KDI Journal of Economic Policy

Korea Development Institute (한국개발연구원)
권호 표지

Autonomy, Incentives, and School Performance: Evidence from the 2009 Autonomous Private High School Policy in Korea

  • Received : 2016.03.18
  • Published : 2016.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Improving the quality of school education is one of the key policy concerns in Korea. This paper examines whether providing schools with adequate autonomy and incentives can meet the policy goals by looking at a recent policy reform in Korea. In 2009, the Korean government granted autonomy to certain private high schools on the condition that no financial subsidies would be provided to the schools. Because the autonomous private high schools cannot receive a subsidy, they have a strong incentive to meet parental demands because schools failing to meet these demands will lose students and will have to close. Applying the value-added model to longitudinal data at the student level, I find that students entering these autonomous schools show faster growth in their academic achievement than their peers in traditional non-autonomous schools. These results suggest that providing schools with autonomy and incentives can be a useful policy tool for improving school education.

Keywords

References

  1. Hanushek, Eric A. 2003. "The Failure of Input-based Schooling Policies." The Economic Journal 113(485): F64-F98. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00099
  2. Kang, Changhui. 2012. "The Effect of Private Tutoring Expenditures on Academic Performance: Evidence from Middle School Students in South Korea." The KDI Journal of Economic Policy 34(2): 139-171. https://doi.org/10.23895/kdijep.2012.34.2.139
  3. Kim, Sunwoong and Ju-Ho Lee. 2003. "The Secondary School Equalization Policy in South Korea." Unpublished manuscript.
  4. Kim, Wuijeong and Jiyoung Namkung. 2014. "The Study on the Outcomes of Autonomous Public and Private High Schools." Journal of Educational Evaluation 27(2): 491-511 (in Korean).
  5. Lee, Jungmin and Jinseok Shin. 2014. "Mixing Good and Bad Apples: Spillover Effects of Introduction of Autonomous High Schools." Unpublished manuscript.
  6. Barrera-Osorio, Felipe, Tazeen Fasih, and Harry Anthony Patrinos with Lucrecia Santibanez. 2009. Decentralized Decision-Making in Schools: The Theory and Evidence on School-Based Management. The World Bank Publications.
  7. Ryu, Deockhyun and Changhui Kang. 2013. "Do Private Tutoring Expenditures Raise Academic Performance? Evidence from Middle School Students in South Korea." Asian Economic Journal 27(1): 59-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12002
  8. Todd, Petra E. and Kenneth I. Wolpin. 2007. "The Production of Cognitive Achievement in Children: Home, School, and Racial Test Score Gaps." Journal of Human Capital 1(1): 91-136. https://doi.org/10.1086/526401
  9. Park, Yoonsoo. 2014. An Empirical Study on School Choice and School Productivity. Policy Study 2014-18. Korea Development Institute (in Korean).