Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Priority Analysis on the Lifelong Education Enhancing Plan using AHP

AHP기법을 이용한 평생교육진흥기본계획 수립을 위한 정책 중요도 분석

  • Received : 2015.12.24
  • Accepted : 2016.03.03
  • Published : 2016.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper reports the results of an in-depth study on sensitivity analysis based on promoting activities, the relative importance and priority setting in their sub-elements by AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. For this purpose, lifelong education experts, education administrators, lifelong educators from Daejeon lifelong education organizations participated in this Priority Analysis on the Lifelong Education Enhancing Plan using the AHP. The analysis resulted in the relative importance of promoting activities; 1) realizing of lifelong education system oriented by universities, 2) setting up the integrated online and offline lifelong education, 3) strengthening the lifelong education of local universities, 4) offering customized lifelong education by generation and target group, 5) strengthening the lifelong education of local governments, and 6) advancing the quality of lifelong education by focusing on the professionalism and transparency. This suggests that realization of a lifelong education system oriented by universities and the reorganization of an university system for adult learners have greater importance among other tasks and elements in carrying out the 3rd lifelong education enhancing plan.

본 연구는 AHP기법을 이용한 평생교육진흥기본계획 수립을 위한 정책 중요도 분석을 위해 대전시 평생교육 실천현장의 평생교육전문가와 평생교육기관장, 평생교육담당자 및 평생교육사 32명을 대상으로 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)방법을 활용하여 추진과제의 영역과 하위 요소의 상대적 중요도와 우선순위를 조사하고 민감도 분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 추진과제 영역별 상대적 중요도는 1) 대학 중심 평생교육체제 실현 2) 온 오프라인 평생학습 종합지원체제 구축 3) 사회통합을 위한 맞춤형 평생학습 지원 4)지역사회의 학습역량 강화 순으로 나타났다. 추진과제 요소별 상대적 중요도는 1) 성인학습자를 위한 대학체제 전환 2) 온라인 평생학습 지원체제 구축 3) 지역대학의 평생교육 역할 강화 4) 세대별 대상별 맞춤형 평생학습 지원 5) 기초 광역 지자체의 평생교육 추진체제 강화 6) 전문성 투명성 강화를 통한 평생교육 질적 향상 등의 순으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구결과는 앞으로 제3차 평생교육진흥기본계획 수행에 있어서 추진과제의 영역 및 요소들이 모두 중요하지만 그 중에서도 특히 '대학 중심 평생교육체제 실현' 영역과 '성인학습자를 위한 대학체제 전환' 요소 등에 대한 비중있는 수행이 이루어져야 함을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development, "Lifelong education promotion basic plan: The Joy of Learning, sharing joy recognized social learning and realization", Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development, 2002.
  2. Ministry of Education, "100 age times for the third national lifelong learning system, Build cars lifelong education promotion basic plan(within)", Ministry of Education Department of Education lifelong career, 2013.
  3. H. S. Lee, "waiting for the lifelong education plan, version 3.0 Age", cabingirl.blog.me/120123263908, 2010.
  4. G. T. Jo, S. J. Kim, D. S. Kim, Y. W. Jo, J. I. Lee, "The priorities set in the promising field of rural development support technology investments by focusing on the AHP", Journal of Rural Planning, 9(3), 41-46, 2003.
  5. Y. C. Choi, S. J. Park, M. H. Kim, S. H. Oh, "The superintendent elect an alternative navigation system stakeholders through AHP analysis", Journal of Local Government Studies, 15 (1), 51-73, 2011.
  6. S. J. Park, Y. C. Chol, "AHP analysis of the priorities of the education agency support functions", Journal of Educational Administration Research, 28(4), 281-330, 2010.
  7. S. J. Park, S. L. Mo, D. O. Hong, "AHP analysis of the role education profession", Journal of Korea Teachers Study, 28(1), 221-242, 2011.
  8. M. S. Park, S. J. Park, E. S. Jang, "Analyze the relative importance of lifelong educator duties", CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 33(1), 165-186, 2012. https://doi.org/10.18612/cnujes.2012.33.1.165
  9. S. H. Han, M. S. Park, "An Analysis on the Relative Importance of Municipal and Provincial Lifelong Education Institutes' Task", The Journal of Yeolin Education, 22(2), 43-65, 2014.
  10. S. H. Han, M. S. Park, "An Analysis of the AHP of the Lifelong Education Program based on the Six Classification Scheme", Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial, 16(2), 995-1005, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.2.995
  11. E. S. Jang, M. S. park, Analysis of Importance Factors in the Participation of Adult learners in the Lifelong learning Using the AHP Method", CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 36(1), 21-42. 2015. https://doi.org/10.18612/cnujes.2015.36.1.21
  12. M. S. Park, S. H. Lim, "An Analysis of the Relative Importance of the Education Welfare Program of the Education Welfare Priority Support Project", Journal of YOUTH Welfare, 17(2), 31-54, 2015.
  13. M. S. Park, "AHP Analysis on the Promotion Subject of the Third Lifelong Education Enhancing Plan", 2015 Korea Academic Society Conference 2, 701-703, 2015.
  14. Saaty, Thomas, L, "Reflections and projections on creativity in operations research and management science: A", Operations Research Society of America, 46(1), 9, 1998.