Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회논문집)

Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Fragility Analysis of High-Rise RC Box-Type Wall Building Structures

고층 RC 벽식 건물의 지진 취약도 분석

  • Jeong, Gi Hyun (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Han Seon (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Hwang, Kyung Ran (School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kwon, Oh-Sung (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Jig (Department of Architectural Engineering, Keimyung University)
  • 정기현 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학과) ;
  • 이한선 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학과) ;
  • 황경란 (고려대학교 건축사회환경공학과) ;
  • 권오성 (토론토대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 김승직 (계명대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2016.01.21
  • Accepted : 2016.03.09
  • Published : 2016.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Observations of the damages to high-rise reinforced concrete (RC) wall building structures caused by by recent earthquakes in Chile ($M_w$ 8.8, February 2010) and New Zealand (February 2011, $M_L$ 6.3) have generally exceeded expectations. Firstly, this study estimated the seismic damage levels of 15-story RC box-type wall building structures using the analytical models calibrated by the results of a shaking table test on a 1:5 scale 10-story RC box-type wall building model. Then, the seismic fragility analysis of the prototype model was conducted by using the SAC/FEMA method and the incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). To compensate for the uncertainties and variability of ground motion and its impacts on the prototype model, in the SAC/FEMA method, a total of 61 ground motion records were selected from 20 earthquakes, with a magnitude ranging from 5.9 to 8.8 and an epicentral distance ranging from 5 to 105km. In the IDA, a total of 11 ground motion records were used based on the uniform hazard response spectrum representing a return period of 2,475 years. As a result, the probabilities that the limits of the serviceability, damage control, and collapse prevention would be exceeded were as follows: from the SAC/FEMA method: 79%, 0.3%, and 0%, respectively; and from the IDA: 57%, 1.7%, and 0%, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. KNSO. Population and Housing Census. Seoul, Korea (in Korean): Korea National Statistical Office; c2010.
  2. KOSIS. APT House Living Condition Statistics: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korea, 2013. Available from: http://kosis.kr/
  3. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission (CERC). Summary and Recommendations in Volumes 5 - 7, Christchurch, the city and approach to this inquiry. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission Reports, 2012. Available from: http://canterbury.royalcommission.govt.nz/Final-Report---Part-Three
  4. Sasani M, Kiureghian AD. Seismic fragility of RC structural walls: displacement approach. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2001 Feb;127(2):219-28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:2(219)
  5. Tang Y, Zhang J. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of a slender RC shear wall considering soil-structure interaction effects. Engineering Structures. 2011 Jan 31;33(1):218-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.011
  6. Birely L. Seismic Performance of Slender Resinforced Concrete Structural Walls, University of Washington. c2012. Ph.D Thesis
  7. Jang DH, Song JK, Kang SL, Park CH. Fragility Curve Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Structures according to Various Nonlinear Seismic Analysis Methods. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2011;15(4):1-2. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2011.15.4.001
  8. Lee HS, Hwang SJ, Lee KB, Kang CB, Lee SH, Oh SH. Earthquake simulation tests on a 1: 5 scale 10-story RC residential building model. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2011;15(6):67-80. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2011.15.6.067
  9. Hwang KR, Lee HS. Seismic performance of a 10-story RC box-type wall building structure. Earthquake and Structures. 2015 Dec; 9(6) :1193-1219. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1193
  10. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings. Rep. No. FEMA-350, SAC Joint Venture, Washington, D.C. 2000.
  11. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings Volumn 1 - Methodology, prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Report No. FEMA P-58-1, Washington, D.C; c2012.
  12. AIK. Korean Building Code, KBC 2005. Seoul, Korea (in Korean): Architectural Institute of Korea. c2005.
  13. AIK. AIK 2000. Seoul, Korea (in Korean): Architectural Institute of Korea; c2001.
  14. AIK. Korean Building Code, KBC 2009. Seoul, Korea (in Korean): Architectural Institute of Korea; c2009.
  15. Wallace JW, Massone LM, Bonelli P, Dragovich J, Lagos R, Luders C, Moehle J. Damage and implications for seismic design of RC structural wall buildings. Earthquake Spectra. 2012 Jun;28(S1): S281-99. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000047
  16. CSI. Components and Elements for PERFORM 3D and PERFORM-Collapse Ver. 5. Berkeley: Computers and Structures Inc.; c2011.
  17. Ji J, Elnashai AS, Kuchma DA. An analytical framework for seismic fragility analysis of RC high-rise buildings. Engineering Structures. 2007 Dec 31;29(12):3197-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.08.026
  18. Lee SH, Oh SH, Hwang WT, Lee KB, Lee HS. Static experiment for the seismic performance of a 2 story RC shear wall system. Journal of the earthquake engineering society of Korea. 2010;14(6):55-65. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2010.14.6.055
  19. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2002 Apr; 128(4):526-33. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)