DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of modified intended use on the seismic behavior of historical himis structures

  • Cakir, Ferit (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Yildiz Technical University) ;
  • Ergen, Yasar B. (Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Amasya University) ;
  • Uysal, Habib (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ataturk University) ;
  • Dogangun, Adem (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Uludag University)
  • 투고 : 2015.02.20
  • 심사 : 2015.12.25
  • 발행 : 2016.04.25

초록

There are some modifications in the usage purpose of historical structures due to varying needs and changing conditions. However, those modifications can damage the structural system and the system stability. This study focuses on the investigation of the functional effects and usage modifications on the system stability. In this study, three different finite element models of the Hayati $Teknecio\breve{g}lu$ Mansion in Turkey are developed and the seismic responses of the models are investigated. Results of the analyses show that usage modifications might be considered as risky in terms of creating problems for seismic performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AFAD (2014), Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry, Disaster and Emergency Management Precidency, Earthquake Department, http://www.deprem.gov.tr/sarbis/shared/DepremHaritalari.aspx.
  2. Akan, A.E. and Ozen, O. (2005), "Seismic analysis of the green tomb in Bursa using Finite Element Method", Earthquake Symposium, Kocaeli, 758-762.
  3. Akan, A.E. (2004), "Some observations on the seismic behaviour of traditional timber structures in Turkey", Master's Thesis, METU, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences.
  4. Akan, A.E. (2010), "Determination of Structural Performance of Timber Pillared Historical Mosques by Finite Element Analysis", SDU Int. Technol. Sci.-Constr. Technol., 2(1), 41-54. (in Turkish)
  5. Bakhteri, J., Mahktar, A.M. and ve Sambasivam, S. (2004), "Finite Element Modelling of structural clay brick masonry subjected to axial compression", J. Teknologi, 41(B), 57-68.
  6. Cakir, F. and Uysal, H. (2014), "Seismic performance of historical masonry clock tower with adjacent walls", Earthq. Struct., 7(2), 217-231. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.2.217
  7. Dogan, N. (2010), "Seismic analysis of traditional buildings: Bagdadi and Himis", Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology-A, Applied Sciences and Engineering, Cilt 11, Sayi 1, 35-45.
  8. Dogangun, A., Acar, R., Sezen, H. and Livaoglu, R. (2008), "Investigation of dynamic response of masonry minaret structure", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 6(3), 505-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9066-5
  9. Dogangun, A., Tuluk, O.I., Acar, R. and Livaoglu, R. (2004), "Timber structural systems in buildings from past to present", Industry Magazine of Timber and Building Materials, Published by Marka Yayincilik, Yil 4, Sayi:22, 2004. (in Turkish)
  10. Dogangun, A., Tuluk, O.I., Livaoglu, R. and Acar, R. (2006), "Traditional wooden buildings and their damages during earthquakes in Turkey", Eng. Fail. Anal., 13(6), 981-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.04.011
  11. Gonul, B. (2010), "Usage of Historical Structures by Interior Protect", Young Vision on Design Symposium, Istanbul Ticaret University, 33-44. (in Turkish)
  12. Gulkan, P. and Langenbach, R. (2004), "The earthquake resistance of traditional timber and masonry dwellings in Turkey", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2297, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
  13. Hardwick, J. and Little, J., (2010), "Seismic performance of mud brick structures", EWB-UK National Research Conference, London.
  14. IdeCAD Architectural, IdeCAD Software (2007), IdeCAD Ltd. Sti., Ver. 5, Istanbul.
  15. Kocu, N. and Korkmaz, S.Z. (2004), "Determination of seismic effects on adobe materials", TMMOB. Istanbul Chamber of Architects, 2. National Congress of Building Materials, Istanbul, 52-62. (in Turkish)
  16. Kouris, L.A.S. and Kappos, A.J. (2012), "Detailed and simplified non-linear models for timber-framed masonry structures", J. Cultural Herit., 13(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2011.05.009
  17. Koylu, A. (2008), "Analysis of traditional structures under lateral loads", Master's Thesis, In Civil Engineering, Universty of Eskisehir Osmangazi University. (in Turkish)
  18. Sap 2000 (2012), Integrated Structural Analysis and Desing Software, Computers and Structures, Inc., Ver. 15.1.0, Berkeley, California.
  19. Seker, B.S., Cakir, F., Dogangun, A. and Uysal, H. (2014), "Investigation of a masonry domed mosque by experimental tests and numerical analyses", Earthq. Struct, 6(4), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.4.335
  20. Soyluk, A. and Tuna, M.E. (2011), "Dynamic analysis of historical sehzade mehmet mosque for base isolation application", J. Faculty Eng. Architec. Gazi Univ., 26(3), 667-675.
  21. Toker, S. and Unay, A.I. (2004), "Mathematical modeling and finite element analysis of masonry arch bridges", G.U. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(2), 129-139.
  22. TS500 (2000), "Requirements for design and construction of reinforced concrete structures", Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara, Turkey. (in Turkish)
  23. Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC) (2007), Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement Government of Republic of Turkey, Ankara.
  24. Venice Charter (1964), IInd International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice, Italy.

피인용 문헌

  1. Investigation on seismic isolation retrofit of a historical masonry structure vol.16, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.4.501
  2. In situ dynamic investigation on the historic "İskenderpaşa" masonry mosque with non-destructive testing vol.26, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.26.1.001
  3. Investigation on Seismic Behavior of Historical Tokatlı Bridge under Near-Fault Earthquakes vol.2021, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5596760
  4. Effect of near-fault earthquakes on a historical masonry arch bridge (Konjic Bridge) vol.21, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.2.125