DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research and Development Methodology for Practical Use of Accident Tolerant Fuel in Light Water Reactors

  • Received : 2015.12.21
  • Accepted : 2015.12.21
  • Published : 2016.02.25

Abstract

Research and development (R&D) methodology for the practical use of accident tolerant fuel (ATF) in commercial light water reactors is discussed in the present review. The identification and quantification of the R&D-metrics and the attribute of candidate ATF-concepts, recognition of the gap between the present R&D status and the targeted practical use, prioritization of the R&D, and technology screening schemes are important for achieving a common understanding on technology screening process among stakeholders in the near term and in developing an efficient R&D track toward practical use. Technology readiness levels and attribute guides are considered to be proper indices for these evaluations. In the midterm, the selected ATF-concepts will be developed toward the technology readiness level-5, at which stage the performance of the prototype fuel rods and the practicality of industrial scale fuel manufacturing will be verified and validated. Regarding the screened-out concepts, which are recognized to have attractive potentials, the fundamental R&D should be continued in the midterm to find ways of addressing showstoppers.

Keywords

References

  1. US-DOE report, Light Water Reactor Accident Tolerant Fuel Performance Metrics, INL/EXT-13-29957, FCRS-FUEL-2013-000264., Feb. 2014.
  2. Expert Group on Accident Tolerant Fuels for Light Water Reactors Mandate, Nuclear Energy Agency, Boulogne-Billancourt (France), 2014 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/egatfl/.
  3. Available from:http://www.meti.go.jp/committee/sougouenergy/denkijigyou/jishutekianzensei/pdf/report02_01_00.pdf [in Japanese].
  4. J.C. Mankins, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) White Paper [Internet]. Technology readiness levels, 1995 [cited 1995 Apr 6]. Available from: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/trl/trl.pdf.
  5. J. Carmack, US-DOE report, Technology Readiness Levels for Advanced Nuclear Fuels and Materials Development, FCRD-FUEL-2014-000577, Jan. 2014.
  6. I. Idarrage-Trujillo, M. Le Flem, J.C. Brachet, M. Le Saux, D. Hamon, S. Muller, V. Vandenberghe, M. Tupin, E. Papin, E. Monsifrot, A. Billard, F. Schuster, Assessment at CEA of Coated Nuclear Fuel Cladding for LWRs with Increased Margins in LOCA and Beyond LOCA Conditions, Proceedings of TopFuel 2013, Charlotte (NC), 2013, p. 860.
  7. K.A. Terrani, S.J. Zinkle, L.L. Snead, Advanced oxidation-resistant iron-based alloys for LWR fuel cladding, J. Nucl. Mater. 448 (2014) 420-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.06.041
  8. Y. Katoh, L.L. Snead, C.H. Henager Jr., A. Hasegawa, A. Kohyama, B. Riccardi, H. Hegeman, Current status and critical issues for development of SiC composites for fusion applications, J. Nucl. Mater. (2007) 367-370, 659-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.032
  9. K. Minato, T. Ogawa, K. Fukuda, M. Shimizu, Y. Tayama, I. Takahashi, Fission product behavior in Triso-coated UO2 fuel particles, J. Nucl. Mater. 208 (1994) 266-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(94)90336-0
  10. T.M. Besmann, D. Shin, T.B. Lindemer, Uranium nitride as LWR TRISO fuel: Thermodynamic modeling of U-C-N, J. Nucl. Mater. 427 (2012) 162-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.04.021
  11. J.M. Harp, P.A. Lessing, R.E. Hoggan, Uranium silicide pellet fabrication by powder metallurgy for accident tolerant fuel evaluation and irradiation, J. Nucl. Mater. 466 (2015) 728-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.06.027
  12. L. Bourgeois, Ph Dehaudt, C. Lemaignan, A. Hammou, Factors governing microstructure development of Cr2O3-doped UO2 during sintering, J. Nucl. Mater. 297 (2001) 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00626-2
  13. H. Ohta, T. Ogata, K. Nakamura, T. Sawabe, A Concept of Accident Tolerant Control Rod for Light Water Reactors, Denryoku Chuo Kenkyusho Hokoku, (No. L13005), 2014 Jun [in Japanese].

Cited by

  1. Technology readiness levels for advanced nuclear fuels and materials development vol.313, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.11.024
  2. Thermal shock resistance and hoop strength of triplex silicon carbide composite tubes vol.14, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.12753
  3. Accident tolerant fuel cladding development: Promise, status, and challenges vol.501, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.12.043
  4. Studies on magnetron-sputtered zirconium-silicide coatings deposited on zirconium alloy for the enhancement of their high-temperature oxidation resistance vol.63, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2478/nuka-2018-0009
  5. Early studies on Cr-Coated Zircaloy-4 as enhanced accident tolerant nuclear fuel claddings for light water reactors vol.517, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.02.018
  6. Neutronic and mechanical evaluation of rare earth doped and undoped nitride-based coatings for accident tolerant fuels vol.518, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.02.044
  7. Corrosion and high-temperature steam oxidation of E110 alloy and its laser welds after ion irradiation vol.152, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.02.031
  8. A Review of Development of Zirconium Alloys as a Fuel Cladding Material and its Oxidation Behavior at High-Temperature Steam vol.46, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/jera.46.7
  9. Unveiling hermetic failure of ceramic tubes by digital image correlation and acoustic emission vol.103, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.16854
  10. Grand potential sintering simulations of doped UO2 accident-tolerant fuel concepts vol.532, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152052
  11. Steam oxidation behavior of Y-bearing cladding tube with aluminizing coating vol.7, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab99e6
  12. Application and Development Progress of Cr-Based Surface Coatings in Nuclear Fuel Element: I. Selection, Preparation, and Characteristics of Coating Materials vol.10, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090808
  13. First-principles investigations on the anisotropic elasticity and thermodynamic properties of U3Si2-Al vol.10, pp.58, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra07374a
  14. High‐temperature mass spectrometric study of thermodynamic properties in the UO2–ZrO2 system vol.34, pp.19, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8862
  15. Zr2Al3C4 Coatings on Zirconium-alloy Substrates with Enhanced Adhesion and Diffusion Barriers by Al/Mo-C Interlayers vol.36, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15541/jim20200286
  16. Analysis of SiC/SiC composites for energy applications at ambient conditions vol.104, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.17462
  17. Dynamic PRA Methods to Evaluate the Impact on Accident Progression of Accident Tolerant Fuels vol.207, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1794234
  18. Quenching Experiments with CrAl-coated Zircaloy Cladding in Reflooding Water Flows vol.14, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071859
  19. High-strength joint of nuclear-grade FeCrAl alloys achieved by friction stir welding and its strengthening mechanism vol.65, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.007
  20. Characterizing environment‐dependent fracture mechanisms of ceramic matrix composites via digital image correlation vol.104, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.17961