DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis on Digital Preservation Practices in Academic Libraries

대학도서관에서의 디지털보존 실태분석 연구

  • Received : 2016.03.09
  • Accepted : 2016.03.16
  • Published : 2016.03.30

Abstract

Digital preservation becomes, nowadays, one of the important business process in the academic libraries. This study is to investigate the librarians' perception on digital preservation requirements and to analyze the business practices of the digital preservation and digital preservation level in the 102 academic libraries. In results, it is found that the digital preservation specialists in academic libraries have almost same perception on basic policies and direction. Also, the study finds that the important function of digital preservation is to secure authenticity and integrity; policy and expertise are the most important key components for digital preservation; the most frequently reported barriers to preservation are the lack of willingness and funding problems; most librarians want to learn and train how to establish preservation planning and policy. In general, most librarian think that the level of digital preservation in the academic libraries is insufficiency. Therefore the academic libraries should establish the relevant digital preservation policy and business workflows and to develop capacity of digital preservation.

디지털보존은 디지털콘텐츠를 관리하고 있는 대학도서관에서는 또 하나의 중요한 업무로 인지되고 있다. 본 연구는 대학도서관에서 이루어지고 있는 디지털보존에 대한 실태를 파악하기 위하여 전국 4년제 대학의 대학도서관 중 디지털콘텐츠를 구축하고 있는 102개 도서관을 대상으로 디지털보존 요건에 대한 담당자의 인식과 디지털보존 실무 현황 및 그 수준을 분석하였다. 연구결과, 대다수의 디지털보존 담당자들은 진본성 보장을 가장 중요하게 여겼고, 정책 및 업무절차가 적합하게 수립되어야 하며 담당자는 우선적으로 디지털보존에 대한 전문지식을 갖추어야 한다고 하였다. 또 기관의지의 부재와 예산확보의 어려움이 디지털보존의 가장 큰 장애 요인이었으며 디지털보존 계획 및 정책수립에 대한 교육이 가장 필요하다고 하였다. 또한 디지털보존에 대한 인식 및 실태가 대학규모와 콘텐츠구축 규모에 따라 차이가 있을 것이라 보고 규모별로 서로 비교한 결과, 규모와 상관없이 인식과 실무는 거의 유사한 것으로 나타났다. 대학의 규모와 콘텐츠 구축의 규모가 크면 클수록 디지털보존 수준에 대한 평가는 높았지만, 전체적으로 현재의 국내 대학도서관의 디지털보존 수준은 미흡하다고 보았다. 따라서 앞으로의 대학도서관은 디지털보존을 위한 정책 및 업무절차를 미래지향적으로 수립하고 디지털보존을 위한 기술적 역량을 확장시켜야 할 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한성대학교

