References
- 박영신, 임재희, 장미숙 (2011). 동시과제의 처리 적절성이 미래계획기억 수행에 미치는 효과. 인지과학, 22(4), 449-467.
- 윤용식, 손영우 (2011). 메타 인지적 인식과 미래계획기억 인출 과정. 인지과학, 22(2), 145-172.
- Abney, D. H., McBride, D. M., & Petrella, S. N. (2013). Interactive effects in transfer-appropriate processing for event-based prospective memory: The roles of effort, ongoing task, and PM cue properties. Memory & Cognition, 41(7), 1032-1045. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0324-7
- Benjamin, A. S. (2007). Memory is more than just remembering: Strategic control of encoding, accessing memory, and making decisions. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 48, 175-223.
- Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(4), 657. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.657
- Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL quarterly, 21(2), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586733
- Cohen, A. D., & Dornyei, Z. (2002). Focus on the language learner: Motivation, styles, and strategies. An introduction to applied linguistics, 170-190.
- DeMarie, D., Miller, P. H., Ferron, J., & Cunningham, W. R. (2004). Path analysis tests of theoretical models of children's memory performance. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 461-492. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0504_4
- Diana, R. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2008). The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.730
- Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2013). Four cornerstones of calibration research: why understanding students' judgments can improve their achievement. Learning and Instruction, 24, 58-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.002
- Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.717
- Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory mulTIPle retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(6), 286-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00382.x
- Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). Prospective memory and metamemory: The skilled use of basic attentional and memory processes. Psychology of learning and motivation, 48, 145-173.
- Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2010). Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007).
- Ellis, J., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2000). Prospective memory in 2000: Past, present, and future directions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(7), S1-S9. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.767
- Finn, B. (2008). Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control. Memory & Cognition, 36, 813-821. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.4.813
- Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2014). Overconfidence in children's multi-trial judgments of learning. Learning and Instruction, 32, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.001
- Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. The nature of intelligence, 12, 231-235.
- Geurten, M., Lejeune, C., & Meulemans, T. (2016). Time's Up! Involvement of Metamemory Knowledge, Executive Functions, and Time Monitoring in Children's Prospective Memory Performance. Child Neuropsychology, 22, 443-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2014.998642
- Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1989). Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 930. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.930
- Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Keener, M. C. (2008). Metacognition in education: a focus on calibration. In J. Dunlosky, & R. A. Bjork(Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory(pp. 429-455). New York: Taylor & Francis.
- Hultsch, D. F., Hertzog, C., Dixon, R. A., & Davidson, H. (1988). Memory self-knowledge and self-efficacy in the aged. In Cognitive development in adulthood (pp. 65-92). Springer New York.
- Khezrlou, S. (2012). The relationship between cognitive and metacognitive strategies, age, and level of education. Reading, 12(1).
- King, J. F., Zechmeister, E. B., & Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). Judgments of knowing: the influence of retrieval practice. American Journal of Psychology, 93, 329-343. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422236
- Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103; 490-517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
- Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual review of psychology, 51, 481-537. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.481
- Kvavilashvili, L., & Ellis, J. (1996). Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classifications. Prospective memory: Theory and applications, 6, 183-207.
- Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.68
- Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Hancock, T. W. (2000). On the interaction of ongoing cognitive activity and the nature of an event-based intention. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(7), S29-S41. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.769
- Maylor, E. A. (1996). Age-related impairment in an event-based prospective-memory task. Psychology and aging, 11(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.74
- Maylor, E. A. (1998). Changes in event-based prospective memory across adulthood. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 5(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1076/anec.5.2.107.599
- McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied cognitive psychology, 14(7), S127-S144. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.775
- Mcgann, D., Ellis, J. A., & Milne, A. (2002). Conceptual and perceptual processes in prospective remembering: Differential influence of attentional resources. Memory & Cognition, 30(7), 1021-1032. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194320
- Meeks, J. T., Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2007). Metacognitive awareness of event-based prospective memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(4), 997-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.005
- Meier, B., & Graf, P. (2000). Transfer appropriate processing for prospective memory tests. Applied cognitive psychology, 14(7), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.768
- Meier, B., von Wartburg, P., Matter, S., Rothen, N., & Reber, R. (2011). Performance predictions improve prospective memory and influence retrieval experience. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022784
- Meiser, T., & Schult, J. C. (2008). On the automatic nature of the task-appropriate processing effect in event-based prospective memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 290-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701319068
- Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 174-179. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.174
- Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 16(5), 519-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9
- Murray, B. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2012). The effects of emotion and encoding strategy on associative memory. Memory & Cognition, 40(7), 1056-1069. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0215-3
- Nelson, T. O., and Leonesio, R. J. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings, 26, In: Bower, G. (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Academic Press, New York.
- Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Allocation of self-paces study time and the 'labor-invain- effect.' Journal of Experimental Psychology of Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 476-486.
- Pannu, J. K., & Kaszniak, A. W. (2005). Metamemory Experiments in Neurological Populations: A Review. Neuropsychology Review, 15(3), 105-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-005-7091-6
- Reder, L. M. (2014). Implicit memory and metacognition. Psychology Press.
- Reder, L. M., & Schunn, C. D. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory.
- Rummel, J., Kuhlmann, B. G., & Touron, D. R. (2013). Performance predictions affect attentional processes of event-based prospective memory. Consciousness and cognition, 22(3), 729-741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.012
- Rummel, J., & Meiser, T. (2013). The role of metacognition in prospective memory: Anticipated task demands influence attention allocation strategies. Consciousness and cognition, 22(3), 931-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.06.006
- Schacter, D. L., & Graf, P. (1986). Effects of elaborative processing on implicit and explicit memory for new associations. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 12(3), 432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.12.3.432
- Schnitzspahn, K. M., Zeintl, M., Jager, T., & Kliegel, M. (2011). Metacognition in prospective memory: are performance predictions accurate? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022842
- Scullin, M. K., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2010). Control of cost in prospective memory: Evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017732
- Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., McVay, J. C., & McConnell, M. D. (2007). The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 734. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.734
- Weldon, M. S., & Roediger, H. L. (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197030
- Weldon, M. S., Roediger, H. L., & Challis, B. H. (1989). The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 17(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199561
- West, R., & Craik, F. I. (2001). Influences on the efficiency of prospective memory in younger and older adults. Psychology and aging, 16(4), 682. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.4.682