초등 예비교사들의 수학교과에서의 평가에 대한 인식

Prospective Elementary Teachers' Perceptions on Assessment in Mathematics

  • 투고 : 2016.02.03
  • 심사 : 2016.03.14
  • 발행 : 2016.03.31

초록

교육의 패러다임이 전환되면서 평가관행에서의 변화 또한 꾸준히 요구되어 오고 있다. 평가에 대한 교사의 올바른 인식은 평가의 질에 영향을 미치며 결과적으로 평가관행에서의 변화를 유도할 수 있게 된다. 본 연구는 초등 예비교사들의 수학교과에서의 평가에 대한 인식을 조사하기 위해 선행연구를 토대로 평가의 목적과 역할, 평가 자료와 평가의 신뢰도 그리고 평가 방법과 전략에 대한 문항들을 추출하여 설문조사를 실시하였다. 총 95명의 초등 예비교사들을 대상으로 설문조사한 결과, 초등 예비교사들이 평가의 역할, 평가 자료, 평가 전략에 대해서는 대체적으로 잘 인식하고 있었으나, 평가의 목적과 평가의 신뢰도, 평가 방법에 대해서는 다소 제한적인 인식을 가지고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 설문조사 결과를 바탕으로 초등 예비교사들의 평가에 대한 인식이 부족한 측면들에 대한 가능한 해석과 시사점을 제공하였다.

There has been a continual need for change of teachers' assessment practices as shifting a paradigm in education. Teachers' appropriate perception of assessment influences quality of assessment and leads to change of teachers' assessment practices. This study aimed at investigate prospective elementary teachers' perceptions on assessment in mathematics. To this end, we conducted a survey with the questionnaire which was developed based on previous studies on assessment. The questionnaire was composed of 41 questions about purposes and roles of assessment, materials of assessment, reliability of assessment, methods and strategies of assessment. 95 prospective elementary teachers participated in the survey. As a result, we found that prospective elementary teachers had appropriate perception on roles of assessment, materials of assessment and strategies of assessment, whereas they showed somewhat narrow perception on reliability of assessment, purposes and methods of assessment. Based on the results, we presented possible explanations about prospective elementary teachers' lack of perception on assessment and discussed implications for prospective elementary teacher education.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강애남, 이규민(2006). 학생들의 동료평가를 활용한 수행평가 결과의 일반화가능도 분석. 교육평가연구, 19(3), 107-121.
  2. 김동희(2006). 초등수학교육에서 서술형 수행평가 방법이 학업성취도 및 흥미와 자기 주도적 학습력에 미치는 영향. 고려대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
  3. 김래영, 이민희(2013). 수학과 서술형평가에 대한 중학교 교사들의 인식연구. 수학교육학연구, 23(4), 533-551.
  4. 김영기, 양승욱(2000). 수학과 수행평가에 대한 중학교 수학교사들의 인식 및 실시 현황. 학교수학, 2(2), 509-543.
  5. 김신영(2007). 교사의 학생평가전문성과 중등교사 양성과정. 교육평가연구, 20(1), 1-16.
  6. 김혜영(2014). 초등교육에서 수행평가의 타당성에 관한 교사와 학부모의 인식 비교 연구: 조사연구와 사례분석을 기반으로. 경인교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
  7. 박재현(2008). 서술형과제에 대한 평가피드백 유형이 학업성취수준에 따라 수학 불안, 자아개념 및 학업 성취도에 미치는 영향 : 초등학교 수학과 6-가 동료평가를 중심으로. 고려대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
  8. 양종현(2014). 초등학생의 수학적 과정 평가를 위한 서술형 평가문항 개발 및 적용. 광주교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
  9. 윤상이(2015). 초등교사의 학생평가 전문성이 학생의 수업만족도에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교대학원 석사학위논문.
  10. 정경화(2004). 중학교에서 시행되고 있는 수학학습평가에 대한 교사의 인식조사. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문.
  11. 정상권, 이경화, 유연주, 신보미, 박미미, 한수연(2012). 수학적 과정 중심 평가에 대한 교사들의 인식 조사. 수학교육학연구, 22(3), 401-427.
  12. 조미경(2005). 서술형 수행평가 문항과 평가기준 개발에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  13. 주미정(2010). 초등 수학교육에서의 수행평가 실행에 대한 연구. 서울교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
  14. Bennett, R. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 18(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
  15. Bidgood, P., Hunt, N., & Jolliffe, F. (2010). Assessment methods in statistical education: An international perspective. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  16. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
  17. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004). The formative purpose: assessment must first promote learning. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards Coherence Between Classroom Assessment and Accountability: 103rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 20-50). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2012). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (pp. 11-32). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  19. Brookhart, S. M., Andolina, M., Zuza, M. & Furman, R. (2004). Minute math: An action research study of student self-assessment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000049293.55249.d4
  20. Daugherty, R., Black, P., Ecclestone, K., James, M., & Newton, P. (2012). Alternative perspectives on learning outcomes: Challenges for assessment. In J. Gardner(ed.), Assessment and learning (pp.72-86). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  21. Gardner, J. (2012). Quality assessment practice. In J. Gardner(ed.), Assessment and learning (pp.103-121). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  22. Gipps, C. V. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24, 355-392.
  23. Harlen, W. (2012). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner(ed.), Assessment and learning (pp.87-102). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  24. Harlen, W. (2006). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp.87-102). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  25. Harlen, W., & James, M.(1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 4(3), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594970040304
  26. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  27. Klenowski, V. (1995). Student self-evaluation process in student-centered teaching and learning contexts of Australia and England. Assessment in Education, 2, 145-163.
  28. Morgan, C., & Watson, A. (2002). The interpretative nature of teachers' assessment of students' mathematics: Issues for equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 78-110. https://doi.org/10.2307/749645
  29. NCTM (1995). Assessment Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  30. National Research Council (2001). Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
  31. Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
  32. Santos, L., & Pinto, L. (2009). Lights and shadows of feedback in mathematics learning. In Tzekaki, M., Kaldrimidou, M. & Sakonidis, C. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 49-56. Thessaloniki, Greece.
  33. Santos, L., & Semana, S. (2015). Developing mathematics written communication through expository writing supported by assessment strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(2), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9557-z
  34. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
  35. Stallings, V. & Tascione, C. (1996). Student self-assessment and self-evaluation. Mathematics Teacher, 89, 548-54.
  36. Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic Assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838
  37. Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (1994). Using peer and self-assessment to development modeling skills with students aged 11 to 16. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(4), 413-431 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273381
  38. Watson, A. (2000). Mathematics teachers acting as informal assessors: Practices, problems, and recommendations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003933431489
  39. Watson, A. (1997). Coming to Know Pupils: a study of informal teacher assessment of mathematics. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 270-277. University of Helsinki, Finland.
  40. Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 1053-1098). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.