References

  1. 김명옥, 리상용 (2010). 전자기록물의 장기보존을 위한 기능요소 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 10(2), 101-126.(Kim, Myeong-Ok, & Lee, Sang-Yong (2010). A study on the functional elements for long-term preservation of electronic records. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 10(2), 101-126.)
  2. 김명훈, 오명진, 이재홍, 임진희 (2013). 전자기록 장기보존 전략으로서의 에뮬레이션 사례 분석. 기록학연구, 29, 266-309.(Kim, Myung-Hun, Oh, Myung-Jin, Lee, Jae-Hong, & Yim, Jin-Hee (2013). An analysis of cases of emulation for long term electronic records preservation strategy. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 29, 266-309.)
  3. 박옥남 (2012). PREMIS 기반 보존 메타데이터 요소개발에 관한 연구: 국립중앙도서관 디지털자료를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(2), 83-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2012.46.2.083(Park, Ok Nam (2012). A study of developing preservation metadata based on PREMIS focusing on digital data in National Library of Korea. Journal of the Korean society for Library and Information Science, 46(2), 83-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2012.46.2.083)
  4. 이소연 (2013). 국내 디지털 보존 연구의 동향 분석. 한국기록관리학회지, 13(2), 247-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2013.13.2.247(Lee, So-Yeon (2013). Trends analysis of digital preservation research in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 13(2), 247-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2013.13.2.247)
  5. 임진희 (2011). DRAMBORA를 응용한 전자기록 장기보존 업무 위험관리체계 연구. 기록학연구, 27, 119-176.(Yim, Jin-Hee (2011). A study on the risk management framework for the long-term preservation business of electronic records. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 27, 119-176.)
  6. 임진희 (2014). 전자기록 장기보존 위험관리 사례. 기록학연구, 39, 3-43.(Yim, Jin-Hee (2014). Case study on the risk management for the long-term preservation business activities related to electronic records. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 39, 3-43.)
  7. 장보성, 남영준 (2011). 디지털 연구성과물의 장기보존을 위한 메타데이터에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 42(4), 281-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.4.201112.281(Jang, Bo-Seong, & Nam, Young-Joon (2011). A study of metadata for long-term preservation of digital research outcome. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(4), 281-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.4.201112.281)
  8. 정영미, 윤화묵, 김정택 (2010). 디지털 콘텐츠의 무결성 유지를 위한 장기적인 보존 정책에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구, 41(4), 205-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/jim.2010.41.4.205(Jung, Young-Mi, Yoon, Hwa-Mook, & Kim, Jeong-Taek (2010). A study on the preservation policy for maintaining the integrity of digital contents. Journal of Information Management, 41(4), 205-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/jim.2010.41.4.205)
  9. 한국학술정보원 (2015). 2015 대학도서관 통계분석 자료집. 대구: 한국학술정보원.(Korea Education & Research Information Service (2015). 2015 statistical analysis of academic libraries. Daegu: Korea Education & Research Information Service.)
  10. 황윤영, 이규철 (2013). 이질적 전자기록물로 구성된 복합전자기록물 장기보존에 관한 연구 조사 및 분석. 한국전자거래학회지, 18(4), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2013.18.4.001(Hwang, Yun-Young, & Lee, Kyu-Chul (2013). A survey on long-term preservation of composite electronic records with heterogeneous electronic records. Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 8(4), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2013.18.4.001)
  11. 현문수 (2011). 디지털 연구데이터 장기보존의 편익에 대한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 11(1), 161-181.(Hyun, Moonsoo (2011). A study on benefits of digital preservation of research data. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 11(1), 161-181.)
  12. Bote, J., Fernandez-Feijoo, B., & Ruiz, S. (2012). The cost of digital preservation: A methodological analysis. Procedia Technology, 5, 103-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.012
  13. Brown, A. (2013). Practical digital preservation: A how-to guide for organization of any size. London: Facet Publishing.
  14. Burda, D., & Teuteberg, F. (2013). Sustaining accessibility of information through digital preservation: A literature review. Journal of Information Science, 39(4), 442-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551513480107
  15. Chowdhury, G. (2010). From digital libraries to digital preservation research: The importance of users and context. Journal of Documentation, 66(2), 207-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411011023625
  16. Decman, M., & Vintar, M. (2013). A possible solution for digital preservation of e-government: A centralized repository within a cloud computing framework. Aslib Proceedings, 65(4), 406-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ap-05-2012-0049
  17. DeRidder, J. (2013). First aid training for those on the front lines: Digital preservation needs survey results 2012. Information Technology and Libraries, 32(June), 18-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v32i2.3123
  18. Gould, S., Ebson, R., & Varlamoff, M. (1999). IFLA/UNESCO survey on digitization and preservation. UESCO.
  19. Gracy, K. F., & Kahn, M. B. (2011). Preservation in the digital age: A review of preservation literature, 2009-10. LRTS, 56(1), 25-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.56n1.25
  20. ICPSR (2012). ICPSR dgital peservation policy framework. Retrieved from http://www.icspr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/datamanagement/preservation/policies/dpp-framework.html
  21. Otto, J. J. (2013). Administrative metadata for long-term preservation and management of resources: A survey of current practices in ARL libraries. LRTS, 58(1), 4-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.58n1.4
  22. Lievesley, D. (1995) Strategies for managing electronic resources. Retrieved from http://www.uklon.ac.uk/services/papers/bl/rdr6238/paper.html/#lievesley
  23. McMillan, G., Schultz, M., & Skinner, K. (2011). SPEC kit 325: Digital preservation. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
  24. The OCLC/RLG Working Group (2002). Preservation metadata and the OAIS information model: A metadata framework to support the preservation of digital objects. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/activities/pmwg/pm_framework.pdf
  25. Perrin, J. M., Winker, H. M., & Yang, L. (2015). Digital preservation challenges with an ETD collection-a case study at Texas Tech University. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41, 98-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.11.002
  26. Ravenwood, C., Matthews, G., & Muir, A. (2012). Selection of digital material for preservation in libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 45(4), 294-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000612452030
  27. Russell, K. (1999). Digital preservation: Ensuring access to digital materials into the future. Retrieved from www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/chapter.htm
  28. Svard, P. (2013). Enterprise content management and the records continuum model as strategies for long-term preservation of digital information. Record Management Journal, 23(3), 159-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/rmj-12-2012-0035
  29. Teper, J. H. (2014). Selection for preservation: survey of current practices in the field of preservation. LRTS, 58(4), 220-232. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.58n4.220
  30. Voutssas, J. (2012). Long-term digital information preservation: Challenges in Latin America. Aslib Proceedings, 64(1), 83-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00012531211196729