시스템엔지니어링학술지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Systems Engineering)

  • 제12권2호
  • /
  • Pages.81-90
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1738-480X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3592(eISSN)
한국시스템엔지니어링학회 (The Korean Society of Systems Engineering)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Conceptualizing Safety Systems Human Performance improvement using Augmented Reality

  • 투고 : 2016.09.25
  • 심사 : 2016.12.14
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The system performance of Engineered Safety Features is of utmost importance in a nuclear power plant. The human performance is identified as most critical to assurance of the optimal operability of safety systems during an emergency. The aim of this study is to determine how the performance of safety system could be evaluated using Augmented Reality technology. The paper presents a description of how a systems engineered approach could be used to develop the necessary operating conditions needed to conduct this measurement. Augmented Virtual Reality (AVR) interface technology is achieving ease of availability and widespread use in many applications today as illustrated by the launch of several AR and VR devices aimed at media consumption. As such, environments that incorporate such AVR hardware have become invaluable tools in designing human interface systems because of the high fidelity and intuitive response to natural human interaction that can be achieved [2]. The outcome of the measurement undertaken is to determine whether 1.) Operator(s) performance can be enhanced by introducing an improved cognitive method of monitoring plant information during an Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) and 2.) In correlation, inform the performance of the diverse safety systems on the basis of human factors.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Haskins, C., ed. 2010. Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities. San Diego, CA (US): INCOSE.
  2. Lanyi, C.S. (2012). Applications of Virtual Reality. Croatia: InTech.
  3. Sommerville, I. and Sawyer, P. (1997). Requirements Engineering: A Good Practice Guide. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
  4. Sage, A.P. and Rouse, W. B. (1999) Handbook of Systems Engineering Management. George Mason University: John Wiley and Sons.
  5. Salmon, P. et al. (2009). Distributed Situation Awareness: theory, Measurement and Application to teamwork. Surrey, England: Ashgate.
  6. Yang C.W et al., (2012). Assessing mental workload and situational awareness in the evaluation of computerized procedures in the MCR, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol 250 713-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.05.038
  7. OH, I.S et al. (1999). Development of Human Factors Evaluation Techniques for Nuclear Power Plants. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute.
  8. Kim, S.T et al. (2006. May). New Design of Engineered Safety Features-Component Control System to Improve the Performance and Reliability. Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting Chuncheon, Korea.
  9. Seker, A. (2014). Using Outputs of NASATLX for Building a Mental Workload Expert System. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of TURKEY, Kavakhdere 221 06100, Ankara Turkey.
  10. Gatto, L.B.S et al. (2012. November). Virtual simulation of a nuclear power plant's control room as a tool for ergonomic evaluation. Progress in Nuclear Energy 64 (2013), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2012.11.006
  11. Hong, J.H et al (2008). Computerized Procedure System for the APR1400 Simulator. Korea Electric Power Research Institute.
  12. Attwood, D et al, edited by Crowl, D. (2007). Human Factors Methods for Improving Performance in the Process Industries. (New Jersey: Wiley).
  13. Naser, J. (2007). Computerized Procedures: Design and Implementation Guidance for Procedures, Associated Automation and Soft Controls. Draft Report. EPRI 1015313.
  14. Gilmore, W. E., Gertman, D. I. and Blackman, H. S. (1989). The User-Computer Interface in Process Control: A Human Factors Engineering Handbook, (New York: Academic Press).
  15. U.S Department of Energy. (2009). Human Performance Improvement handbook: Volume 1: Concepts and Principles. (Washington D.C: DOE-HDBK-1028-2009).