Taking Expedience Seriously: Reinterpreting Furnivall's Southeast Asia

  • Received : 2016.05.06
  • Accepted : 2016.06.12
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

Defining key characteristics of Southeast Asia requires historical interpretation. Southeast Asia is a diverse and complicated region, but some of modern history's "grand narratives" serve to unify its historical experience. At a minimum, the modern history of the region involves decisive encounters with universal religions, the rise of Western colonialism, the experience of world wars, decolonization, and the end of the "cycle of violence". The ability of the region's peoples to adapt to these many challenges and successfully build new nations is a defining feature of Southeast Asia's place in the global stage. This paper will begin with a question: is it possible to develop a hermeneutic of "expedience" as a way to interpret the region's history? That is, rather than regard the region from a purely Western, nationalist, "internalist" point of view, it would be useful to identify a new series of interpretative contexts from which to begin scholarly analysis. In order to contextualize this discussion, the paper will draw upon the writings of figures who explored the region before knowledge about it was shaped by purely colonist or nationalist enterprises. To this end, particular attention will be devoted to exploring some of John Furnivall's ways of conceptualizing Southeast Asia. Investigating Furnivall, a critic of colonialism, will be done in relation to his historical situation. Because Furnivall's ideas have played a pivotal role in the interpretation of Southeast Asia, the paper will highlight the intellectual history of the region in order to ascertain the value of these concepts for subsequent historical interpretation. Ultimately, the task of interpreting the region's history requires a framework which will move beyond the essentializing orientalist categories produced by colonial scholarship and the reactionary nation-building narratives which followed. Instead, by beginning with a mode of historical interpretation that focuses on the many realities of expedience which have been necessary for the region's peoples, it may be possible to write a history which highlights the extraordinarily adaptive quality of Southeast Asia's populations, cultures, and nations. To tell this story, which would at once highlight key characteristics of the region while showing how they developed through historical encounters, would go a long way to capturing Southeast Asia's contribution's to global development.

Keywords

References

  1. Alatas, Syed Hussein. The Myth of the Lazy Native: A Study of the Image of the Malays, Filipinos and Javanese from the 16th to the 20th Century and Its Function in the Ideology of Colonial Capitalism. 1977. Abington (United Kingdom) Routledge.
  2. Darwin, John. 2009. The Empire Project: The Rise and Fall of the British World System 1830-1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Englehart, Neil, A. 2011. Liberal Leviathan or Imperial Outpost? J.S. Furnivall on Colonial Rule in Burma. Modern Asian Studies, 45, 4. 759-790.
  4. Evers, Hans-Dieter (editor). 1980. Sociology of South-East Asia: Readings on Social Change and Development. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
  5. Furnivall, John. 1948. Colonial Practice and Policy: A Comparative Study of Burma and Netherlands India. New York: New York University Press.
  6. Goh Beng-Lan (editor). 2011. Decentring and Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  7. Heryanto, Ariel. 2007. Can There be Southeast Asians in Southeast Asian Studies. Knowing Southeast Asian Subjects. Laurie Sears ed. 75-108. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  8. Hui Yew Fong. 2009. 'The Most Influential Books of Southeast Asian Studies' Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 24, 1: vii-xi.
  9. King, Victor T. 2015. Southeast Asian Studies: Area, Method and Comparison. Suvannabhumi, vol. 7, no. 1: 13-57.
  10. Lee Hock Guan. 2009. Furnivall's Plural Society and Leach's Political Systems of Highland Burma. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, Vol. 24 no 1: 32-46.
  11. Pham, Julie. 2004. Ghost hunting in colonial Burma: Nostalgia, paternalism and the thoughts of J.S. Furnivall. South East Asia Research, Vol. 12, No. 2: 237-268.
  12. Pham, Julie. 2005. J. S. Furnivall and Fabianism: Reinterpreting the 'Plural Society' in Burma. Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 39, No. 2: 321-348.
  13. Pye, Lucien W. 1964. Southeast Asian Society: Dual or Multiple: Perspective Requires Two Points of Vision. The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 23, No. 3: 429-431.
  14. Rex, John. 1959. The Plural Society in Sociological Theory. The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 10, No 2: 114-124.
  15. Smail, John R.W. 1961. On the Possibility of an Autonomous History of Southeast Asia. Journal of Southeast Asian History, Vol. 2, No. 2: 72-102.
  16. Scott, James C. 2010. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press.
  17. Spector, Ronald D. 2008. In the Ruins of Empire: The Japanese Surrender and The Battle for Postwar Asia. New York: Random House.
  18. Wang Gungwu. 2011. Post Imperial Knowledge and Pre-Social Science in Southeast Asia. Goh Beng Lan ed. 60-80. Decentring and Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.