과제정보
연구 과제 주관 기관 : 연세대학교
참고문헌
- 강범일, 이재윤 (2014). 트위터 관련 연구에 대한 계량정보학적 분석. 정보관리학회지, 31(3), 293-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2014.31.3.293(Kang, Beomil, & Lee, Jae Yun (2014). A bibliometric analysis on twitter research. Journal ofthe Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3), 293-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2014.31.3.293)
- 박소윤 (2013). 문헌정보학 분야의 학제성과 연구 영향력에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과.(Park, So Yoon (2013). A study on interdisciplinarity and research impact in the field of libraryand information science. Master's Thesis. The Graduate School of Ewha Womans University. Department of Library and Information Science.)
- 박자현, 송민 (2013). 토픽모델링을 활용한 국내 문헌정보학 연구동향 분석. 정보관리학회지, 30(1), 7-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.1.007(Park, Ja-Hyun, & Song, Min (2013). A study on the research trends in library & informationscience in Korea using topic modeling. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(1), 7-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.1.007)
- Adams, J., Jackson, L., & Marshall, S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of interdisciplinary research. Report to Higher Education Funding Council for England.
- Bache, K., Newman, D., & Smyth, P. (2013). Text-based measures of document diversity. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 23-31. ACM. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2487575.2487672
- Bordons, M., Morillo, F., & Gomez, I. (2004). Analysis of cross-disciplinary research through bibliometric tools. In H. F. Moed, W. Glanzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 437-456). Dordrecht: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_20
- Brillouin, L. (1956). Science and information theory. New York: Academic Press.
- Carayol, N., & Thi, T. U. N. (2005). Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research?. Research evaluation, 14(1), 70-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154405781776355
- Chua, A. Y., & Yang, C. C. (2008). The shift towards multi‐disciplinarity in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2156-2170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20929
- Cronin, B., & Meho, L. I. (2008). The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(4), 551-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20764
- Ding, Y., Liu, X., Guo, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 583-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.003
- Herring, S. D. (1999). The value of interdisciplinarity: A study based on the design of Internet search engines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(4), 358-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1999)50:4<358::aid-asi14>3.0.co;2-7
- Lariviere, V., & Gingras, Y. (2010). On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 126-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21226
- Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2009). The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics, 78(1), 45-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1927-1
- Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2011). Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 87-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.09.002
- Leydesdorff, L., Rafols, I., & Chen, C. (2013). Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12), 2573-2586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22946
- Mann, G. S., Mimno, D., & McCallum, A. (2006). Bibliometric impact measures leveraging topic analysis. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference, 65-74. IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1141753.1141765
- Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500106
- Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010529114941
- Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237-1249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10326
- National Academies (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (Cosepup) & Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
- Nichols, L. G. (2014). A topic model approach to measuring interdisciplinarity at the National Science Foundation. Scientometrics, 100(3), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1319-2
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1998). Interdisciplinarity in science and technology. Directorate for science. technology and industry. Paris: OECD.
- Porter, A. L., & Chubin, D. E. (1985). An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics, 8(3), 161-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02016934
- Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719-745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2
- Prebor, G. (2010). Analysis of the interdisciplinary nature of library and information science. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 42(4), 256-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000610380820
- Qin, J., Lancaster, F. W., & Allen, B. (1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 48(10), 893-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893::aid-asi5>3.0.co;2-x
- Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., O'Hare, A., Nightingale, P., & Stirling, A. (2012). How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business & management. Research Policy, 41(7), 1262-1282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015
- Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
- Rinia, E. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., & van Raan, A. F. (2002). Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics. Scientometrics, 53(2), 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014856625623
- Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000018542.71314.38
- Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423 and 623-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
- Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
- Stirling, A. (1998). On the economics and analysis of diversity. SPRU Electronic Working Papers. Retrieved from https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php.pdf
- Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707-719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2007.0213
- Tang, R. (2004). Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 54-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450410107
- Yegros-Yegros, A., Amat, C. B., D'Este, P., Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2010). Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher scientific impact. In STI Indicators Conference, Leiden.