Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

The Korean Neurosurgical Society (대한신경외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Long-Term Outcome of Posterior Cervical Inclinatory Foraminotomy

  • Heo, Juneyoung (Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital) ;
  • Chang, Jae Chil (Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Hyung-Ki (Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital)
  • Received : 2016.01.18
  • Accepted : 2016.03.20
  • Published : 2016.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : A modified surgical technique of posterior cervical foramintomy called posterior cervical inclinatory foraminotomy (PCIF) was introduced in previous preliminary article. PCIF allows better preservation of facet joint and capsule than conventional techniques. The authors conducted a study to investigate long-term outcomes of PCIF. Methods : We retrospectively reviewed demographic, radiologic, and clinical data from the patients who underwent PCIFs at our institution. Criteria included a minimum of 48 month follow-up and PCIFs for patients with radiculopathy from foraminal stenosis (C2-T1; single or multilevel) with persistent or recurrent root symptoms despite conservative treatment for more than 3 months. Patients who had undergone previous cervical operation were excluded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used for clinical follow-up, and radiologic follow-up was performed to compare the changes of cervical sagittal alignment, focal angle and disc-space height of treated segment. Results : The PCIFs were performed between April 2007 and March 2011 on 46 patients (32 males and 14 females) with a total of 73 levels affected. The average duration of follow-up was 74.4 months. Improvements in radiculopathic pain were seen in 39 patients (84.7%), and VAS score decreased from $6.82{\pm}1.9$ to $2.19{\pm}1.9$. Posterior neck pain also improved in 25 patients (71.4%) among 35 patients, and VAS score decreased from $4.97{\pm}2.0$ to $2.71{\pm}1.9$. The mean disc-space heights of treated segment were $5.41{\pm}1.03mm$ preoperatively and decreased to $5.17{\pm}1.12mm$ postoperatively. No statistically significant changes in cervical sagittal alignment, focal angle were seen during the follow-up period (Cox proportional hazards analysis and Student t-test, p>0.05). Conclusion : The PCIF is highly effective in treating patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, leading to long-lasting relief in pain. Long-term radiologic follow-up showed no significant spinal angular imbalance.

Keywords

References

  1. Adamson TE : Microendoscopic posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for unilateral radiculopathy : results of a new technique in 100 cases. J Neurosurg 95 (1 Suppl) : 51-57, 2001 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2001.95.1.0051
  2. Cağlar YS, Bozkurt M, Kahilogullari G, Tuna H, Bakir A, Torun F, et al. : Keyhole approach for posterior cervical discectomy : experience on 84 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 50 : 7-11, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-970138
  3. Casotto A, Buoncristiani P : Posterior approach in cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 57 : 275-285, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01664844
  4. Chang JC, Park HK, Choi SK : Posterior cervical inclinatory foraminotomy for spondylotic radiculopathy preliminary. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 49 : 308-313, 2011 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2011.49.5.308
  5. Chen BH, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GB : Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy : posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy versus anterior discectomy with fusion. J Spinal Disord 14 : 17-20, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-200102000-00004
  6. Clarke MJ, Ecker RD, Krauss WE, McClelland RL, Dekutoski MB : Same-segment and adjacent-segment disease following posterior cervical foraminotomy. J Neurosurg Spine 6 : 5-9, 2007 https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.1.2
  7. Epstein JA, Janin Y, Carras R, Lavine LS : A comparative study of the treatment of cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Experience with 50 cases treated by means of extensive laminectomy, foraminotomy, and excision of osteophytes during the past 10 years. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 61 : 89-104, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01740074
  8. Fager CA : Posterolateral approach to ruptured median and paramedian cervical disk. Surg Neurol 20 : 443-452, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(83)90025-3
  9. Fessler RG, Khoo LT : Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy : an initial clinical experience. Neurosurgery 51 (5 Suppl) : S37-S45, 2002
  10. Frykholm R : Lower cervical vertebrae and intervertebral discs; surgical anatomy and pathology. Acta Chir Scand 101 : 345-359, 1951
  11. Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K : Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 : 1969-1973, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199609010-00005
  12. Hwang JC, Bae HG, Cho SW, Cho SJ, Park HK, Chang JC : Morphometric study of the nerve roots around the lateral mass for posterior foraminotomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 47 : 358-364, 2010 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.358
  13. Jagannathan J, Sherman JH, Szabo T, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA : The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease : a single-surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years' clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 10 : 347-356, 2009 https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.12.SPINE08576
  14. Kim JH, Lee CW, Chun KS, Shin WH, Bae HG, Chang JC : Morphometric relationship between the cervicothoracic cord segments and vertebral bodies. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 52 : 384-390, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2012.52.4.384
  15. Kwon YJ : Long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 56 : 224-229, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.56.3.224
  16. McAnany SJ, Kim JS, Overley SC, Baird EO, Anderson PA, Qureshi SA : A meta-analysis of cervical foraminotomy : open versus minimally-invasive techniques. Spine J 15 : 849-856, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.021
  17. Raynor RB, Pugh J, Shapiro I : Cervical facetectomy and its effect on spine strength. J Neurosurg 63 : 278-282, 1985 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1985.63.2.0278
  18. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G : Full-endoscopic cervical posterior foraminotomy for the operation of lateral disc herniations using 5.9-mm endoscopes : a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33 : 940-948, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b67
  19. Scoville WB : Types of cervical disk lesions and their surgical approaches. JAMA 196 : 479-481, 1966 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1966.03100190063017
  20. Scoville WB, Whitcomb BB, McLaurin R : The cervical ruptured disc; report of 115 operative cases. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 56 : 222-224, 1951
  21. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T : Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. Part I : Radiographic data from over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 21 : 1492-1498, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2167-5
  22. Zdeblick TA, Zou D, Warden KE, McCabe R, Kunz D, Vanderby R : Cervical stability after foraminotomy. A biomechanical in vitro analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74 : 22-27, 1992 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274010-00004