The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제8권2호
  • /
  • Pages.75-84
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of silane applied to glass ceramics on surface structure and bonding strength at different temperatures

  • Yavuz, Tevfik (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Abant Izzet Baysal University) ;
  • Eraslan, Oguz (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University)
  • 투고 : 2015.09.12
  • 심사 : 2016.01.12
  • 발행 : 2016.04.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. To evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the surface structure and shear bond strength (SBS) of different ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 288 specimens (lithium-disilicate, leucite-reinforced, and glass infiltrated zirconia) were first divided into two groups according to the resin cement used, and were later divided into four groups according to the given surface treatments: G1 (hydrofluoric acid (HF)+silane), G2 (silane alone-no heat-treatment), G3 (silane alone-then dried with $60^{\circ}C$ heat-treatment), and G4 (silane alonethen dried with $100^{\circ}C$ heat-treatment). Two different adhesive luting systems were applied onto the ceramic discs in all groups. SBS (in MPa) was calculated from the failure load per bonded area (in $N/mm^2$). Subsequently, one specimen from each group was prepared for SEM evaluation of the separated-resin-ceramic interface. RESULTS. SBS values of G1 were significantly higher than those of the other groups in the lithium disilicate ceramic and leucite reinforced ceramic, and the SBS values of G4 and G1 were significantly higher than those of G2 and G3 in glass infiltrated zirconia. The three-way ANOVA revealed that the SBS values were significantly affected by the type of resin cement (P<.001). FIN ceramics had the highest rate of cohesive failure on the ceramic surfaces than other ceramic groups. AFM images showed that the surface treatment groups exhibited similar topographies, except the group treated with HF. CONCLUSION. The heat treatment was not sufficient to achieve high SBS values as compared with HF acid etching. The surface topography of ceramics was affected by surface treatments.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kon M, Kawano F, Asaoka K, Matsumoto N. Effect of leucite crystals on the strength of glassy porcelain. Dent Mater J 1994;13:138-47. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.13.138
  2. Seghi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:239-46.
  3. Seghi RR, Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF.Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:145-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80177-5
  4. Denry IL, Mackert JR Jr, Holloway JA, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of cubic leucite stabilization on the flexural strength of feldspathic dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1996;75:1928-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750120301
  5. Mackert JR Jr, Russell CM. Leucite crystallization during processing of a heat-pressed dental ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:261-5.
  6. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999;20:1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6
  7. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:725-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8
  8. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ. Microstructure, composition, and etching topography of dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:159-67.
  9. Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Ozcan M, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:155-64.
  10. de Carvalho RF, Martins ME, de Queiroz JR, Leite FP, Ozcan M. Influence of silane heat treatment on bond strength of resin cement to a feldspathic ceramic. Dent Mater J 2011;30: 392-7. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2010-137
  11. Chen JR, Oka K, Kawano T, Goto T, Ichikawa T. Carbon dioxide laser application enhances the effect of silane primer on the shear bond strength between porcelain and composite resin. Dent Mater J 2010;29:731-7. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-106
  12. Chung KH, Hwang YC. Bonding strengths of porcelain repair systems with various surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:267-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70025-8
  13. Suliman AH, Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J. Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:118-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-8
  14. Cotes C, de Carvalho RF, Kimpara ET, Leite FP, Ozcan M. Can heat treatment procedures of pre-hydrolyzed silane replace hydrofluoric acid in the adhesion of resin ceramic? J Adhes Dent 2013;15:569-74.
  15. Fabianelli A, Pollington S, Papacchini F, Goracci C, Cantoro A, Ferrari M, van Noort R. The effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between leucite reinforced feldspathic ceramic and composite resin. J Dent 2010;38:39-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.010
  16. Bertolini JC. Hydrofluoric acid: a review of toxicity. J Emerg Med 1992;10:163-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(92)90211-B
  17. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio R, Ferrari M. Effect of temperature on the silane coupling agents when bonding core resin to quartz fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006;22:1024-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.024
  18. Shimada Y, Yamaguchi S, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass ceramics. Dent Mater 2002;18:380-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00054-9
