Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An acoustic and perceptual investigation of the vowel length contrast in Korean

  • Lee, Goun (English language informatics laboratory Yonsei University) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Jin (Center for Spoken Language Research (CSLR), Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • Received : 2016.02.02
  • Accepted : 2016.03.19
  • Published : 2016.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The goal of the current study is to investigate how the sound change is reflected in production or in perception, and what the effect of lexical frequency is on the loss of sound contrasts. Specifically, the current study examined whether the vowel length contrasts are retained in Korean speakers' productions, and whether Korean listeners can distinguish vowel length minimal pairs in their perception. Two production experiments and two perception experiments investigated this. For production tests, twelve Korean native speakers in their 20s and 40s completed a read-aloud task as well as a map-task. The results showed that, regardless of their age group, all Korean speakers produced vowel length contrasts with a small but significant differences in the read-aloud test. Interestingly, the difference between long and short vowels has disappeared in the map task, indicating that the speech mode affects producing vowel length contrasts. For perception tests, thirty-three Korean listeners completed a discrimination and a forced-choice identification test. The results showed that Korean listeners still have a perceptual sensitivity to distinguish lexical meaning of the vowel length minimal pair. We also found that the identification accuracy was affected by the word frequency, showing a higher identification accuracy in high- and mid- frequency words than low frequency words. Taken together, the current study demonstrated that the speech mode (read-aloud vs. spontaneous) affects the production of the sound undergoing a language change; and word frequency affects the sound change in speech perception.

Keywords

References

  1. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
  2. Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.15. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/ on March 23, 2016.
  3. Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (2001). Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 1-24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  5. Cha, J. (2005). The length of vowels in 1930s: a research on the sounds data of Joseoneodokbon. Korean Culture Research, 43, 105-128. (차재은 (2005). 1930 년대의 한국어 음장에 대한 연구: <보통학교 조선어독본>의 음성자료를 중심으로. 민족문화연구, 43, 105-128.)
  6. DiCanio, C., Nam, H., Amith, J. D., Garcia, R. C., & Whalen, D. H. (2015). Vowel variability in elicited versus spontaneous speech: evidence from Mixtec. Journal of Phonetics, 48, 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.10.003
  7. DiCanio, C. & Whalen, D. H. (2015). The interaction of vowel length and speech style in an Arapaho speech corpus. In the Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, Scotland: University of Glasgow.
  8. Elert, C. C. (1965). Phonological studies of quantity in Swedish: based on material from Stockholm speakers. Monografier utivna av Stockholms kommunalforvaltning: 27. Uppsala: Almqvist och Wiksell.
  9. Ernestus, M. (2014). Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua, 142, 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.006
  10. Hirata, Y. (2004). Effects of speaking rate on the vowel length distinction in Japanese. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 565-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.004
  11. Jung, M. & Hwang, K. (2000). A phonetic study on the vowel length in Sino-Korean words. Journal of the Society of Korean Language and Literature, 42, 285-299. (정명숙.황국정 (2000). 국어 한자어의 장단음에 대한 실험음성학적 연구. 어문논집, 42, 285-299.)
  12. Kang, Y., Yoon, T. J., & Han, S. (2015). Frequency Effects on Vowel Length Contrast Merger in Seoul Korean. Laboratory Phonology, 6(3-4), 469-503. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2015-0014
  13. Kenstowicz, M. & Park, C. (2006). Laryngeal features and tone in Kyungsang Korean: A phonetic study. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 12(2), 247-264.
  14. Kim, H. (2005). Korean word frequenc 2. Seoul: National Institute of Korean Language. (김한샘 (2005). 현대 국어 사용 빈도 조사 2. 서울: 국어연구원.)
  15. Kirchner, R. (2012). Modeling exemplar-based phonologization. In A. C. Cohn, C. Fougeron & M. K. Huffman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Ko, E. S. (2013). A metrical theory of Korean word prosody. The Linguistic Review, 30(1), 79-115.
  17. Koopmans-Van Beinum, F. J. (1980). Vowel contrast reduction: An acoustic and perceptual study of Dutch vowels in various speech conditions. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
  18. Lee, G. (2015). Production and perception of Korean and English word level prominence by Korean speakers. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kansas.
  19. Lee, K. & Ramsey, S. R. (2011). A history of the Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Lee, S. (1960). Studies on Korean Linguistics. Seoul: Tongyang Chwulphansa. (이숭녕 (1960). 국어학논고. 서울: 동양출판사.)
  21. Ohala, J. J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In C. S. Masek, R. A. Hendrick, & M. F. Miller (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior (pp. 178-203). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
  22. Park, J. (1985). A study on segmental length in Contemporary Korean. Malsori, 11-14, 121-131. (박주경 (1985). 현대 한국어의 장단음에 관한 연구. 말소리, 11-14, 121-131.)
  23. Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 137-157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  24. Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7 (pp. 101-140). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.