DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Performance Evaluation of Infrastructure Safety and Maintenance

시설물 안전 및 유지관리 성과 평가에 관한 연구 - 시설물 안전등급 변화를 중심으로 -

  • Kang, Sanghyeok (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Incheon National University) ;
  • Choi, Seok In (Division of Construction Management, Construction Economy Research Institute of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Hwarang (School of Architecture, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Jeongseok (Division of Institute of Infrastructure Safety Technology, KISTEC)
  • Received : 2015.09.22
  • Accepted : 2016.03.03
  • Published : 2016.03.31

Abstract

Recently, the paradigm shift of new construction into efficient operation and maintenance of infrastructure is seen. Also, concerns about infrastructure safety, especially the aged infrastructure, are on the increase. This study evaluates the current status of infrastructure safety and maintenance using data from 1994 to 2014 in Facility Management System operated by Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation. Also, a quantitative analysis of safety performance of infrastructure is conducted to find out the enhancement of infrastructure safety in Korea. It was found that safety of facilities in Korea have been enhanced for the past decades. Improvement of safety performance of facilities is attributed to periodic safety inspection and repair and reinforcement. The result of the study can be used as a basic material for efficient and effective facility maintenance policies and strategies.

최근 인프라 투자는 신규 건설 중심에서 기 시공된 시설의 효율적인 운영과 유지관리로 패러다임이 전환되고 있다. 이와 함께 시설물 노후화에 따른 안전에 대한 국민적 관심이 증폭되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 한국시설안전공단의 시설물관리종합정보시스템에 등록되어 있는 1994년부터 2014년까지의 시설물 유지관리 관련 데이터를 바탕으로 점검진단지수와 보수보강지수 등의 정량적 분석 방법론을 적용하여 유지관리 활동의 성과를 평가하였다. 또한 과거에 비해 현재 시설물의 안전도가 어느 정도 향상되었는지 안전등급 데이터를 토대로 분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과 우리나라 시설물의 안전성은 과거 대비 크게 향상된 것으로 나타났으며 안전성이 향상된 요인으로는 정기적인 안전점검과 그에 따른 보수 보강 활동의 결과로 추정해 볼 수 있다. 본 연구를 통해 도출 된 결과는 향후 시설물의 유지관리 정책 및 전략 수립에서 기초적 자료로 활용이 가능할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. ASCE. (2001). "2001 Report Card for America's Infrastructure." American Society of Civil Engineers.
  2. ASCE. (2003). "2003 Progress Report - An Update to the 2001 Report Card." American Society of Civil Engineers.
  3. ASCE (2005). "2005 Report Card for America's Infrastructure." American Society of Civil Engineers.
  4. ASCE (2009). "2009 Report Card for America's Infrastructure." American Society of Civil Engineers.
  5. ASCE (2013a). "2013 Report Card for America's Infrastructure." American Society of Civil Engineers.
  6. ASCE (2013b). "Failure to Act - The Impact of current infrastructure investment on America's economic future." American Society of Civil Engineers. Canadian Infrastructure Report Card Project Steering
  7. Committee (2012). Canadian Infrastructure Report Card Volume 1: 2012 Municipal Roads and Water Systems, Canadian Infrastructure Report Card Project Steering Committee.
  8. Chae, M. J., Lee, G., Kim, J. R., and Cho, M. Y. (2009). "Analysis of Domestic and International Infrastructure Asset Management Practices and Improvement Strategy." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 10(2), pp. 55-64.
  9. Chin, K-H., Chae, M. J., Lee, G., and Lee, K-S. (2009). "Infrastructure Asset Management Policy and Strategy Development." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 10(6), pp. 67-77.
  10. Choi, I. and Park, C. (2012). "Assessment and implications for the structural stage of development of the domestic construction industry." The Bank of Korea Issue Paper Series.
  11. Choi, S-K., Park, C-J., and Kim S-G. (2010). "A Study on Accidents Occurred in Primary Schools and on the Experimental Test of the Safety of Building Floors." Journal of Korean Institute of Educational Facilities, 17(3), pp. 21-32.
  12. Chung, K-H. and Chung, J-W. (2000). "A Study on the Safety of Stairs for Multi-family Housing." Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 16(12).
  13. Development Bank of Southern Africa (2012). The State of South Africa's Economic Infrastructure: Opportunities and challenges 2012, Development Planning Division and Development Bank of Southern Africa.
  14. Engineers Australia (2010). Australian Infrastructure Report Card 2010, Engineers Australia, Barton, ACT.
  15. Institution of Civil Engineers (2010). The State of the Nation Infrastructure 2010, Institution of Civil Engineers, U. K.
  16. Kang, S. and Lee, Y. (2013). "An Understanding of an Infrastructure Report Card of the Advanced Countries and its Implication in Korean Infrastructure Policies." CERIK Research Report, 2013-01.
  17. Kim, C-K., Hong G-H., and Gho, I-D. (2008). "Development Strategy for a Facilities Safety Management System Based on NGIS." Journal of Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea, 21(5), pp. 505-513.
  18. Kim, D. (2013). "An Actual Condition and Alternative Tasks of Aging Infrastructure." Weekly economic review, Hyundai Research Institute.
  19. Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation (2014). Facility Management System. (http://www.fms.or.kr/)
  20. Lee, S-K., Yu, J-H., and An, H-K. (2012). "Improvement of Information Collection System in Design and Construction Phases for Efficient Facility Management." Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 28(5), pp. 33-42.
  21. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (2014). "Special Act on the Safety Control of Public Structures enforcement ordinance"[2014.07.15.].
  22. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (2015). "Special Act on the Safety Control of Public Structures." [2015.01.06.].
  23. National Council on Public Works Improvement (1988). "Fragile Foundation: A Report on America's Public Works." National Council on Public Works Improvement, U. S.
  24. So, J. H., Chung, Y. S., and Kim, Y. G. (2002). "Evaluation of the Seismic Safety of Concrete Gravity Dams." Journal of Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 6(1), pp. 33-41. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2002.6.1.033

Cited by

  1. An Alternative Way to Determine Overall Performance of Infrastructure − A Case Study of Korea N Infrastructure Facilities pp.1976-3808, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1169-9