  19. Hooshmand T, van Noort R, Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface. Dent Mater 2002;18:179-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00047-1
  20. Filho AM, Vieira LC, Araujo E, Monteiro Junior S. Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensile bond strength. J Prosthodont 2004;13:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04007.x
  21. Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:60D-76D.
  22. Edelhoff D, Ozcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:193-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01442.x
  23. Roulet JF, SOderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995;74:381-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740011501
  24. Kelly JR, Campbell SD, Bowen HK. Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:536-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90075-9
  25. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:280-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70128-3
  26. Al-Dohan HM, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Shear strength of core-veneer interface in bi-layered ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:349-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.009
  27. Craig RG JP. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed. Mosby; 2002. p. 85.
  28. Choi BK, Han JS, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim SH. Shear bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia and metal cores. J Adv Prosthodont 2009;1:129-35. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.3.129
  29. de Carvalho RF, Cotes C, Kimpara ET, Leite FP, Ozcan M. Heat treatment of pre-hydrolyzed silane increases adhesion of phosphate monomer-based resin cement to glass ceramic. Braz Dent J 2015;26:44-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300212
  30. Moharamzadeh K, Hooshmand T, Keshvad A, Van Noort R. Fracture toughness of a ceramic-resin interface. Dent Mater 2008;24:172-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.002
  31. al Edris A, al Jabr A, Cooley RL, Barghi N. SEM evaluation of etch patterns by three etchants on three porcelains. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:734-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90307-X
  32. Corazza PH, Cavalcanti SC, Queiroz JR, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Effect of post-silanization heat treatments of silanized feldspathic ceramic on adhesion to resin cement. J Adhes Dent 2013;15:473-9.
  33. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Blatz U. The effect of silica coating on the resin bond to the intaglio surface of Procera AllCeram restorations. Quintessence Int 2003;34:542-7.
  34. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50
  35. Barghi N. To silanate or not to silanate: making a clinical decision. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000;21:659-62, 664; quiz 666.
  36. SOderholm KJ, Shang SW. Molecular orientation of silane at the surface of colloidal silica. J Dent Res 1993;72:1050-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720061001
  37. Yoshida K, Kamada K, Atsuta M. Effects of two silane coupling agents, a bonding agent, and thermal cycling on the bond strength of a CAD/CAM composite material cemented with two resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:184-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.113628
  38. Lu YC, Tseng H, Shih YH, Lee SY. Effects of surface treatments on bond strength of glass-infiltrated ceramic. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:805-13. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00735.x
  39. Yavuz T, Dilber E, Kara HB, Tuncdemir AR, Ozturk AN. Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems. Lasers Med Sci 2013;28: 1233-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1201-5
  40. Kansu G, GOkdeniz B. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strengths of resin cements to full ceramic systems. J Dent Sci 2011;6:134-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2011.05.002

피인용 문헌

  1. Repair Bond Strength of a Resin Composite to Plasma-Treated or UV-Irradiated CAD/CAM Ceramic Surface vol.8, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8070230
  2. Investigation of low energy electron interaction with silane molecules vol.875, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/875/7/062016
  3. Simplified Surface Treatments for Ceramic Cementation: Use of Universal Adhesive and Self-Etching Ceramic Primer vol.2018, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2598073
  4. Ceramic repairs with resins: silanization protocols vol.9, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15406/jdhodt.2018.09.00425
  5. Resistência da união ao microcisalhamento de cimento resinoso e resina fluida à cerâmica de dissilicato de lítio vol.7, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-510x.2018.v7i1.2592
  6. The effect of different ceramic surface treatments on the repair bond strength of resin composite to lithium disilicate ceramic vol.40, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-362
  7. Clinical efficacy of methods for bonding to zirconia: A systematic review vol.125, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.017
  8. Bond strengths of three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives to silane contaminated dentin vol.40, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-025
  9. Comparison of Silane Heat Treatment by Laser and Various Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin/Lithium Disilicate vol.14, pp.24, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247808