The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prognostic factors associated with the success rates of posterior orthodontic miniscrew implants: A subgroup meta-analysis

  • Hong, Sung-Bin (Private Practice) ;
  • Kusnoto, Budi (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Jeong (Private Practice) ;
  • BeGole, Ellen A (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago) ;
  • Hwang, Hyeon-Shik (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lim, Hoi-Jeong (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2015.04.20
  • Accepted : 2015.07.29
  • Published : 2016.03.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review previous studies and to assess, via a subgroup meta-analysis, the combined odds ratio (OR) of prognostic factors affecting the success of miniscrew implants (MIs) inserted into the buccal posterior region. Methods: Three electronic searches that were limited to articles on clinical human studies using MIs that were published in English prior to March 2015 were conducted. The outcome measure was the success of MIs. Patient factors included age, sex, and jaw of insertion (maxilla vs. mandible), while the MI factors included length and diameter. A meta-analysis was performed on 17 individual studies. The quality of each study was assessed for non-randomized studies and quantified using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analysis outcome was a combined OR. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses based on the study design, study quality, and sample size of miniscrews implanted were performed. Results: Significantly higher success rates were revealed for MIs inserted in the maxilla, for patients ${\geq}20$ years of age, and for long MIs (${\geq}8mm$) and MIs with a large diameter (> 1.4 mm). All subgroups acquired homogeneity, and the combined OR of the prospective studies (OR, 3.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.10-6.44) was significantly higher in the maxilla than that in the retrospective studies (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.60-2.74). Conclusions: When a treatment plan is made, these risk factors, i.e. jaw of insertion, age, MI length, and MI diameter, should be taken into account, while sex is not critical to the success of MIs.

Keywords

References

  1. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:373-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00565-1
  2. Moon CH, Lee DG, Lee HS, Im JS, Baek SH. Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region. Angle Orthod 2008;78:101-6. https://doi.org/10.2319/121706-515.1
  3. Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:109-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01211.x
  4. Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032
  5. Choi JH, Park CH, Yi SW, Lim HJ, Hwang HS. Bone density measurement in interdental areas with simulated placement of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:766.e1-12.
  6. Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Lee JW, Kim SH, Kim TW. Survival analysis of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:194-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.031
  7. Wu TY, Kuang SH, Wu CH. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:1595-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.015
  8. Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Deguchi T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.032
  9. Viwattanatipa N, Thanakitcharu S, Uttraravichien A, Pitiphat W. Survival analyses of surgical miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.018
  10. Wiechmann D, Meyer U, Buchter A. Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:263-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01325.x
  11. Dalessandri D, Salgarello S, Dalessandri M, Lazzaroni E, Piancino M, Paganelli C, et al. Determinants for success rates of temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a meta-analysis (n > 50). Eur J Orthod 2014;36:303-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt049
  12. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
  13. Morrison A, Polisena J, Husereau D, Moulton K, Clark M, Fiander M, et al. The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012; 28:138-44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462312000086
  14. Juni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, Bartlett C, Egger M. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:115-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/31.1.115
  15. Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:100-6.
  16. Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, Hung HC, Lai EH, Yao CC. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:768-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01405.x
  17. Antoszewska J, Papadopoulos MA, Park HS, Ludwig B. Five-year experience with orthodontic miniscrew implants: a retrospective investigation of factors influencing success rates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:158.e1-10; discussion 158-9.
  18. Manni A, Cozzani M, Tamborrino F, De Rinaldis S, Menini A. Factors influencing the stability of miniscrews. A retrospective study on 300 miniscrews. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:388-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq090
  19. Watanabe H, Deguchi T, Hasegawa M, Ito M, Kim S, Takano-Yamamoto T. Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density. Orthod Craniofac Res 2013;16:44-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12003
  20. Topouzelis N, Tsaousoglou P. Clinical factors correlated with the success rate of miniscrews in orthodontic treatment. Int J Oral Sci 2012;4:38-44. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2012.1
  21. Chen CH, Chang CS, Hsieh CH, Tseng YC, Shen YS, Huang IY, et al. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1209-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.016
  22. Tseng YC, Hsieh CH, Chen CH, Shen YS, Huang IY, Chen CM. The application of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:704-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.02.018
  23. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Ottawa Health Research Institute; [accessed 2006 May 11] Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  24. Cooper H, Hedges LV. The handbook of research synthesis. 1st ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications; 1994. p. 251.
  25. Lim HJ. Meta-analysis in dental research. J Korean Dent Assoc 2014;52:478-90.
  26. Greenland S. Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:290-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117248
  27. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446
  28. Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2001;20:641-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.698
  29. Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP, Papadopoulos MA. Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:577-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.016
  30. Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Celar AG, Bantleon HP, Burstone CJ. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:108-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.027
  31. Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS. Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Orthod Craniofac Res 2009;12:299-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01465.x
  32. Lim HJ, Choi YJ, Evans CA, Hwang HS. Predictors of initial stability of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:528-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq122
  33. Lai TT, Chen MH. Factors affecting the clinical success of orthodontic anchorage: Experience with 266 temporary anchorage devices. J Dent Res 2014;9:49-55.
  34. Lin SY, Mimi Y, Tak CM, Chiong FKW, Chew WH. A study of success rate of miniscrew implants as temporary anchorage devices in singapore. Int J Dent 2015;2015:294670.
  35. Paik CH, Park IK, Woo Y, Kim TW. Orthodontic miniscrew implant: Clinical applications. New York: Mosby; 2009. p.258.
  36. Lim HJ, Eun CS, Cho JH, Lee KH, Hwang HS. Factors associated with initial stability of miniscrews for orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:236-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.030
  37. Susanne C, Guidotti A, Hauspie R. Age changes of skull dimensions. Anthropol Anz 1985;43:31-6.
  38. Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Hashimoto T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(4 Suppl):S68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.017

Cited by

  1. Role of anatomical sites and correlated risk factors on the survival of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.19, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0225-1
  2. The temporary anchorage devices research terrain: Current perspectives and future forecasts! vol.24, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2018.01.014
  3. Miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: a review of available systems vol.45, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2018.1443873
  4. Reliability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: Bending and Maximum Load of Different Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and Stainless Steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) vol.11, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11071138
  5. Success rates and factors associated with failure of temporary anchorage devices: A prospective clinical trial vol.9, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12331
  6. Evaluation of miniscrew stability using an automatic embedding auxiliary skeletal anchorage device vol.89, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2319/121117-857.1
  7. Atomic layout of an orthodontic titanium mini-implant in human tissue: Insights into the possible mechanisms during osseointegration vol.89, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2319/051418-354.1
  8. A prospective, split-mouth, clinical study of orthodontic titanium miniscrews with machined and acid-etched surfaces vol.89, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2319/031618-211.1
  9. Maximum insertion torque loss after miniscrew placement in orthodontic patients: A randomized controlled trial vol.24, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12449
  10. Guided Insertion of Temporary Anchorage Device in Form of Orthodontic Titanium Miniscrews with Customized 3D Templates-A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies vol.11, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11121488