Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회지)

The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Different Microbial Culture Supplements on In vitro and In situ Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics of Italian ryegrass Silage

미생물제 처리에 의한 이탈리안 라이그라스 사일리지의 In vitro 및 In situ 반추위 발효특성에 미치는 영향

  • Lim, D.H. (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ki, K.S. (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, S.H. (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, T.I. (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 임동현 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 기광석 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 최순호 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김태일 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원)
  • Received : 2016.06.23
  • Accepted : 2016.08.17
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the effects of microbial culture supplements on ruminal fermentation and fermentative quality of Italian ryegrass silage (IRGS) both in vitro and in situ. Three species of microbes (Lactobacillus casei (LC), Bacillus subtilis (BS), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC)) were used in this study. They were applied to IRGS at 30 days after silage manufacture. Various items were measured using in vitro and in situ incubation technique after each microbial supplement was inoculated into IRGS at $0.5{\times}10^4CFU/g$. In the first experiment, in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics of IRGS were evaluated at 0, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after microbes were inoculated into IRGS. In the second experiment, in situ fermentation characteristics were investigated at 0, 1, 3, and 5 days after the inoculation of each microbial supplement. In vitro ruminal $NH_3-N$ content was significantly (p<0.05) increased in LC-, BS-, and SC-IRGS at 12 hrs post incubation compared to that in control IRGS. In vitro ruminal total VFA concentration and dry matter digestibility (DMD) of IRGS were not significantly difference among LC-, BS-, and SC-IRGS, although they were numerically increased in LC-IRGS than those of the other IRGS. In addition, this study evaluated the fermentation characteristics and in situ DMD of IRGS with the lapse of incubation time up to 5 days. Throughout the incubation times from 1 day to 5 days, the pH value was significantly (p<0.05) lower in BS-, LC-, and SC-IRGS than that in control IRGS. Lactate was significantly (p<0.05) higher, and significantly (p<0.05) butyrate was lower in LC-IRGS than that in other treatments at 0 day. It was higher (p<0.05) in control IRGS than that of BS-, LC-, and SC-IRGS at 1-5 days. In situ DMD tended to increase in BS-, LC-, and SC-IRGS compared to that in control IRGS. Especially, DMD was higher in SC-IRGS than that in other treatments at 0 day. It tended to be higher in LC-IRGS at all incubation time. Taken together, these results suggest that it might be useful to select a microorganism by considering the feeding time of IRGS to ruminants because organic acids and DMD of IRGS were affected by the incubation time of each microorganism with IRG silage, especially for L. casei decreased the content of acetate and butyrate in IRGS.

