can J Public Health 2011;102(6):407-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404187
  64. World Health Organization. Framework for urban health in the Western Pacific 2016-2020: healthy and resilient cities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
  65. United Nations. Report of the World Commission on environment and development: our common future. New York (NY): United Nations; 1987.