중국 중재조정의 적법성에 관한 연구

A Study on the Legality of Arb-Med in China

  • 이경화 (동서울대학교 경영학부) ;
  • 서경 (서경대학교 경영학부)
  • 투고 : 2016.01.29
  • 심사 : 2016.02.19
  • 발행 : 2016.02.29

초록

According to Chinese Arbitration Law, combination of mediation with arbitration means that in the process of arbitration, arbitrator may conduct mediation proceedings for the case they are handling, provided both parties agree to do so. If mediation succeeds and the parties reach a settlement agreement, the arbitrators may render a consent award or a written mediation statement in accordance with the contents of the settlement agreement. If mediation fails, the arbitration proceedings will be resumed until the case is concluded by making of an arbitral award. There is no formal name of this system in China, it is called "combination of mediation with arbitration", "mediation in arbitration process" or "arbitration-mediation", the author of this thesis select "arbitration-mediation" and make it simply as "Arb-Med". This thesis concentrates on three issues that arbitrators and the parties have to clarify and pay attention to once they choose to use Arb-Med. The first part is about the 'waivable problems', include waive the right to challenge a arbitrator who act as a mediator at the same time with parties' approval, as well as the question about the waiver of the arbitrator's duty to disclose confidential information obtained during mediation. The second part is 'public policy in Arb-Med', introduces the concept of public policy, the bias may arise the complaint about public policy, and the due procedure problem. And the last part is about the award deals with a difference not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration, especially about the award including some contents which has relation to third party's interests.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김중년, "중국의 상사조정제도와 그 시사점에 관한 연구", 무역상무연구 제66권, 한국무역상무학회, 2015.
  2. 박석재, "중국과의 무역거래에서 UCP 600 적용상의 문제점에 관한 연구", 무역상무연구 제61권, 한국무역상무학회, 2014.
  3. 송수련, "중국당사자와 홍콩당사자간의 상사분쟁상 CISG의 적용사례에 관한 연구", 무역상무연구 제63권, 한국무역상무학회, 2014.
  4. 오원석.이경화, "한.중 국제중재제도의 비교와 시사점", 무역상무연구 제46권, 한국무역상무학회, 2010.
  5. 이경화, "중국의 '중재조정'제도와 그 시사점에 관한 연구", 성균관대학교 박사학위청구논문, 2013.
  6. 陳忠謙, "我國'大調解'格局下的仲裁調解", 仲裁硏究 第28輯, 2012.
  7. 楊良宜, 仲裁法: 從1996 年英國仲裁法到國際商務仲裁, 法律出版社, 2006.
  8. 宓思, "商事仲裁調解中的新問題及其對策分析", 深圳大學 碩士學位論文, 2013.
  9. 沈德咏.万鄂湘, 最高人民法院仲裁司法解釋的理解与适用, 人民法院出版社, 2007.
  10. 喬欣, 和諧文化理念視角下的中國仲裁制度硏究, 厦門大學出版社, 2011.
  11. 王生長, "仲裁与調解相結合制度硏究", 對外經濟貿易大學 博士學位論文, 2001.
  12. 穆子礪, "論中國商事調解制度之构建", 對外經濟貿易大學 博士學位論文, 2006.
  13. 中國民事訴訟法 (2012).
  14. 中國仲裁法 (1994).
  15. 最高人民法院關于适用 <中華人民共和國仲裁法> 若干問題的解釋 (2006).
  16. 最高人民法院關于人民法院處理涉外仲裁及外國仲裁案件的若干規定 (2003).
  17. 關于深入推進矛盾糾紛大調解工作的指導意見 (2011).
  18. 關于人民法院對申請强制執行仲裁机构的調解書應如何處理的通知 (1986).
  19. Andrew Tweeddale & Keren Tweeddale, Arbitration of Commercial Disputes, International and English Lawand Practice, Oxford University Press, 2007.
  20. Christopher R. Drahozal & Richard W. Naimark, Towards A Science of International Arbitration, The American Law Library, 2009.
  21. IBA, "IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration", the global voice of the legal profession, 2014.
  22. IBA, Interim Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards, Committee on International Commercial Arbitration, 2000.
  23. Klaus Peter Berger, "Integration of Mediation Elements into Arbitration 'Hybrid' Procedures and 'Intuitive' Mediation by International Arbitrators", 19 Arb. Int'l 393 nn, LCIA, 2003.
  24. Linda C. Rief, "The Use of Conciliation or Mediation for the Resolution of International Commercial Disputes", Canadian Business Law Journal, Vol.45, University of Toronto, 2007.
  25. Michael Hwang, "The Role of Arbitrators as Settlement Facilitators: Commentary[C]", ICAA Congress Series:574, Kluwer Arbitration, 2005.
  26. Tang Houzhi, "Mediation is Developing around the World", 17 Asia Pac. L. Rev. 31, 2009.
  27. Wang Wenying, "The Role of Conciliation in Resolving Disputes: A P.R.C. Perspective", Ohio State Journal On Dispute Resolution, Vol. 20:2, 2005.
  28. Yasunobu Sato, "The New Arbitration Law in Japan: Will it Cause Changes in Japanese Conciliatory Arbitration Practices?[C]", 22 J. Int'l Arb, Kluwer Law International, 2005.