본 연구는 국내산 조사료인 IRG 사일리지의 이용성을 증진하기 위해 다양한 미생물제의 첨가 시 IRG 사일리지의 in vitro 반추위 발효특성 및 소화율에 미치는 영향을 조사하였으며, 미생물제의 접종 후 배양시간이 경과함에 따라 IRG 사일리지의 품질 및 in situ 반추위 소화율에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 미생물제로는 LC, BS 및 SC ($2.7{\times}10^7CFU/m{\ell}$)를 사용하였으며, IRG 사일리지에 $0.5{\times}10^4CFU/g$가 되도록 첨가하여 수행하였다. In vitro 실험 결과, 암모니아태 질소 함량은 12시간 배양 시 대조구보다 미생물제 처리구에서 높았고(p<0.05), 총 VFA 농도와 건물 분해율의 경우에도 유의적 차이는 없었지만, 대조구보다 미생물제 처리구에서 증가하였으며, 특히 L. casei에서 높게 나타났다. 미생물제를 접종한 후 5일간 배양한 결과, IRG 사일리지의 pH는 대조구보다 미생물제 처리구에서 낮았으며(p<0.05), 젖산 농도는 배양 1~5일 동안 대조구보다 미생물제 처리구에서 높았으며(p<0.05), 다른 처리구보다 LC-IRGS에서 접종 직후 가장 높았다(p<0.05). In situ 건물 분해율은 대조구보다 모든 처리구에서 증가하는 경향을 나타내었으며, 접종 직후에는 SC-IRGS에서 높았으나 이후 LC-IRGS에서 증가하였다. 본 연구결과를 보면, IRG 사일리지의 이용성을 제고하기 위해 LC, BS 및 SC을 활용한다면 IRG 사일리지의 반추위 내 소화율이 개선될 수 있으며, 특히 IRG 사일리지에 L. casei를 첨가하여 단시간 추가 발효하여 젖소에 급여한다면 IRG 사일리지 내 초산 및 낙산의 감소로 품질 및 소화율 개선에 효과가 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Amanllah, S.M., Kim, D.H., Lee, H.J., Joo, Y.H., Kim, S.B. and Kim, S.C. 2014. Effects of microbial additives on chemical composition and fermentation characteristics of barley silage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science. 27:511-517. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13617
  2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 1995. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th edn. AOAC, Arlington, VA.
  3. Beuvink, J.M., Spoelstra, S.F. and Hogendorp, R.J. 1992. An automated method of measuring the time course of gas production of feedstuffs incubated with buffered rumen fluid. Netherlands Journal of Agriculture Science. 40:401-407.
  4. Buchanan-Smith, J.G. 1990. An investigation into palatability as a factor responsible for reduced intake of silage by sheep. Animal Science. 50:253-260.
  5. Chaney, A.L. and Marbach, E.P. 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry. 8:130-132.
  6. Cho, S.B., Kang, J.S., Cho, K.J., Lee, K.H., Kwon, C.H., Song, J. Y., Lee, K.H., Kim, S.Y. and Kim, E.J. 2014. Effect of homofermentative and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on the quality and aerobic stability of silage: Meta-analysis. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 34: 247-253. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2014.34.4.247
  7. Dawson, K.A., Neuma, K.E. and Boling, J.A. 1990. Effects of microbial supplements containing yeast and lactobacilli on roughage-fed ruminal microbial activities. Journal of Animal Science. 68:3392-3398. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.68103392x
  8. Desnoyers, M., Giger-Reverdin, S., Bertin, G., Duvaux-Ponter, C. and Sauvant, D. 2009. Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science. 92:1620-1632. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1414
  9. Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics. 11:1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  10. Erwin, E.S., Marco, S.J. and Emery, E.M. 1961. Volatile fatty acid analysis of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. Journal of Dairy Science. 44:1768-1771. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(61)89956-6
  11. FadelElseed, A.M. and Abusamra, R.M. 2007. Effects of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on NDF digestibility and rumen fermentation of forage sorghum hay in Nubian goat's kids. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 3:133-137.
  12. Hristov, A.N., Ropp, J.K. and Hunt, C.W. 2002. Effect of barley and its amylopectin content on ruminal fermentation and bacterial utilization of ammonia-N in vitro. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 99:25-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00076-7
  13. Kalogridou-Vassiliadou, D. 1992. Biochemical activities of Bacillus species isolated from flat sour evaporated milk. Journal of Dairy Science. 75:2681-2686. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78030-8
  14. Kleinschmit, D.H. and Kung Jr, L. 2006. A meta-analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn and grass and small-grain silages. Journal of Dairy Science. 89:4005-4013. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72444-4
  15. Krause, K.M. and Oetzel, G.R. 2006. Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 126:215-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.08.004
  16. Lynch, H.A. and Martin, S.A. 2002. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture and Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science. 85:2009-2014. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74277-X
  17. Mathieu, F., Jouany, J.P., Senaud, J., Bohatier, J., Bertin, G. and Mercier, M. 1996. The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae on fermentation in the rumen of faunated and defaunated sheep. protozoal and probiotic interactions. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 36:271-287. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19960305
  18. McAllister, T.A., Bae, H.D., Jones, G.A. and Cheng, K.J. 1994. Microbial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen. Journal of Animal Science. 72:3004-3018. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72113004x
  19. Moon, Y.H., Lee, K.A., Kim, Y.J. and Koo, Y.M. 2011. Current Status of EM (Effective Microoragnisms) utilization. Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering Journal. 26:365-373.
  20. Muck, R. and Kung, L.J. 1997. Effects of silage additives on ensiling. In: Field to Feedbunk North American Conference Hershey. PA. NRAES 99.
  21. Mutsvangwa, T., Edwards, I.E., Topps, J.H. and Paterson, G.F. 1992. The effect of dietary inclusion of yeast culture (Yea-Sacc) on patterns of rumen fermentation, food-intake and growth of intensively fed bulls. Animal Production. 55:35-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100037247
  22. Nocek, J.E. and Kautz, W.P. 2006. Direct-fed microbial supplementation on ruminal digestion, health, and performance of pre- and postpartum dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 89:260-266. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72090-2
  23. Padel, A.M.A. 2007. Effects of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on NDF digestibility and rumen fermentation of forage sorghum hay in Nubian goat's kids. Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science. 3:133-137.
  24. Paryad, A. and Rashid, M. 2009. Effect of yest (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on apparent digestibility and nitrogen retention of tomato pomace in sheep. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 8:273-278. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2009.273.278
  25. Qiao, G.H., Shan, A.S., Ma, N., Ma, Q.Q. and Sun, Z.W. 2010. Effect of supplemental Bacillus cultures on rumen fermentation and milk yield in Chinese Holstein cows. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 94:429-436.
  26. Rose, A.H. 1980. Rent research on industrially important strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In: Skinner, F.A., Passmores, S.M., and Danenport, R. R. (ed.) Biology and Activities of Yeasts. The Society for Applied Bacteriology Symposium Series. 9:103. Academic Press. London. UK.
  27. Satter, L.D. and Slyter, L.L. 1974. Effect of ammonia concentration of rumen microbial protein production in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition. 32:199-208. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19740073
  28. Seale, D.R. 1986. Bacterial inoculants as silage additives. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 61:9-26.
  29. Stewart, C.S., Flint, H.J. and Bryant, M.P. 1997. The rumen bacteria. In: The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem II(Eds. P. N. Hobson and C.S. Stewart). Chapman and Hall, London, UK. pp. 10-72.
  30. Sung, H.G. 2013. Effects of yeast culture supplementation on rice straw digestibility ad cellulolytic bacterial community in the rumen. Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 55:41-49. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2013.55.1.41
  31. Troelsen, J.E. and Donna, H.J. 1966. Ruminant digestion in vitro as affected by inoculum donor collection day, and fermentation time. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 46:149-156. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas66-022
  32. Van Soeat, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. 1991. Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle: Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74:3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  33. Wang, Z., Zhixiong, H.E., Beauchemin, K.A., Tang, S., Zhou, C., Han, X., Wang, M., Kang, J., Odongo, N.E. and Tan, Z. 2016. Comparison of two live Bacillus species as feed additives for improving in vitro fermentation of cereal straws. Animal Science Journal. 87:27-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12346
  34. Weidmeier, R.D., Arambel, M.J. and Wakters, J.L. 1987. Effect of yeast culture and Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on ruminal characteristics and nutrient digestibility. Journal of Dairy Science. 70:2063-2079. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80254-0
  35. Williams, A., Amat-Marco, M. and Collins, M.D. 1996. Pylogenetic analysis of Butyrivibrio strains reveals three distinct groups of species within the Clostridium subphylum of the Gram-positive bacteria. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 46:195-199. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-46-1-195